The relationship of explanatory flexibility to explanatory style.

Kent State University, OH 44240, USA.
Behavior Therapy (Impact Factor: 2.43). 01/2008; 38(4):325-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2006.06.007
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Traditional cognitive vulnerability-stress models regarding the etiology of depression emphasize the content of the depressed individual's thoughts. One important cognitive content index, explanatory style, represents the habitual way that individuals assign causes to events that occur in their lives. A more contemporary model, however, emphasizes the cognitive process by which these attributions are made and to what extent the individual can make different attributions depending on the particular context of the event. This process is referred to as explanatory flexibility. Given that both indices of causal explanation are derived from the same assessment instrument, the Attributional Style Questionnaire, the current investigation sought to examine the extent to which the two variables can be differentiated from one another. Results indicated that explanatory style (a measure of cognitive content) and explanatory flexibility (a cognitive process measure) are empirically related, but distinct, constructs.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A number of recent authors have compared acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and traditional cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). The present article describes ACT as a distinct and unified model of behavior change, linked to a specific strategy of scientific development, which we term "contextual behavioral science." We outline the empirical progress of ACT and describe its distinctive development strategy. A contextual behavioral science approach is an inductive attempt to build more adequate psychological systems based on philosophical clarity; the development of basic principles and theories; the development of applied theories linked to basic ones; techniques and components linked to these processes and principles; measurement of theoretically key processes; an emphasis on mediation and moderation in the analysis of applied impact; an interest in effectiveness, dissemination, and training; empirical testing of the research program across a broad range of areas and levels of analysis; and the creation of a more effective scientific and clinical community. We argue that this is a reasonable approach, focused on long-term progress, and that in broad terms it seems to be working. ACT is not hostile to traditional CBT, and is not directly buoyed by whatever weaknesses traditional CBT may have. ACT should be measured at least in part against its own goals as specified by its own developmental strategy.
    Behavior therapy 06/2013; 44(2):180-98. · 2.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: La perspectiva cognitiva ha sido de gran utilidad en el campo del estudio de la depresión. Dicha perspectiva, además de posibilitar el desarrollo de tratamientos psicológicos eficaces, nos ha permitido comprender algunos importantes procesos por los cuales las personas se deprimen. Sin embargo, lejos de ser un modelo rígido y estancado, ha ido evolucionando a lo largo del tiempo, especialmente en los últimos años. En este artículo se revisan los nuevos desarrollos elaborados en relación a aspectos cruciales del modelo cognitivo de la depresión así como los nuevos procesos que se han comenzado a estudiar. Así, se describen los avances realizados en la comprensión de los esquemas negativos, la autoestima, el estilo atribucional o los procesos de memoria. Asimismo, se detalla el papel del estilo rumiativo o la supresión del pensamiento en los procesos de vulnerabilidad a la depresión. Por último, a modo de resumen, se plantea un modelo reformulado que integra los avances más recientes dentro del esquema clásico del modelo cognitivo para la depresión.
    Behavioral Psychology/Psicologia Conductual 06/2010; 18:139-165. · 0.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examined how explanatory flexibility and explanatory style, two indices derived from the Attributional Style Questionnaire (ASQ), were related to each other and to symptoms of depression. At Time 1, seventy-three college students completed the ASQ and a self-report measure of depression, and at Time 2, ap- proximately eight weeks later, completed the depression measure once again as well as a self-report measure of negative life events. Explanatory flexibility demon- strated relative independence from explanatory style. Additionally, explanatory flexibility, but not explanatory style, interacted with negative life events to predict change in depression symptoms such that rigidity was associated with higher levels of depression in the face of negative life events. These findings add to research sug- gesting that explanatory flexibility is distinct from, but related to, explanatory style and that both constructs add to our understanding of depression.
    Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology - J SOC CLIN PSYCHOL. 01/2007; 26(5):595-608.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 31, 2014