Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses: systematic review

Cochrane Vaccines Field, Alessandria, Italy.
BMJ (online) (Impact Factor: 16.38). 02/2008; 336(7635):77-80. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39393.510347.BE
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To systematically review evidence for the effectiveness of physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.
Search strategy of the Cochrane Library, Medline, OldMedline, Embase, and CINAHL, without language restriction, for any intervention to prevent transmission of respiratory viruses (isolation, quarantine, social distancing, barriers, personal protection, and hygiene). Study designs were randomised trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and controlled before and after studies.
Of 2300 titles scanned 138 full papers were retrieved, including 49 papers of 51 studies. Study quality was poor for the three randomised controlled trials and most of the cluster randomised controlled trials; the observational studies were of mixed quality. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis of most data except that from six case-control studies. The highest quality cluster randomised trials suggest that the spread of respiratory viruses into the community can be prevented by intervening with hygienic measures aimed at younger children. Meta-analysis of six case-control studies suggests that physical measures are highly effective in preventing the spread of SARS: handwashing more than 10 times daily (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.57; number needed to treat=4, 95% confidence interval 3.65 to 5.52); wearing masks (0.32, 0.25 to 0.40; NNT=6, 4.54 to 8.03); wearing N95 masks (0.09, 0.03 to 0.30; NNT=3, 2.37 to 4.06); wearing gloves (0.43, 0.29 to 0.65; NNT=5, 4.15 to 15.41); wearing gowns (0.23, 0.14 to 0.37; NNT=5, 3.37 to 7.12); and handwashing, masks, gloves, and gowns combined (0.09, 0.02 to 0.35; NNT=3, 2.66 to 4.97). The incremental effect of adding virucidals or antiseptics to normal handwashing to decrease the spread of respiratory disease remains uncertain. The lack of proper evaluation of global measures such as screening at entry ports and social distancing prevent firm conclusions being drawn.
Routine long term implementation of some physical measures to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses might be difficult but many simple and low cost interventions could be useful in reducing the spread.

Download full-text


Available from: Chris Del Mar, Jun 23, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent efforts to control the spread of epidemic infectious diseases, such as the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak, the 2006 avian in uenza outbreak and 2009 in uenza A(H1N1) pandemic, have prompted health of cials to develop rapid screening processes to detect febrile patients. The ideal device for fever screening should be speedy, non-invasive and be able to accurately detect febrile patients with minimal inconvenience and disruption of human traf c. To this end, thermography has been proposed as a non-contact and non-invasive method for detecting fever. This paper is aimed at conducting a critical review of the effectiveness of thermographic mass blind fever screening in terms of correlation tests and operations. The overall effectiveness of thermographic fever screening is subject to various environmental and subject factors, and performance characteristics of the thermographic device employed. Furthermore, reported thermographic fever screening operations have produced high false discovery rates, resulting in high proportions of patients being mistakenly classi ed as febrile and subsequently being referred for medical examination. Nevertheless, thermography has signi cant potential to be a quick non-contact and non-invasive method for mass blind fever screening which helps reduce the workload of medical of cers. It is important that thermographic fever screening operations be carefully planned and conducted in order to yield the best possible results. Keywords: Thermographic mass blind fever screening; core body and skin temperatures; correlation; receiver operating characteristics (ROC); false discovery rate.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This comprehensive review outlines the impact of military-relevant respiratory infections, with special attention to recruit training environments, influenza pandemics in 1918 to 1919 and 2009 to 2010, and peacetime operations and conflicts in the past 25 years. Outbreaks and epidemiologic investigations of viral and bacterial infections among high-risk groups are presented, including (i) experience by recruits at training centers, (ii) impact on advanced trainees in special settings, (iii) morbidity sustained by shipboard personnel at sea, and (iv) experience of deployed personnel. Utilizing a pathogen-by-pathogen approach, we examine (i) epidemiology, (ii) impact in terms of morbidity and operational readiness, (iii) clinical presentation and outbreak potential, (iv) diagnostic modalities, (v) treatment approaches, and (vi) vaccine and other control measures. We also outline military-specific initiatives in (i) surveillance, (ii) vaccine development and policy, (iii) novel influenza and coronavirus diagnostic test development and surveillance methods, (iv) influenza virus transmission and severity prediction modeling efforts, and (v) evaluation and implementation of nonvaccine, nonpharmacologic interventions. Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
    Clinical Microbiology Reviews 06/2015; 28(3):743-800. DOI:10.1128/CMR.00039-14 · 16.00 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acute respiratory infections are prevalent and pose a constant threat to society. While the use of facemasks has proven to be an effective barrier to curb the aerosol spread of such diseases, its use in the local community is uncommon, resulting in doubts being cast on its effectiveness in preventing airborne infections during epidemics. We thus aimed to conduct a literature review to determine the factors that influence the use of facemasks as a primary preventive health measure in the community. A search for publications relating to facemask usage was performed on Medline, PubMed, Google, World Health Organization and Singapore government agencies' websites, using search terms such as 'facemask', 'mask', 'influenza', 'respiratory infection', 'personal protective equipment', 'disease prevention', 'compliance' and 'adherence'. Findings were framed under five components of the Health Belief Model: perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, perceived severity, perceived barriers and cues to action. We found that individuals are more likely to wear facemasks due to the perceived susceptibility and perceived severity of being afflicted with life-threatening diseases. Although perceived susceptibility appeared to be the most significant factor determining compliance, perceived benefits of mask-wearing was found to have significant effects on mask-wearing compliance as well. Perceived barriers include experience or perception of personal discomfort and sense of embarrassment. Media blitz and public health promotion activities supported by government agencies provide cues to increase the public's usage of facemasks. Complex interventions that use multipronged approaches targeting the five components of the Health Belief Model, especially perceived susceptibility, are needed to increase the use of facemasks in the community. Further studies are required to evaluate the effectiveness of implemented interventions.
    Singapore medical journal 03/2014; 55(3):160-7. DOI:10.11622/smedj.2014037 · 0.63 Impact Factor