Individual responses to novelty are associated with differences in behavioral and neurochemical profiles.

Department of Pharmacology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Behavioural Brain Research (Impact Factor: 3.39). 04/2008; 187(2):462-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.10.010
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Experimental animals can be differentiated on the basis of their horizontal or vertical activity to high responders (HR) and low responders (LR) upon exposure to a novel environment. These individual differences have been associated with behavioral and neurobiological differences in a number of experimental procedures used for studying sensitivity to psychostimulants, anxiety, depression, and cognitive function. In the present study, we differentiated the rats to HR and LR based on their vertical activity upon exposure to a novel environment. Additionally, we ascertained whether HR and LR rats differ in a battery of tests such as passive avoidance (PA), object recognition (OR), and the water-maze (WM) that provide indices for cognitive function and the forced swim test (FST), an animal model of affective responsivity and antidepressant-like activity. Potential differences in neurochemical indices between the two phenotypes were also examined. HR rats displayed impaired non-spatial object recognition memory, but enhanced spatial performance, as compared to LR rats. FST induced "depressive-like" symptoms in both phenotypes that were differently manifested in HR versus LR rats. Neurochemical findings revealed distinct differences in serotonergic and dopaminergic activity in the striatum and the prefrontal cortex of HR as compared to LR rats. The above results show that HR and LR rats exhibit important differences in a battery of tests related to cognitive performance or affective responsivity, which may be associated with differences in certain neurobiological parameters.

Download full-text


Available from: Zeta Papadopoulou-Daifoti, Jul 07, 2015
  • Source
    • "Interestingly, behavioral habituation as assessed by measuring motor activity was improved in CB1R knockout mice (Degroot et al., 2005). Habituation can be used as a model of non-associative learning and memory that reflects the organization of behavioral output (Thiel et al., 1998; Mogensen et al., 2003; Antoniou et al., 2008; Polissidis et al., 2010). In this context, novel findings regarding cannabinoids' effects on non-associative learning and memory will provide additional and important information on their role in modulating distinct features of cognition. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Endogenous and exogenous cannabinoids modulate learning and memory primarily via the cannabinoid type 1 receptor (CB1R). A variety of experimental procedures has focused on the role of CB1R in various aspects of learning and memory processes. However, the picture still remains unclear as there is a lack of information on the effects of relatively low doses of CB1R agonists in relation to their effects on locomotion. The present study sought to investigate CB1R activation, using a range of relatively low doses of the CB1R agonist WIN55,212-2, on multiple aspects of learning and memory in rats. For this purpose, non-associative learning was examined using the habituation of locomotion paradigm, recognition memory was evaluated with the novel object recognition task, and the radial water maze test was selected to assess rats’ spatial memory. The ability of the CB1R antagonist, SR141716A, to counteract WIN55,212-2-induced behavioral effects was also tested. WIN55,212-2 (0.3, but not 0.03 or 0.1 mg/kg) disrupted non-associative learning, different aspects of short- and long-term recognition memory (storage and retrieval) and retention of spatial memory. The 0.3 mg/kg dose of WIN55,212-2 also decreased ambulatory, but not vertical (rearing), activity in non-habituated rats. These effects appeared to be CB1R dependent since pretreatment with SR141716A (0.03 mg/kg) prevented the WIN55,212-2-induced behavioral effects. The present findings further support and extend the complex impact of exogenous cannabinoids on learning and memory in relation to their effects on locomotion.
    Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 09/2014; 124:58–66. DOI:10.1016/j.pbb.2014.05.014 · 2.82 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Thus, the study of individual differences in behavioral traits allows the identification of relevant information concerning such influencing factors [6]. The individual differences approach has been used, for example, to study critical elements underlying the development of anxiety-and depressionlike disorders [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Individual differences in the forced swimming test (FST) could be associated with differential temporal dynamics of gene expression and neurotransmitter activity. We tested juvenile male rats in the FST and classified the animals into those with low and high immobility according to the amount of immobility time recorded in FST. These groups and a control group which did not undergo the FST were sacrificed either one, six or twenty-four hours after the test. We analyzed the expression of the CRF, CRFR1, BDNF and TrkB in the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and nucleus accumbens as well as norepinephrine, dopamine, serotonin, glutamate, GABA and glutamine in the hippocampus and nucleus accumbens. Animals with low immobility showed significant reductions of BDNF expression across time points in both the prefrontal cortex and the nucleus accumbens when compared with non-swim control. Moreover, rats with high immobility only showed a significant decrease of BDNF expression in the prefrontal cortex six hours after the FST. Regarding neurotransmitters, only accumbal dopamine turnover and hippocampal glutamate content showed an effect of individual differences (i.e. animals with low and high immobility), whereas nearly all parameters showed significant differences across time points. Correlational analyses suggest that immobility in the FST, probably reflecting despair, is related to prefrontal cortical BDNF and to the kinetics observed in several other neurochemical parameters. Taken together, our results suggest that individual differences observed in depression-like behavior can be associated not only with changes in the concentrations of key neurochemical factors but also with differential time courses of such factors.
    Physiology & Behavior 04/2014; 128. DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.01.037 · 3.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Accordingly, several groups have used this approach to study anxiety-(Borta and Schwarting, 2005; Herrero et al., 2006; Antoniou et al., 2008) and depressionrelated behaviors (Taghzouti et al., 1999; Naudon and Jay, 2005; Enrı´quez-Castillo et al., 2008). On the other hand, the environment exerts a significant modulator effect on brain function and, therefore, it plays a relevant role in both normal and atypical development of the central nervous system (Heim et al., 2004; Paus, 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Animals with low and high immobility in the forced swimming test (FST) differ in a number of neurobehavioral factors. A growing body of evidence suggests that the exposure to enriched environments mediates a number of changes in the brain. Therefore, we studied if animals' individuality can somehow modulate the response to environmental stimuli. Male rats were classified according to their immobility time scores in the FST test session as animals with low, medium or high immobility. Then, rats from groups with low and high immobility were randomly distributed in two groups to be reared in different housing conditions (i.e., enriched and standard conditions) during eight weeks. Animals were subjected to the open field test (OFT) before and six weeks after the start of housing protocol. Rats with high immobility in the FST also showed high ambulation and high rearing time in the first OFT. Such findings were not observed in the second OFT. Conversely, an effect of environmental enrichment was found in the second OFT where enriched animals showed lower ambulation and higher grooming time than the standard control group. Rats were sacrificed after the housing protocol and neurochemical content and/or gene expression were studied in three different brain regions: the prefrontal cortex, the hippocampus and the nucleus accumbens. Rats with low immobility showed significantly higher accumbal 5-HT levels than animals with high immobility, whereas no neurochemical differences were observed between enriched and standard animals. Regarding expression data, however, an effect of enrichment on accumbal corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and its receptor 1 (CRFR1) levels was observed, and such effect depended on immobility levels. Thus, our results not only allowed us to identify a number of differences between animals with low and high immobility or animals housed in standard and enriched conditions, but also suggested that animals' individuality modulated in some way the response to environmental stimuli.
    Neuroscience 02/2014; 265. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.01.047 · 3.33 Impact Factor