Article

Community Learning Disability Teams: perceived effectiveness, multidisciplinary working and service user satisfaction

Institute of Nursing Research, University of Ulster, Ireland.
Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 01/2008; 11(4):329-42. DOI: 10.1177/1744629507085271
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The locus of care for people with learning disabilities has shifted from institutional/residential care to community care, with Community Learning Disability Teams (CLDTs) providing support for people with learning disabilities, and their family caregivers, in the community. A survey of the perceived effectiveness of 145 CLDT members, 27 family caregivers and 21 people with a learning disability was undertaken. Findings suggest high levels of perceived effectiveness with the services provided by the CLDTs, but caregivers gave the lowest satisfaction ratings. Although overall effectiveness was rated highly there is no room for complacency. There was limited evidence to support the view that multidisciplinary CLDTs are more effective than unidisciplinary teams. Further research is required in this area and ongoing evaluation of the effectiveness of CLDTs is suggested.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Laurence Taggart, Jun 03, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
264 Views
 · 
9 Downloads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In response to rising local need and national drivers such as the Mansell Report, an isolated inpatient ward for people with an intellectual disability and additional mental health and behavioural problems was developed into a more flexible service integrating inpatient beds, day assessment, outreach and the local community learning disability teams. The functioning of the new service is evaluated on the basis of the way it was utilized in its first 2 years, and its outcomes, and compared with the pre-existing, more traditional inpatient ward. Although the new service model treated a higher number of people, it was more able to prevent or shorten inpatient admissions and to prevent placement breakdown and reduce aggressive incidents amongst inpatients during their stay. The integrated model described, whilst not being immune to the problem of delayed discharge, has in its first 2 years been a more effective, more flexible and safer service than the previous more traditional model.
    Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 03/2011; 15(1):7-19. DOI:10.1177/1744629511403563
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Forward On behalf of the research team, I am pleased to introduce this report which presents the findings of a regional evaluation entitled: The provision of community nursing support for persons with an intellectual disability and palliative care needs. The broadening of the World Health Organisation (2002) position on palliative care, developed to include the provision of palliative care for all persons with a life threatening illness regardless of diagnosis, has resulted in increased numbers of patients and families accessing palliative/end of life care services. It is known that people with an intellectual disability have a disproportionate health burden when compared with the general population and accessing health service can be difficult. In today’s society people with an intellectual disability have largely moved away from a long term residential model of care, and are accessing wider health services. They are entitled to receive equitable care and support from a workforce that recognises all as equal citizens. However, internationally it is acknowledged that there is an inequity of experience for people with an intellectual disability within mainstream health services, and this is not satisfactory. This report provides a snapshot of community nursing practice in an Irish setting of palliative/end of life care for people with an intellectual disability in a health region. The report is a welcome addition to the existing international literature which includes a small number of Irish studies. I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely thank the respondents for giving of their time to complete the questionnaire and the Irish Hospice Foundation and the University of Limerick for their continued interest and support.
    12/2011; University of Limerick and Irish Hospice Foundation., ISBN: 1-905952-37-6 978-1-905952-37-3
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Individuals with an intellectual disability often require intensive services to promote their social participation to the fullest extent. As such, measuring satisfaction with these services appears essential to enhance the quality of life of individuals with an intellectual disability and to improve service delivery within agencies. Thus, the purpose of the study was to conduct an initial validation of the Brief Assessment of Service Satisfaction in Persons with an Intellectual Disability (BASSPID), a 15-item questionnaire designed to assess service satisfaction. To examine the structure, reliability, and validity of the BASSPID, we interviewed 98 individuals with an intellectual disability and 23 parents. Overall, the BASSPID contained one scale, which had strong content and convergent validity as well as items easily understandable for individuals with an intellectual disability. Furthermore, the questionnaire had good internal consistency and adequate test-retest reliability. However, parents generally overestimated the perceived satisfaction of their child. The study suggests that the BASSPID may be useful to assess the satisfaction of individuals with an intellectual disability, but more research is needed to examine its potential impact on improving service quality.
    Research in developmental disabilities 10/2013; 35(1). DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.10.009 · 4.41 Impact Factor
Show more