Stopping and time reversing a light pulse using
dynamic loss tuning of coupled-resonator
Sunil Sandhu,* M. L. Povinelli, and Shanhui Fan
Department of Electrical Engineering, Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
*Corresponding author: firstname.lastname@example.org
Received July 23, 2007; revised October 15, 2007; accepted October 18, 2007;
posted October 19, 2007 (Doc. ID 85496); published November 12, 2007
We introduce a light-stopping process that uses dynamic loss tuning in coupled-resonator delay lines. We
demonstrate via numerical simulations that increasing the loss of selected resonators traps light in a zero
group velocity mode concentrated in the low-loss portions of the delay line. The large dynamic range achiev-
able for loss modulation should increase the light-stopping bandwidth relative to previous approaches based
on refractive index tuning. © 2007 Optical Society of America
OCIS codes: 130.3120, 200.4740, 210.0210, 230.0230.
Systems that dynamically manipulate the group ve-
locity of light are of great interest in classical and
quantum information processing [1,2]. For this pur-
pose, dynamically tuned delay lines based on cas-
caded optical resonators have been well studied. In
these systems, it was shown theoretically that by
compressing the system bandwidth to zero, a light
pulse can be stopped [3–8].
Dynamically tuned delay lines generally rely on re-
fractive index tuning to achieve the required pulse
delay. However, the input pulse bandwidth is limited
by the tuning range of the refractive index. The oper-
ating bandwidth typically scales as ?n/n . For the
available index modulation strength of ?n/n?10−4
achievable bandwidth is on the order of 20–200 GHz
for ?=1.5 ?m light. In contrast, the strength of loss
modulation in semiconductors can be much larger. In
this Letter, we introduce a light-stopping scheme
based on loss tuning of coupled-resonator delay lines.
The process should increase the allowable input
pulse bandwidth as compared to index modulation
The basic requirements of a light-stopping process
are that the system supports a large-bandwidth state
to accommodate the input pulse bandwidth, which is
then tuned to a narrow-bandwidth state to stop the
pulse . In the following discussion, we give a gen-
eral description of our proposed light-stopping pro-
cess using loss modulation in the system shown in
Fig. 1. The low-loss resonator in the unit cell has a
static loss rate of ?0, while the lossy resonator has a
dynamic loss rate of ??t?. The coupling rate between
neighboring resonators is ?. In the initial state, one
sets ??t?=?0; the system therefore consists of a chain
of essentially lossless resonators ??0??? with cou-
pling rate ? large enough to accommodate the input
pulse bandwidth. Once the pulse is within the sys-
tem, the loss rate ??t? in every other resonator is
tuned to ?stop??. As a result, the system is brought
state. Inthis narrow-
bandwidth state, the low-loss resonators are essen-
tially decoupled from the lossy resonators, and the
signal energy is trapped in the low-loss resonators. In
this light stopping process, as long as one can get a
large dynamic range of loss modulation, one can
choose a large ? and, hence, accommodate a large
pulse bandwidth in the initial state.
During the tuning process, the pulse energy loss
peaks near ??t?=?, which defines a critical-damping
point. To minimize the overall loss that the pulse ex-
periences, the system should spend as little time as
possible in the vicinity of the critical-damping point
[i.e., the dynamic tuning of ??t? should be performed
as rapidly as possible]. Hence, dynamic tuning of the
system to the narrow-bandwidth state is performed
nonadiabatically. This is in contrast to the adiabatic
resonator light-stopping system. The unit cell has length L
and consists of a lossy resonator with dynamic loss ??t? and
a low-loss resonator with static loss ?0. The bottom plot
shows the modulation performed on ??t?, with the dotted
line indicating the critical-damping point.
Top diagram shows a section of the coupled-
November 15, 2007 / Vol. 32, No. 22 / OPTICS LETTERS
0146-9592/07/223333-3/$15.00 © 2007 Optical Society of America
tuning performed in light-stopping systems using in-
dex modulation .
We now perform a detailed numerical analysis of
the light-stopping system in Fig. 1. The system can
be described by the following coupled-mode equa-
tions, which have previously been shown to accu-
rately describe lightpropagation
photonic-crystal resonator systems :
= ?jf0− ??t??ai?t? + j?bi?t? + j?bi−1?t?, ?1?
= ?jf0− ?0?bi?t? + j?ai+1?t? + j?ai?t?.
The unit cell consists of two resonators with mode
amplitudes ai?t? and bi?t?. Each resonator has a
static resonance frequency f0. Tuning of ??t? is per-
formed such that discrete translation symmetry of
the system is always maintained. The complex eigen-
frequencies of the system are given by
f = f0+ j
??t? + ?0
??t? − ?0
where k is the Bloch wave vector. Equation (3) de-
fines two bands that we refer to as the lower band
(? sign) and the upper band (? sign).
Figure 2(a) shows the complex frequency f of the
system in its initial state with loss ??t?=?0??. There
is no splitting of Re?f? at k=?/L, and both bands
have the same loss. Since the upper band has very
high loss for ??t??? [Figs. 2(b) and 2(c)], we focus on
the lower band in the following discussion. The qual-
ity factor Q=f0/2 Im?f? of the lower band has a peak
value of f0/2?0at k=?/L. The peak is independent of
??t? because the k=?/L state has all its energy in the
low-loss resonator. At the critical-damping point ??t?
=? [Fig. 2(b)], the peak has a minimum width in k
space and the overall loss is largest. As ??t? is tuned
above ?, the width of the quality factor peak starts to
increase, which translates to a decrease of loss for
states near k=?/L. For ??t???, the entire lower
band and upper band are associated with the low-loss
and lossy resonators, respectively [Fig. 2(c)]. The fre-
quency bandwidth of both bands becomes very nar-
row, and the group velocity of the signal is zero.
To study pulse propagation during the dynamic
process, the coupled equations [Eqs. (1) and (2)] were
solved numerically for a system of N=70 unit cells. A
Gaussian input signal with bandwidth (full width at
half-maximum of the intensity) of 0.4 THz and center
frequency fc=193 THz was used [Fig. 3(a)]. The cou-
pling constant ?=1.2 THz and resonant frequency f0
=193 THz were chosen so that the pulse would oc-
cupy a frequency width ?fin the linear region of the
system bandwidth, and a k-space region with width
?knear k=?/L, which is the low-loss region for large
??t? [Fig. 2(c)]. Since discrete translational invariance
is maintained during the tuning of ??t?, the pulse oc-
cupies the same k-space region close to k=?/L during
the entire process [Figs. 2(b) and 2(c)]. ??t? was dy-
namically tuned from ?0=193 THz/?2?5000?
?stop=193 THz/?2?15? in 1 ps (Fig. 1), stopping the
pulse [Fig. 3(b)]. After a holding time of 1.33 ps, the
same dynamic process was applied in reverse to re-
trieve the signal. Figure 3(c) shows the pulse output,
which consists of a forward pulse and a backward
time-reversed pulse  of the same amplitude. No-
tice that the pulses are still Gaussian.
We now comment in detail on the loss mechanism
during the dynamic process. During the stopping pro-
cess [i.e., from Fig. 3(a) to Fig. 3(b)], approximately
half the signal energy is lost because half the input
pulse occupies the upper band, which acquires a high
loss as ??t? is tuned to ?stop. The remaining signal en-
ergy loss in this period occurs during the nonadia-
batic ?0→?stoptuning through the critical-damping
point ??t?=?. During the storage period [Fig. 3(b)],
Fig. 2. Band structure for the system shown in Fig. 1. The
left column shows ?Re?f?−f0?, while the right column shows
Q=f0/2 Im?f?. ?fand ?kdenote, respectively, the width in
frequency and in wave vector space occupied by a Gaussian
pulse with a bandwidth of 0.4 THz. (a) Initial state ??t?
??, where Q of both lower and upper bands are equal and
constant for all k vectors. (b) Critical-damping point ??t?
=?. (c) Narrow-bandwidth state ??t???, where Re?f? of
both lower and upper bands are equal and constant for all k
(a) input pulse, (b) pulse in narrow-bandwidth stop state,
(c) output pulses.
Spatial signal profile from coupled-mode analysis:
OPTICS LETTERS / Vol. 32, No. 22 / November 15, 2007
loss arises due to attenuation of the signal in the Download full-text
narrow-bandwidth stop state. The attenuation of the
signal during the narrow-bandwidth state as well as
the slight increase in pulse width can be reduced by
increasing the ratio ?stop/?, which increases the
width in the k space associated with the lower band
quality factor [Fig. 3(c)]. During the release process
[i.e., from Fig. 3(b) to Fig. 3(c)], additional loss results
from the nonadiabatic tuning of ??t?, which leads to
signal leakage into the upper band and a backward
time-reversed pulse [Fig. 3(c)].
We note that in the coupled-mode theory, it is as-
sumed that the loss of the lossy resonators can be in-
creased without any effect on the low-loss resonators.
We have performed finite-difference time domain
(FDTD)  simulations of a 2D coupled resonator
photonic crystal system similar to Fig. 1. We have
verified that the shape of the Q?k? curve in the
narrow-bandwidth state [Fig. 2(c)] agrees with the
coupled-mode theory. Thus, the coupled-mode theory
accurately describes the dynamic light-stopping pro-
cess. Due to field penetration effects, there is an ad-
ditional signal loss not captured in the coupled-mode
theory. However, we have verified that for the ex-
ample shown here, this additional signal loss is mini-
We observe in the simulation that the backward
time-reversed pulse has the same amplitude as the
forward pulse. This effect can be explained as follows:
consider a particular wave vector point k0within the
spatial spectrum of the signal. At the start of the
pulse release process, the signal energy at k0is com-
pletely within the lower band. In addition, the value
of Re?f? for both lower and upper bands is constant
and equal [Fig. 2(c)]. As ??t? is decreased during the
pulse release process, the values of Re?f?k0?? for the
lower and upper bands split when the losses Im?f?k0??
become equal [Eq. (3)]. The band splitting is in equal
and opposite directions. As a result, the signal energy
from the initially flat lower band at k0is distributed
equally among the lower and upper bands. Since dis-
crete translational invariance is maintained through-
out the tuning process, this argument can be gener-
alized to all wave vector points within the spatial
spectrum of the signal.
In the above numerical simulation, the modulation
performed on ??t? corresponds to modulating the ma-
terial loss from ?=14 cm−1to ?=4500 cm−1in a time
of 1 ps (???/v, where v is the group velocity in the
bulk material). In InGaAs/InP quantum wells oper-
ating at room temperature, tuning the material loss
from ?=1500 cm−1to ??0 cm−1has been demon-
strated . Moreover, the intrinsic response time of
this system is in the femtosecond range . It is
likely that a higher contrast ratio of the material loss
can be accomplished at a lower operating tempera-
ture. In silicon devices tuned via free carrier injec-
tion, achieving a material loss of ?=4500 cm−1re-
quires an injected carrier density of ?4?1020cm−3,
which may be achievable in heavily doped structures
. In such a system one needs to remove most of
the carriers to achieve the low material loss value of
?=14 cm−1. This can potentially be achieved with a
reverse bias structure . The modulation time is
fundamentally limited by the carrier lifetime. In sili-
con photonic crystals, the carrier lifetime can be re-
duced by manipulating the degree of surface passiva-
tion to obtain strong surface recombination or by
using ion implantation . For example, a carrier
lifetime of less than 1 ps has been demonstrated in
ion-implanted Si .
This work is supported in part by the United
States AirForce Office
(AFOSR) grant FA9550-05-0414 and the Packard
Foundation. The authors thank D. A. B. Miller and
Onur Fidaner for discussions.
1. C. Liu, Z. Dutton, C. H. Behroozi, and L. V. Hau,
Nature 409, 490 (2001).
2. D. F. Phillips, A. Fleischhauer, A. Mair, R. L.
Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 783
3. M. F. Yanik and S. Fan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 083901
4. Z. S. Yang, N. H. Kwong, R. Binder, and A. L. Smirl,
Opt. Lett. 30, 2790 (2005).
5. J. B. Khurgin, Phys. Rev. A 72, 023810 (2005).
6. S. Sandhu, M. L. Povinelli, M. F. Yanik, and S. Fan,
Opt. Lett. 31, 1985 (2006).
7. S. Longhi, Phys. Rev. E 75, 026606 (2007).
8. Q. Xu, P. Dong, and M. Lipson, Nat. Phys. 3, 406
9. M. F. Yanik and S. Fan, Phys. Rev. A 71, 013803 (2005).
10. M. Lipson, J. Lightwave Technol. 23, 4222 (2005).
11. M. F. Yanik and S. Fan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 173903
12. A.Taflove andS. C.
Electrodynamics (Artech House, 2000).
13. I. Bar-Joseph, C. Klingshirn, D. A. B. Miller, D. S.
Chemla, U. Koren, and B. I. Miller, Appl. Phys. Lett.
50, 1010 (1987).
14. W. H. Knox, D. S. Chemela, D. A. B. Miller, J. B. Stark,
and S. Schmitt-Rink, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1190 (1989).
15. R. A. Soref and B. R. Bennett, IEEE J. Quantum
Electron. 23, 123 (1987).
16. H. Rong, R. Jones, A. Liu, O. Cohen, D. Hak, A. Fang,
and M. Paniccia, Nature 433, 725 (2005).
17. A. Chin, K. Y. Lee, B. C. Lin, and S. Horng, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 69, 653 (1996).
November 15, 2007 / Vol. 32, No. 22 / OPTICS LETTERS