Article

Anterior transposition compared with simple decompression for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, 2450 Riverside Avenue South, Room 200, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.23). 01/2008; 89(12):2591-8. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00183
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT There is currently no consensus on the optimal operative treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome. The objective of this meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials was to evaluate the efficacy of simple decompression compared with that of anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve in the treatment of this condition.
Multiple databases were searched for randomized, controlled trials on the outcome of operative treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome in patients who had not previously sustained trauma or undergone a surgical procedure involving the elbow. Two reviewers abstracted baseline characteristics, clinical scores, and motor nerve-conduction velocities independently. Data were pooled across studies, standard mean differences in effect sizes weighted by study sample size were calculated, and heterogeneity across studies was assessed.
We identified four randomized, controlled trials comparing simple decompression with anterior ulnar nerve transposition (two submuscular and two subcutaneous). In three studies that included a total of 261 patients, a clinical scoring system was used as the primary clinical outcome. There were no significant differences between simple decompression and anterior transposition in terms of the clinical scores in those studies (standard mean difference in effect size = -0.04 [95% confidence interval = -0.36 to 0.28], p = 0.81). We did not find significant heterogeneity across these studies (I(2) = 34.2%, p = 0.22). Two reports, on a total of 100 patients, presented postoperative motor nerve-conduction velocities; they showed no significant differences between the procedures (standard mean difference in effect size = 0.24 [95% confidence interval -0.15 to 0.63] in favor of simple decompression, p = 0.23; I(2) = 0%, p = 0.9).
The results of this meta-analysis suggest that there is no difference in motor nerve-conduction velocities or clinical outcome scores between simple decompression and ulnar nerve transposition for the treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow in patients with no prior traumatic injuries or surgical procedures involving the affected elbow. Confidence intervals around the points of estimate were narrow, which probably exclude the possibility of clinically meaningful differences. These data suggest that simple decompression of the ulnar nerve is a reasonable alternative to anterior transposition for the surgical management of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
74 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When performed alone, endoscopic carpal tunnel release and endoscopic cubital tunnel release are safe and effective surgical options for the treatment of carpal and cubital tunnel syndromes, respectively. However, there is currently no literature that describes the performance of both procedures concomitantly. We describe the results of 17 cases in which dual endoscopic carpal and cubital tunnel releases were performed for the treatment of concurrent carpal and cubital tunnel syndromes. A retrospective review of all patients in a single surgeon practice that presented with concomitant ipsilateral carpal and cubital tunnel syndromes was performed. Within an 8-month period, 17 patients had undergone 19 concomitant ipsilateral endoscopic carpal and cubital tunnel releases after failing conservative treatment. Pre- and postoperative measurements included subjective numbness/tingling; subjective pain; manual muscle testing of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB), intrinsics, and flexor digitorum profundus (FDP); static two-point discrimination; quick-DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) scores; grip strength; chuck pinch strength; and key pinch strength. Complete data are available for 15 patients and 17 total procedures. Thirteen male and four female patients (average age of 50.5) underwent dual endoscopic cubital and carpal tunnel release. Two patients were lost to follow-up and eliminated from data analysis. Pre- and postoperative comparisons were completed for median DASH scores, grip strength, chuck pinch strength, and key pinch strength at their preoperative visit and at 12 weeks. DASH scores improved significantly from a median of 67.5 to 16 (p = 0.002), grip strengths improved from 42 to 55.0 lbs (p = 0.30), chuck pinch strengths improved significantly from 11 to 15.5 lbs (p = 0.02), and key pinch strengths increased significantly from 13 to 18 lbs (p = 0.003). Average static two-point discrimination decreased from 5.9 to 4.8 mm. In terms of pain, 82 % of patients had complete resolution of pain, and the remaining 18 % experienced pain only with strenuous activity. In terms of numbness/tingling, 100 % of patients had complete resolution of median nerve symptoms; 88 % of patients had substantial improvement of numbness and tingling symptoms, and 12 % had residual ulnar nerve symptoms. In terms of muscle strength, 92 % of patients had improvement to 5/5 APB strength, while 100 % of patients had improvement to 5/5 intrinsic and FDP strengths. Two minor complications occurred, including one superficial hematoma and one superficial cellulitis. Preliminary data demonstrate that dual endoscopic carpal and cubital tunnel release is a safe and effective treatment option for patients who present with concurrent cubital and carpal tunnel syndromes recalcitrant to non-surgical management. Postoperative results and complications are comparable to endoscopic carpal and cubital tunnel releases performed alone.
    Hand 03/2014; 9(1):43-7.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anterior dislocation of the ulnar nerve is occasionally encountered after simple decompression of the nerve for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the incidence of dislocation of the nerve following simple decompression of the nerve is correlated with the patient's preoperative characteristics and/or elbow morphology. We studied 51 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome who underwent surgery at our institution. Intraoperatively, we simulated dislocation of the nerve after simple decompression by flexing the elbow after releasing the nerve in each patient. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis showed that young age and a small ulnar nerve groove angle are positively correlated with dislocation of the nerve. Our results suggest that patients who are young and/or have a sharply angled ulnar nerve groove identified radiographically have a high probability of experiencing anterior dislocation of the ulnar nerve after simple decompression.
    Hand Surgery 01/2014; 19(1):13-18.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective to compare the results from two of the most commonly used surgical techniques: in situ decompression and subcutaneous transposition. The processes of patients treated surgically in a public university hospital between January 2004 and December 2011 were reviewed. Cases of proximal compression of the nerve, angular deformity of the elbow and systemic diseases associated with non‐compressive neuropathy were excluded. Methods ninety‐seven cases were included (96 patients). According to the modified McGowan score, 14.4% of the patients presented grade Ia, 27.8% grade II, 26.8% grade IIb and 30.9% grade III. In situ neurolysis of the cubital was performed in 64 cases and subcutaneous anterior transposition in 33. Results according to the modified Wilson and Knout score, the results were excellent in 49.5%, good in 18.6%, only satisfactory in 17.5% and poor in 14.4%. In comparing the two techniques, we observed similar numbers of excellent and good results. Grades IIb and III were associated with more results that were less satisfactory or poor, independent of the surgical technique. Conclusion both techniques were shown to be efficient and safe for treating cubital tunnel syndrome.
    Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia 01/2014;