Executive functioning among Finnish adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 6.35). 01/2008; 46(12):1594-604. DOI: 10.1097/chi.0b013e3181575014
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The present study examined cognitive functioning in a population sample of adolescents with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) from the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1986.
The sample consisted of 457 adolescents ages 16 to 18 who were assessed using a battery of cognitive tasks. Performance according to diagnostic group (control, behavior disorder, and ADHD) and sex was compared. Then, the effect of executive function deficit (EFD) was assessed by diagnostic group status on behavioral and cognitive measures.
When compared to non-ADHD groups, adolescents with ADHD exhibited deficits on almost all of the cognitive measures. The behavior disorder group obtained scores that were generally intermediate between the ADHD and control groups, but exhibited deficits in intelligence and executive function similar to the ADHD group. Approximately half the ADHD sample had EFD; however, the type and presence of EFDs were not differentially related to cognitive performance as a function of diagnosis.
These findings indicate that EFDs are more frequent in ADHD than control or behavior disorder groups. EFDs are a general risk factor for poor cognitive functioning across multiple domains, irrespective of diagnostic status.

Download full-text


Available from: May Yang, Jan 13, 2014
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Attention Network Test (ANT) is a well established behavioral measure in neuropsychological research to assess three different facets of selective attention, i.e., alerting, orienting, and conflict processing. Although the ANT has been applied in healthy individuals and various clinical populations, data on retest reliability are scarce in healthy samples and lacking for clinical populations. The objective of the present study was a longitudinal assessment of relevant ANT network measures in healthy controls and schizophrenic patients. Forty-five schizophrenic patients and 55 healthy controls were tested with ANT in a test-retest design with an average interval of 7.4 months between test sessions. Test-retest reliability was analyzed with Pearson and Intra-class correlations. Healthy controls revealed moderate to high test-retest correlations for mean reaction time, mean accuracy, conflict effect, and conflict error rates. In schizophrenic patients, moderate test-retest correlations for mean reaction time, orienting effect, and conflict effect were found. The analysis of error rates in schizophrenic patients revealed very low test-retest correlations. The current study provides converging statistical evidence that the conflict effect and mean reaction time of ANT yield acceptable test-retest reliabilities in healthy controls and, investigated longitudinally for the first time, also in schizophrenia. Obtained differences of alerting and orienting effects in schizophrenia case-control studies should be considered more carefully. The analysis of error rates revealed heterogeneous results and therefore is not recommended for case control studies in schizophrenia.
    Schizophrenia Research 12/2011; 133(1-3):218-22. DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2011.09.026 · 4.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Attention Network Test (ANT) is a tool used to assess the efficiency of the 3 attention networks-alerting, orienting, and executive control. The ANT has become popular in the neuropsychological literature since its first description in 2002, with some form of the task currently appearing in no less than 65 original research papers. Although several general reviews of the ANT exist, none provide an analysis of its psychometric properties. Data from 15 unique studies were collected, resulting in a large sample (N = 1,129) of healthy individuals. Split-half reliability, variance structure, distribution shape, and independence of measurement of the 3 attention network scores were analyzed, considering both reaction time and accuracy as dependent variables. Split-half reliabilities of reaction time based attention network scores were low for alerting (rweighted = .20, CI 95%weighted [.14, .27], Spearman-Brown r = .38) and orienting (rweighted = .32, CI 95%weighted [.26, .38], Spearman-Brown r = .55), and moderate high for executive control (rweighted = .65, CI 95%weighted [.61, .71], Spearman-Brown r = .81). Analysis of the variance structure of the ANT indicated that power to find significant effects was variable across networks and dependent on the statistical analysis being used. Both analysis of variance (significant interaction observed in 100% of 15 studies) and correlational analyses (multiple-significant inter-network correlations observed) suggest that the networks measured by the ANT are not independent. In the collection, analysis and interpretation of any test data, psychometric properties, such as those reported here for the ANT, must be carefully considered.
    Neuropsychology 09/2010; 24(5):637-51. DOI:10.1037/a0019803 · 3.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examined perceptual and motor inhibition in a longitudinal sample of adolescents/young adults who were diagnosed with ADHD in childhood, and as a function of the relative persistence of ADHD. Ninety-eight participants diagnosed with ADHD in childhood were reevaluated approximately 10 years later. Eighty-five never-ADHD controls similar in age, IQ, sociodemographic background, and gender distribution served as a comparison group. Participants were administered a psychiatric interview and the Stimulus and Response Conflict Tasks (Nassauer & Halperin, 2003). Participants with childhood ADHD demonstrated slower and less accurate responses to both control and conflict conditions relative to the comparison group, as well as more variable responses in both conditions of the motor inhibition task; there was no specific effect of childhood ADHD on perceptual or motor inhibition. ADHD persisters and partial remitters did not differ in overall accuracy, speed or variability in responding, but relative to partial remitters, persisters demonstrated greater slowing in response to perceptual conflict. These findings are consistent with theories positing state regulation, but not inhibitory control deficits in the etiology of ADHD, and suggest that improved perceptual inhibition may be associated with better outcome for ADHD.
    Neuropsychology 07/2010; 24(4):424-34. DOI:10.1037/a0018752 · 3.43 Impact Factor

Similar Publications