Multiple chronic conditions: prevalence, health consequences, and implications for quality, care management, and costs.

Institute for Health Policy in the Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.28). 01/2008; 22 Suppl 3:391-5. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0322-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Persons with multiple chronic conditions are a large and growing segment of the US population. However, little is known about how chronic conditions cluster, and the ramifications of having specific combinations of chronic conditions. Clinical guidelines and disease management programs focus on single conditions, and clinical research often excludes persons with multiple chronic conditions. Understanding how conditions in combination impact the burden of disease and the costs and quality of care received is critical to improving care for the 1 in 5 Americans with multiple chronic conditions. This Medline review of publications examining somatic chronic conditions co-occurring with 1 or more additional specific chronic illness between January 2000 and March 2007 summarizes the state of our understanding of the prevalence and health challenges of multiple chronic conditions and the implications for quality, care management, and costs.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The purpose of this paper is to discuss the ongoing definitional, measurement and analytic challenges imposed on community-based diabetes researchers examining the experiences and outcomes of home-dwelling adults surviving longer with diabetes and additional comorbid health conditions. When selecting from the still limited number of standard hospital-oriented comorbidity methods, researchers across the world will need to consider a frequently complex series of methodological decisions from their enrolling such adults with increased comorbidity into study samples. CONCLUSIONS: Three categories of methodological implications from increasing forms of comorbid diabetes are discussed for diabetes researchers. Six sequenced research design strategies with specific examples are offered regarding how to most rigorously incorporate elements of comorbidity into prospective diabetes study designs.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice 12/2012; · 2.74 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medical teaching teams (MTTs) must balance teaching and patient care in the face of three challenges: shifting team membership, varying levels of learners and patient complexity. To support care, MTTs rely on a combination of recurrent oral and written communication practices (genres), such as admission, progress and discharge notes. The purpose of this study was to explore how these genres influence the team's ability to collectively care for patients. This was a multiple case study with data collected through observations and audio-recordings of 19 patient cases focusing on admission review discussions and chart documents throughout the hospitalisation. Participants included 14 medical students, 32 residents and 10 attending physicians rotating through one of three internal medicine MTTs. We used constant comparative analysis to identify recurrent patterns across the multiple cases, which were further elaborated in a return-of-findings focus group. The MTT genre system facilitated the care of patients through 'progressive collaborative refinement' (PCR): MTTs use case and data reviews to collaboratively and progressively refine their understanding of the patient's problems and develop strategies for addressing them. Progressive collaborative refinement was apparent through modifications made in the documentation. Although modifications were a necessary component, they were not sufficient: some modifications were made without refinement. We characterised incidents of failed modification as 'fragmentation'. Three types were observed: conceptualisation, documentation and continuity of care providers. In most cases, all three were present and interacted to impede PCR. Progressive collaborative refinement was used by MTTs to provide the optimal care to patients. Progressive collaborative refinement was impeded by a lack of continuity of care providers and gaps between communication genres that fragmented conceptualisation and documentation. Progressive collaborative refinement can be understood as both an overarching process and a shared but unstated ideal. Through defining and describing PCR, the present findings can be used to improve communication and teaching.
    Medical Education 03/2014; 48(3):301-14. · 3.55 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 01/2011; 46(4):351-351. · 2.86 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 5, 2014