Community Learning Disability Teams: perceived effectiveness, multidisciplinary working and service user satisfaction

Institute of Nursing Research, University of Ulster, Ireland.
Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 01/2008; 11(4):329-42. DOI: 10.1177/1744629507085271
Source: PubMed


The locus of care for people with learning disabilities has shifted from institutional/residential care to community care, with Community Learning Disability Teams (CLDTs) providing support for people with learning disabilities, and their family caregivers, in the community. A survey of the perceived effectiveness of 145 CLDT members, 27 family caregivers and 21 people with a learning disability was undertaken. Findings suggest high levels of perceived effectiveness with the services provided by the CLDTs, but caregivers gave the lowest satisfaction ratings. Although overall effectiveness was rated highly there is no room for complacency. There was limited evidence to support the view that multidisciplinary CLDTs are more effective than unidisciplinary teams. Further research is required in this area and ongoing evaluation of the effectiveness of CLDTs is suggested.

Download full-text


Available from: Laurence Taggart, Jun 03, 2015
1 Follower
45 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In response to rising local need and national drivers such as the Mansell Report, an isolated inpatient ward for people with an intellectual disability and additional mental health and behavioural problems was developed into a more flexible service integrating inpatient beds, day assessment, outreach and the local community learning disability teams. The functioning of the new service is evaluated on the basis of the way it was utilized in its first 2 years, and its outcomes, and compared with the pre-existing, more traditional inpatient ward. Although the new service model treated a higher number of people, it was more able to prevent or shorten inpatient admissions and to prevent placement breakdown and reduce aggressive incidents amongst inpatients during their stay. The integrated model described, whilst not being immune to the problem of delayed discharge, has in its first 2 years been a more effective, more flexible and safer service than the previous more traditional model.
    Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 03/2011; 15(1):7-19. DOI:10.1177/1744629511403563
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Forward On behalf of the research team, I am pleased to introduce this report which presents the findings of a regional evaluation entitled: The provision of community nursing support for persons with an intellectual disability and palliative care needs. The broadening of the World Health Organisation (2002) position on palliative care, developed to include the provision of palliative care for all persons with a life threatening illness regardless of diagnosis, has resulted in increased numbers of patients and families accessing palliative/end of life care services. It is known that people with an intellectual disability have a disproportionate health burden when compared with the general population and accessing health service can be difficult. In today’s society people with an intellectual disability have largely moved away from a long term residential model of care, and are accessing wider health services. They are entitled to receive equitable care and support from a workforce that recognises all as equal citizens. However, internationally it is acknowledged that there is an inequity of experience for people with an intellectual disability within mainstream health services, and this is not satisfactory. This report provides a snapshot of community nursing practice in an Irish setting of palliative/end of life care for people with an intellectual disability in a health region. The report is a welcome addition to the existing international literature which includes a small number of Irish studies. I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely thank the respondents for giving of their time to complete the questionnaire and the Irish Hospice Foundation and the University of Limerick for their continued interest and support.
    12/2011; University of Limerick and Irish Hospice Foundation., ISBN: 1-905952-37-6 978-1-905952-37-3
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background There have been significant concerns about the care and treatment of people with intellectual disabilities (ID) when attending general hospitals, which have led to inquiries that highlight service and systems failures. One response has been the development of Learning Disability Liaison Nursing (LDLN) Services across the UK that aim to ensure that additional, specialist support is available for patients, their carers and general healthcare professionals. Methods A mixed-methods study to investigate the impact of LDLN Services across four Scottish NHS boards was undertaken. In total, 323 referrals made over 18 months were analysed along with qualitative data drawn from interviews and focus groups with a sample of 85 participants including patients with ID (n = 5), carers (n = 16), primary care healthcare professionals (n = 39) and general hospital professionals (n = 19) and learning disability liaison nurses (n = 6). Results The referral patterns to the four liaison nursing services closely matched the known health needs of adults with ID, with common admissions being due to neurological, respiratory and gastrointestinal issues. The LDLN role was seen to be complex and impacted on three key areas: (i) clinical patient care; (ii) education and practice development; and (iii) strategic organisational developments. Specific patient outcomes were linked to issues relating to capacity and consent to treatment, fostering person-centred adjustments to care, augmenting communication and the liaison nurses acting as positive role models and ambassadors for people with ID. Conclusions The LDLN Services were valued by stakeholders by achieving person-centred outcomes. With their expert knowledge and skills, the liaison nurses had an important role in developing effective systems and processes within general hospital settings. The outcomes highlight the importance of supporting and promoting LDLN Services and the challenges in delivering the multifaceted elements of the role. There is a need to take account of the complex and multidimensional nature of the LDLN role and the possible tensions between achieving clinical outcomes, education and practice developments and organisational strategic initiatives.
    Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 12/2011; 56(12). DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01511.x · 2.41 Impact Factor
Show more