Article

Staffing adequacy, supervisory support and quality of care in long-term care settings: staff perceptions.

The National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health STAKES, Helsinki, Finland.
Journal of Advanced Nursing (Impact Factor: 1.53). 01/2008; 60(6):615-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04443.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This paper is a report of a study to explore relationships between perceived care quality, self-assessed professional skills, and the perceptions of the quality-related factors.
The work in long-term care is more demanding than in the past. The quality of care is strongly related to the well-being and job satisfaction of staff. Those emerge in part through a perception of resources allocated to caring and also through a perception of the quality achieved.
Data were collected in Finland in 2002 using a questionnaire sent to the nursing staff working in 112 wards in 40 long-term care institutions monitoring their care with the Resident Assessment Instrument System. Institutions were invited to participate the survey. The response rate was 70.2% (n = 1262). The respondents represented 3.8% of nursing personnel working in long-term care institutions.
Staff members who perceived staffing levels as inadequate and supervisory support as insufficient had lower perceptions of their own professional skills and the quality of care. Perceptions of empowering support behaviour were more strongly associated to self-assessed skills and to perceived care quality than perceptions of skills-oriented support activities. Staff members with short professional training, older staff members and staff members with long work experience in the unit had lower perceptions of their professional skills than other groups.
The perception of adequate staffing and of sufficient supervisory support, especially empowering support increases the probability of perceiving the care quality as good. If supervisors concern themselves with staff members' perceptions, they can better identify the staffing needs and also the support needs of personnel.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
103 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research indicates significant differences between nurse cohorts in many work-related factors. This study compared nurse competence between three generational cohorts comprising the current nursing workforce. The Nurse Competence Scale was used to collect data for this cross-sectional study from 2052 nurses in a university hospital in Finland. Data were analysed statistically. Significant differences were found between nurse cohorts in their competence. The length of work experience had a significant impact on the development of competence. The oldest cohort, with the longest work experience, had the highest competence scores (70.1 on a visual analogue scale), and the youngest had the lowest (59.0). All cohorts were most competent in patient-related nursing tasks, in maintenance of professional competence and in ethical care. Nurses were weakest in the development of nursing practice and the use of evidence-based knowledge. Targeted interventions in teaching-coaching for different nurse generations are needed to ensure the maintenance of nurse competence and high-quality patient care.
    International Journal of Nursing Practice 04/2014; · 0.88 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the adequacy of resources (human and material) for provision of maternal health services at the primary health care (PHC) level in Nnewi, Nigeria.
    Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. 05/2014; 55(3):235-41.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and dimensionality of the instrument Quality in Psychiatric Care-Forensic In-Patient Staff (QPC-FIPS) and to describe the perceived quality of psychiatric care among forensic inpatient service staff. A sample of 348 forensic inpatient staff from 18 forensic wards in Sweden participated in the study. A confirmatory factor analysis revealed a seven-factor structure with item loadings > 0.50 on expected factors, indicating adequate psychometric properties. The staff’s ratings of quality of care were high, 94% being positive. The highest ratings were found for the secluded-environment dimension and the lowest for the secure-environment dimension. Several factors influenced the ratings of quality of care, for instance, staff’s time to perform their duties and staff’s age. It is concluded that the QPC-FIPS can give valuable information about staff’s perceptions of the quality of care provided at inpatient forensic psychiatric care services, which can be used to identify areas for quality improvement. Use of the QPC-FIPS is an easy and inexpensive way to evaluate quality in forensic inpatient care, preferably in conjunction with the QPC-FIP instrument developed for forensic inpatients and covering the same items and dimensions.
    Open Journal of Nursing 07/2013; 3(3):330-341.