Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests.

Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom. .u.k
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.81). 12/2007; 104(47):18555-60. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0703333104
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Biodiversity loss from deforestation may be partly offset by the expansion of secondary forests and plantation forestry in the tropics. However, our current knowledge of the value of these habitats for biodiversity conservation is limited to very few taxa, and many studies are severely confounded by methodological shortcomings. We examined the conservation value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests for 15 taxonomic groups using a robust and replicated sample design that minimized edge effects. Different taxa varied markedly in their response to patterns of land use in terms of species richness and the percentage of species restricted to primary forest (varying from 5% to 57%), yet almost all between-forest comparisons showed marked differences in community structure and composition. Cross-taxon congruence in response patterns was very weak when evaluated using abundance or species richness data, but much stronger when using metrics based upon community similarity. Our results show that, whereas the biodiversity indicator group concept may hold some validity for several taxa that are frequently sampled (such as birds and fruit-feeding butterflies), it fails for those exhibiting highly idiosyncratic responses to tropical land-use change (including highly vagile species groups such as bats and orchid bees), highlighting the problems associated with quantifying the biodiversity value of anthropogenic habitats. Finally, although we show that areas of native regeneration and exotic tree plantations can provide complementary conservation services, we also provide clear empirical evidence demonstrating the irreplaceable value of primary forests.

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Historically, where forest habitats are deemed as the pristine landscape state, anthropogenic habitats such as managed grasslands or open spaces are often perceived to be antagonistic and of secondary conservation priority. Traditionally, studies on biodiversity responses to ecological variation, i.e. edge effect, have mostly focused on forest habitats. Yet recently there has been increased attention on communities beyond the forest edge in an effort to better understand how interactions between forests and adjacent habitats may potentially affect regional biodiversity. However, in Europe and the Mediterranean basin (a biodiversity hotspot), areas with high landscape heterogeneity and high edge density, there is a paucity of studies analysing the community responses across forest and ‘‘beyond edge’’ habitats across ecotones. In a protected area of central Italy, we investigated the responses of ground-dwelling arthropods [Araneae (spiders), Chilopoda (centipedes) and Carabidae (ground beetles)], which were differentiated into habitat-specific guilds (forest, edge and grassland species) across a forest–grassland ecotone. We investigated the extent to which a habitat edge influenced communities of arthropods associated with either the forest or grassland, and how far from the edge this effect penetrated into each habitat. Twelve 150 m-transects perpendicular to a forest–grassland edge were established and arthropods were sampled at nine progressive distances across the ecotone. An indicator species analysis was used to detect species significantly associated with forest, edge-belt or grassland habitats, which were assumed representative of the respective communities. Logistic models of indicator species richness and abundances were used to describe responses of grassland and forest communities across the ecological boundaries. We found that grassland and edge habitats had habitat specialists and higher species richness compared to the forest habitat. Moreover, the occurrence of grasslandspecific species was influenced by the presence of an edge up to 15 m from the habitat border. In contrast forest-associated indicator species were not affected by proximity to the habitat edge, rather individuals typical of forest habitats tended to ‘‘spill over’’ into grassland habitats. These findings support the hypothesis that in a forest–grassland mosaic, forest species are less sensitive to an edge and influence the community beyond the forest edge and into the grassland more than the reverse, i.e. the effect was asymmetric. From these data, we estimated that a minimum grassland habitat width of 600 m is necessary for grassland species to maintain a core area that is relatively unaffected by the spillover of species from adjacent forest habitats. Incorporating the directional influences of adjacent communities on each other allows for an empirical assessment of habitat vulnerability that doesn’t a priori value the conservation of one habitat over another.
    Biodiversity and Conservation 01/2015; 24(3):447–465. DOI:10.1007/s10531-014-0825-0 · 2.07 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Capsule In Ireland, which has relatively low diversity of bird species, commercially mature plantation oak forests (aged 72-151 years old) have similar bird diversity to typical semi-natural oak woodlands, and higher bird diversity than over-browsed semi-natural oak woodland, with bird diversity related to habitat complexity. Aims To investigate whether oak plantations can support comparable bird assemblages to semi-natural oak woodlands, and to assess if high levels of ungulate browsing and grazing impact on the quality of semi-natural oak woodland habitat for birds. Methods Bird and vegetation surveys were conducted in commercially mature oak plantations (n = 4), semi-natural oak woodlands (n = 10) and intensively browsed semi-natural oak woodland (n = 4). Species richness, total bird density, warbler density and density of parids were compared between oak forest types. Variation in bird communities between sites was investigated using ordination, and relationships between bird and vegetation metrics were assessed using general linear models. Results Bird diversity in plantation oak and the semi-natural forests subject to low levels of ungulate browsing, was similar, with no difference in species richness, total bird density or density of warbler and density of parids. However, browsed semi-natural oak woods had lower species richness than either of the other two study site types, and lower density of warblers than oak plantations. These observed differences in bird communities appear to be a result of browsing mediated differences in habitat complexity between the forest types. Conclusions Plantation forests of native tree species may support comparable bird communities to semi-natural woodlands in areas that lack forest specialists. Bird diversity in woodlands subject to high levels of browsing and grazing is likely to be limited, unless ungulate populations and their access to these woodlands are managed to promote the development of a more complex understorey.
    Bird Study 07/2014; 61(3):309-320. DOI:10.1080/00063657.2014.927415 · 1.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The combined effects of habitat fragmentation and climate change on biodiversity and biotic interactions are poorly understood. In the context of ongoing deforestation and agricultural intensification in the tropics secondary rainforest fragments might contribute to biodiversity conservation and mitigation of climate warming. This study investigated the interactive effects of habitat fragmentation and microclimate on the abundance and biotic interactions of trap-nesting bees and wasps in secondary forest fragments in the northwestern lowlands of Costa Rica. Fragment size did not affect hymenopteran abundance, parasitism and mortality rates, but all variables differed between edge and interior locations in the forest fragments. Interactive effects between size and location indicate higher mortality rates at interior locations in larger fragments. Microclimatic differences at edge and interior locations led to significant effects on all tested response variables. Abundance at interior locations was significantly higher with increasing temperatures. Mortality rates at interior location increased at lower mean temperatures, whereas higher temperatures at edges marginally increased mortality rates. Our results indicate that edge effects, mediated by altered microclimatic conditions, significantly change biotic interactions of trap-nesting hymenopterans in small secondary fragments.
    Biodiversity and Conservation 03/2014; 24(3):563-577. DOI:10.1007/s10531-014-0836-x · 2.07 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 2, 2014