A comparison of problem-based and traditional education on nursing students' critical thinking dispositions.

Dokuz Eylul Universitesi, Hemsirelik Yuksekokulu, Inciralti 35340, Izmir, Turkiye.
Nurse Education Today (Impact Factor: 1.46). 07/2008; 28(5):627-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2007.10.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Determining the critical thinking (CT) levels of students in undergraduate nursing schools is important in terms of establishing the methods of education that should be used. Although there is some evidence that active learning approaches like problem-based learning are effective in developing CT, the findings are inconclusive. This descriptive analytic study compared levels of critical thinking among senior nursing students (N=147) in two educational programs, one of which used a problem-based learning (PBL) model while the other used a traditional model. The California critical thinking disposition inventory (CCTDI) was used as a data collection tool. Comparisons between the groups were made using t-test analysis. There was a significant difference (p<0.05) between the critical thinking disposition scores of the seniors in the PBL school and those in the school implementing the traditional model. Analysis of sub-scale scores showed significant differences in truth-seeking and open-mindedness. These findings add to the evidence that the active and self-directed nature of PBL encourages students' ability to think critically, be tolerant of the ideas of others and evaluate conflicting information before reaching a conclusion.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We used Problem-Based Learning (PBL) as a new pedagogy in an intermediate composition course. Our course design was based in constructivist pedagogical practices, which suggest that knowledge is co-created through social interactions. Although professors have much to offer students, students can also learn important lessons through interactions with their peers. PBL makes it easier to implement the social and collaborative aspects of writing. Students began with a traditional teacher-led essay and progressed to subsequent writing assignments representing a variety of genres produced while working in teams. All three problems required students to independently apply student learning outcomes by analysing the writing situation for the concepts of discourse community, genre, and rhetoric. Each assignment was assessed using a rubric aligned with the course student learning outcomes. Students also completed self-assessments after each assignment. PBL allowed students to apply what they were learning in the classroom to contexts beyond the classroom in an immediate and relevant way. This article describes how PBL can enhance the development of an intermediate composition course.
    College Teaching 04/2013; 61(2):67-73.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Student evaluations of teaching (SET) are common and controversial, yet there is limited understanding of student perceptions of these evaluation tools. The authors examined an evidence-based SET tool for content validity using BSN, RN-to-BSN, and MSN student focus groups to explore individual question items and identify themes. Through communication and relationships with students, SET can influence teaching effectiveness and student learning, although student perceptions of individual items vary greatly.
    Nurse educator. 07/2014;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background & Objective: To offer a better care in complex clinical environments and with rapid changes in technology, nurses need to improve their problem-solving skill. Student-centered and active learning approaches are more effective in this regard. Hence, this study was to determine the effect of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) on nursing students' learning level. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 32 nursing students (in their fifth semester) who had chosen mental health course in Golestan University of Medical Sciences in 2007. The students were randomly divided into two groups of cases (8 persons) and controls (24 persons). Having applied PBL and lecture during the course, learning was evaluated via theoretical exams of similar content and cognitive level in two groups, right at the end and two months after the course. Data was analyzed using Mann-Whitney and independent t- Test. The level of significance was 0.05. Results: Most of the students, with a mean ( ± SD) age of 21.85(±1.97) years, were single (90.62%), and lived in a dormitory (75%). Although the mean scores were higher in cases compared to the controls two months after the course, there was no significant difference in both groups regarding overall learning. However, a significant difference was seen in different cognitive levels (P<0.0001); this implies that lecture based learning students got a better score in knowledge level whereas PBL students received a higher score in tests of analysis, synthesis and evaluation. Conclusion: our results suggest that although b oth forms of teaching were effective, PBL seemed to be more effective than Lecture Based Learning in improving knowledge level and constant learning. Keywords: Problem-Based Learning (PBL), Lecture-Based Learning (LBL), Nursing students,
    Strides Dev Med Educ. 01/2010; 7(1):17-25.