A role for synaptic inputs at distal dendrites: instructive signals for hippocampal long-term plasticity.

Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Neuron (Impact Factor: 15.98). 01/2008; 56(5):866-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.020
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Synaptic potentials originating at distal dendritic locations are severely attenuated when they reach the soma and, thus, are poor at driving somatic spikes. Nonetheless, distal inputs convey essential information, suggesting that such inputs may be important for compartmentalized dendritic signaling. Here we report a new plasticity rule in which stimulation of distal perforant path inputs to hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons induces long-term potentiation at the CA1 proximal Schaffer collateral synapses when the two inputs are paired at a precise interval. This subthreshold form of heterosynaptic plasticity occurs in the absence of somatic spiking but requires activation of both NMDA receptors and IP(3) receptor-dependent release of Ca(2+) from internal stores. Our results suggest that direct sensory information arriving at distal CA1 synapses through the perforant path provide compartmentalized, instructive signals that assess the saliency of mnemonic information propagated through the hippocampal circuit to proximal synapses.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The hippocampal CA1 field processes spatial information, but the relative importance of intra- vs. extra-hippocampal sources of input into CA1 for spatial behavior is unclear. To characterize the relative roles of these two sources of input, originating in the hippocampal field CA3 and in the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC), we studied effects of discrete neurotoxic lesions of CA3 or MEC on concurrent spatial and nonspatial navigation tasks, and on synaptic transmission in afferents to CA1. Lesions in CA3 or MEC regions that abolished CA3-CA1, or reduced MEC-CA1 synaptic transmission, respectively, impaired spatial navigation and unexpectedly interfered with cue response, suggesting that in certain conditions of training regimen, hippocampal activity may influence behavior otherwise supported by nonhippocampal neural networks. MEC lesions had milder and temporary behavioral effects, but also markedly amplified transmission in the CA3-CA1 pathway. Extensive behavioral training had a similar, but more modest effect on CA3-CA1 transmission. Thus, cortical input to the hippocampus modulates CA1 activity both directly and indirectly, through heterosynaptic interaction, to control information flow in the hippocampal loop. Following damage to hippocampal cortical input, the functional coupling of separate intra- and extra-hippocampal inputs to CA1 involved in normal learning may initiate processes that support recovery of behavioral function. Such a process may explain how CA3 lesions, which do not significantly modify the basic features of CA1 neural activity, nonetheless impair spatial recall, whereas lesions of EC input to CA1, which reduce the spatial selectivity of CA1 firing in foraging rats, have only mild effects on spatial navigation.
    Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 08/2014; 8:292. · 4.16 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Frequency modulated (FM) sweeps are common in species-specific vocalizations, including human speech. Auditory neurons selective for the direction and rate of frequency change in FM sweeps are present across species, but the synaptic mechanisms underlying such selectivity are only beginning to be understood. Even less is known about mechanisms of experience-dependent changes in FM sweep selectivity. We present three network models of synaptic mechanisms of FM sweep direction and rate selectivity that explains experimental data: (1) The 'facilitation' model contains frequency selective cells operating as coincidence detectors, summing up multiple excitatory inputs with different time delays. (2) The 'duration tuned' model depends on interactions between delayed excitation and early inhibition. The strength of delayed excitation determines the preferred duration. Inhibitory rebound can reinforce the delayed excitation. (3) The 'inhibitory sideband' model uses frequency selective inputs to a network of excitatory and inhibitory cells. The strength and asymmetry of these connections results in neurons responsive to sweeps in a single direction of sufficient sweep rate. Variations of these properties, can explain the diversity of rate-dependent direction selectivity seen across species. We show that the inhibitory sideband model can be trained using spike timing dependent plasticity (STDP) to develop direction selectivity from a non-selective network. These models provide a means to compare the proposed synaptic and spectrotemporal mechanisms of FM sweep processing and can be utilized to explore cellular mechanisms underlying experience- or training-dependent changes in spectrotemporal processing across animal models. Given the analogy between FM sweeps and visual motion, these models can serve a broader function in studying stimulus movement across sensory epithelia.
    PLoS ONE 12/2014; 9(12):e115196. · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) plays an important role in sculpting neural circuits to store information in the hippocampus, since motor learning and memory are thought to be closely linked with this type of synaptic plasticity. We built a computational model to study the potential learning rule by linearly changing the synaptic weight and number of the synapses involved. The main findings are the following: (i) changes in the synaptic weight and number of synapses can lead to different long-term changes in the synaptic efficacy; (ii) the first spike pair of two neurons exerts a great influence on the subsequent spike pair; a pre-post spiking pair reinforces the subsequent paired spiking, while a post-pre spiking pair depresses this paired spiking; (iii) when the synaptic weight and synaptic number change, the interval in the first spiking pair is reduced, which directly influences the first spiking pair, and (iv) when a stellate neuron is stimulated weakly or the capacitance of a CA1 pyramidal neuron is decreased, LTP is produced more easily than LTD; in the opposite case, LTD is produced more readily; an increase of the synaptic number can promote activation of CA1 pyramidal neurons.
    Neurophysiology 08/2014; Vol. 46(No. 4):300-307. · 0.17 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 1, 2014

Joshua T Dudman