Advice to use topical or oral ibuprofen for chronic knee pain in older people: Randomised controlled trial and patient preference study

Centre for Health Sciences, Barts and The London, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 2AT.
BMJ (online) (Impact Factor: 16.38). 01/2008; 336(7636):138-42. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39399.656331.25
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine whether older patients with chronic knee pain should be advised to use topical or oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
Randomised controlled trial and patient preference study.
26 general practices.
People aged > or =50 with knee pain: 282 in randomised trial and 303 in preference study.
Advice to use topical or oral ibuprofen. Primary outcome measures WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) osteoarthritis index, major and minor adverse effects.
Changes in global WOMAC scores at 12 months were equivalent. In the randomised trial the difference (topical minus oral) was two points (95% confidence interval -2 to 6); in the preference study, it was one point (-4 to 6). There were no differences in major adverse effects in the trial or study. The only significant differences in secondary outcomes were in the randomised trial. The oral group had more respiratory adverse effects (17% v 7%,95% confidence interval for difference -17% to -2%), the change in serum creatinine was 3.7 mmol/l less favourable (0.9 micromol/l to 6.5 micromol/l); and more participants changed treatments because of adverse effects (16% v 1%, -16% to -5%). In the topical group more participants had chronic pain grade III or IV at three months, and more participants changed treatment because of ineffectiveness.
Advice to use oral or topical preparations has an equivalent effect on knee pain over one year, and there are more minor side effects with oral NSAIDs. Topical NSAIDs may be a useful alternative to oral NSAIDs.
ISRCTN 79353052.

Download full-text


Available from: Shahrul Mt-Isa, Aug 03, 2015
  • Source
    • "In the context of a randomised trial comparing treatments for knee OA, three studies reported patients' preferences for the treatments implemented. Underwood et al. (2007) offered patients the possibility of participating in a randomised trial or a preference study comparing topical versus oral ibuprofen for chronic knee pain. Among those who decided to participate in the preference study, 74% opted for the topical modality of the drug. "
    Osteoarthritis - Diagnosis, Treatment and Surgery, 03/2012; , ISBN: 978-953-51-0168-0
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Osteoarthritis is a common condition, typically treated with orally administered analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Chronic administration of NSAIDs, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs, i.e., duloxetine), and opioid medications (i.e., tramadol) is regularly associated with multiple, serious side effects, in part due to the route of administration. Transdermal delivery of NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen, represents a potentially alternative treatment for this inflammatory pain condition with a better therapeutic profile. Investigate the safety and efficacy of a novel transdermal ibuprofen formulation (VALE®-ibuprofen) containing 10% ibuprofen, compared to a placebo in a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial, for clinical improvement in patients with moderate to severe painful osteoarthritis of the knee. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind, multi-center Phase 2 clinical trial. An academic medical center, and private rheumatology and interventional pain management practices. The Phase 2 clinical study included patients with primary osteoarthritis in a single knee joint with a progression level of moderate to severe based in part on a grade II or III designation according to the Kellgren and Lawrence classification system. Patients received the corresponding, randomly assigned study formulation (VALE-ibuprofen or placebo) for application to the target knee at a dose of 2.0 grams of drug product (200 mg ibuprofen) twice daily for 14 days. The evaluation of the efficacy of the treatments utilized the widely accepted methods of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for the patients. The results indicate that the transdermal VALE-ibuprofen formulation was very well tolerated from a safety perspective during the 2-week trial and also produced significant, positive clinical improvements superior to the placebo in all clinical endpoints tested. In particular, the WOMACTotal and WOMACPhysical Functioning, for the VALE-ibuprofen, were superior compared to the placebo (P = 0.0283 and P = 0.0201, respectively). Other clinical endpoints including the WOMACPain, WOMACStiffness, and VASResting scores were superior to those obtained from the placebo group, trending towards statistical significance compared to placebo (P = 0.0811, 0.1103, and 0.0785, respectively). Based on the Patient and Physician Global Impression of Change survey, patient satisfaction slightly improved across both groups; however, no statistical significance was detectable as compared to the baseline. The sample size of 64 subjects in the final data analysis and the lack of including an orally administered drug group are limitations of this study. The use of transdermal VALE-ibuprofen has beneficial clinical effects on the pain levels experienced in some patients with moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee as measured by the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Indices for stiffness, pain, physical function, and total. Visual Analog Scales (VAS) tests, VASMotion and VASWeight-bearing, again while appeared superior to placebo, were not statistically different from placebo. NCT01496326.
    Pain physician 16(6):E749-E762. · 4.77 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To explore the factors that influence older people's decision making regarding use of topical or oral ibuprofen for their knee pain. Qualitative interview study nested within a randomised controlled trial and a patient preference study that compared advice to use oral or topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for knee pain in older people. 11 general practices. 30 people aged > or =50 with knee pain. Participants' decision making was influenced by their perceptions of the associated risk of adverse effects, presence of other illness, nature of their pain, advice received, and practicality. Although participants' understanding of how the medications worked was sometimes poor their decision making about the use of NSAIDs seemed logical and appropriate. Participants' model for treatment was to use topical NSAIDs for mild, local, and transient pain and oral NSAIDs for moderate to severe, generalised, and constant pain (in the absence of other more serious illness or risk of adverse effects). Participants showed marked tolerance and normalisation of adverse effects. Participants had clear ideas about the appropriate use of oral and topical NSAIDs. Taking such views into account when prescribing may improve adherence, judgment of efficacy, and the doctor-patient relationship. Tolerance and normalisation of adverse effects in these patients indicate that closer monitoring of older people who use NSAIDs might be needed.
    BMJ (online) 01/2008; 336(7636):142-5. DOI:10.1136/bmj.39401.699063.BE · 16.38 Impact Factor
Show more