Problem solving in diabetes self-management and control - A systematic review of the literature

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
The Diabetes Educator (Impact Factor: 1.92). 11/2007; 33(6):1032-50; discussion 1051-2. DOI: 10.1177/0145721707308412
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the published literature on problem solving and its associations with diabetes self-management and control, as the state of evidence exists.
PubMed, PsychINFO, and ERIC electronic databases were searched for the years 1990 to the present and for English-language articles, and reference lists from included studies were reviewed to capture additional studies.
Quantitative and qualitative studies that addressed problem solving as a process or strategy for diabetes self-management were included. Fifty-two studies met the criteria for inclusion.
Study design, sample characteristics, measures, and results were reviewed.
Thirty-six studies were quantitative; 16 were conceptual or qualitative. Studies were classified as addressing the problem-solving definition/framework, assessment, intervention, or health care professional issues.
Problem solving is a multidimensional construct encompassing verbal reasoning/rational problem solving, quantitative problem solving, and coping. Aspects of problem solving can be assessed using newly developed diabetes-specific problem-solving measures for children/adolescents and adults. Cross-sectional studies in adults, but not children/adolescents, provide consistent evidence of associations between problem solving and A1C level. Only 25% of problem-solving intervention studies with children/adolescents and 50% of interventions with adults reported improvement in A1C. Most intervention studies reported an improvement in behaviors, most commonly global adherence in children/adolescents and dietary behavior in adults. Methodological limitations (noninclusion of problem-solving measures, inadequate descriptions of problem-solving interventions, homogenous samples) need to be addressed in future research to clarify the effect of problem solving on diabetes outcomes, identify characteristics of effective interventions, and determine the utility across age and racial/ethnic groups.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In low-income and underserved populations, financial hardship and multiple competing roles and responsibilities lead to difficulties in lifestyle change for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. To improve CVD prevention behaviors, we adapted, pilot-tested, and evaluated a problem-solving intervention designed to address barriers to lifestyle change. The sample consisted of 81 participants from 3 underserved populations, including 28 Hispanic or non-Hispanic white women in a western community (site 1), 31 African-American women in a semirural southern community (site 2), and 22 adults in an Appalachian community (site 3). Incorporating focus group findings, we assessed a standardized intervention involving 6-to-8 week group sessions devoted to problem-solving in the fall of 2009. Most sessions were attended by 76.5% of participants, demonstrating participant adoption and engagement. The intervention resulted in significant improvement in problem-solving skills (P < .001) and perceived stress (P < .05). Diet, physical activity, and weight remained stable, although 72% of individuals reported maintenance or increase in daily fruit and vegetable intake, and 67% reported maintenance or increase in daily physical activity. Study results suggest the intervention was acceptable to rural, underserved populations and effective in training them in problem-solving skills and stress management for CVD risk reduction.
    Preventing chronic disease 03/2014; 11:E32. DOI:10.5888/pcd11.130249 · 1.96 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ObjectiveaEuro integral To illustrate adolescent self-regulation as a foundation for both individual and interpersonal processes in adolescent chronic illness self-management.aEuro integral MethodaEuro integral Literature review.aEuro integral ResultsaEuro integral Research has identified multiple individual (e.g., self-efficacy, coping, and adherence) and interpersonal factors (parental monitoring and friend support) that are sources of risk and resilience to adolescent chronic illness self-management. In this article, we highlight literature consistent with the idea that self-regulation (including cognitive, emotional, and behavioral regulation) underlies both individual and interpersonal sources of risk and resilience across development.aEuro integral ConclusionsaEuro integral This self-regulation approach has multiple benefits: A parsimonious construct for explaining both individual and interpersonal processes that contribute to risk and resilience for chronic illness self-management, the incorporation of methods used in developmental and health psychology research, including performance-based, physiological, daily, and ecological momentary assessment, and a new look to interventions that target self-regulation as a way to improve individual and interpersonal processes in chronic illness self-management.
    Journal of Pediatric Psychology 09/2014; 39(10). DOI:10.1093/jpepsy/jsu067 · 2.91 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Purpose: A systematic review of stroke self-management programs was conducted to: (i) identify how many and what self-management support strategies were included in stroke self-management interventions and (ii) describe whether self-management programs effectively improved outcomes, focusing specifically on function and participation outcomes. Methods: Twelve databases were searched for the years 1986-2012 to identify self-management programs for stroke survivors. Pre-post, quasi-experimental and randomized controlled trial study designs were included. Descriptive information about the intervention was scrutinized to identify what self-management support strategies were present in the intervention and comparisons were made between programs using a group versus a one-to-one format. All outcomes were included and categorized. Results: The most prominent strategies identified in our review were goal setting and follow-up, and an individualized approach using structured information and professional support. There are indications that self-management programs can significantly increase participation and functional ability. However, the high level of clinical heterogeneity in program delivery, outcomes and level of stroke severity made it impossible to conduct a meta-analysis. Further examination of individual self-management support strategies, such as linking rehabilitation goal setting to post-acute self-management programs, the inclusion of family members and the contribution of peer-support is warranted. Implications for Rehabilitation Self-management programs for stroke survivors: Linking post-acute self-management programs to rehabilitation goal setting could improve outcomes. Involving family members in self-management programs may benefit stroke survivors.
    Disability and Rehabilitation 01/2015; DOI:10.3109/09638288.2014.996674 · 1.84 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 5, 2014