Article

The ascent of cat breeds: Genetic evaluations of breeds and worldwide random-bred populations

Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Genomics (Impact Factor: 2.79). 02/2008; 91(1):12-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2007.10.009
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The diaspora of the modern cat was traced with microsatellite markers from the presumed site of domestication to distant regions of the world. Genetic data were derived from over 1100 individuals, representing 17 random-bred populations from five continents and 22 breeds. The Mediterranean was reconfirmed to be the probable site of domestication. Genetic diversity has remained broad throughout the world, with distinct genetic clustering in the Mediterranean basin, Europe/America, Asia and Africa. However, Asian cats appeared to have separated early and expanded in relative isolation. Most breeds were derived from indigenous cats of their purported regions of origin. However, the Persian and Japanese bobtail were more aligned with European/American than with Mediterranean basin or Asian clusters. Three recently derived breeds were not distinct from their parental breeds of origin. Pure breeding was associated with a loss of genetic diversity; however, this loss did not correlate with breed popularity or age.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Maria Longeri, Jan 06, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
183 Views
  • Source
    • ". Concerted efforts were made to collect unrelated cats when constructing this database. RB cats, which represented non-pedigreed, non-mixed breed, street, household and feral populations, were collected opportunistically as part of studies to examine the overall genetic diversity of cats [22] [23]. Although RB cats cannot be definitely proven to be unrelated, to maximize the likelihood of unrelatedness among samples, only one cat from an obvious litter for RB cats was selected and adult cats from shelters were sampled. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pet hair has a demonstrated value in resolving legal issues. Cat hair is chronically shed and it is difficult to leave a home with cats without some level of secondary transfer. The power of cat hair as an evidentiary resource may be underused because representative genetic databases are not available for exclusionary purposes. Mitochondrial control region databases are highly valuable for hair analyses and have been developed for the cat. In a representative worldwide data set, 83% of domestic cat mitotypes belong to one of twelve major types. Of the remaining 17%, 7.5% are unique within the published 1394 sample database. The current research evaluates the sample size necessary to establish a representative population for forensic comparison of the mitochondrial control region for the domestic cat. For most worldwide populations, randomly sampling 50 unrelated local individuals will achieve saturation at 95%. The 99% saturation is achieved by randomly sampling 60-170 cats, depending on the numbers of mitotypes available in the population at large. Likely due to the recent domestication of the cat and minimal localized population substructure, fewer cats are needed to meet mitochondria DNA control region database practical saturation than for humans or dogs. Coupled with the available worldwide feline control region database of nearly 1400 cats, minimal local sampling will be required to establish an appropriate comparative representative database and achieve significant exclusionary power. Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
    Forensic Science International: Genetics 11/2014; 16C:52-57. DOI:10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.11.017 · 3.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The relationship between humans and domestic cats originated 10 000 years ago when modern cats diverged from wildcat ancestors to live among Homo sapiens in the Middle East (South-West Asia) (Driscoll et al., 2009). These cat ancestors spread throughout the Old World and eventually were brought to the Americas, where they are not native, by European settlers less than 500 years ago (Lipinski et al., 2008). Today, domestic cats persist in the United States as popular and beloved pets; however, effective control of the 60–100 million feral cats living throughout the country remains problematic (Jessup, 2004). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Domestic cats are an important part of many Americans' lives, but effective control of the 60-100 million feral cats living throughout the country remains problematic. Although trap-neuter-vaccinate-return (TNVR) programmes are growing in popularity as alternatives to euthanizing feral cats, their ability to adequately address disease threats and population growth within managed cat colonies is dubious. Rabies transmission via feral cats is a particular concern as demonstrated by the significant proportion of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis associated with exposures involving cats. Moreover, TNVR has not been shown to reliably reduce feral cat colony populations because of low implementation rates, inconsistent maintenance and immigration of unsterilized cats into colonies. For these reasons, TNVR programmes are not effective methods for reducing public health concerns or for controlling feral cat populations. Instead, responsible pet ownership, universal rabies vaccination of pets and removal of strays remain integral components to control rabies and other diseases.
    Zoonoses and Public Health 07/2013; 61(4). DOI:10.1111/zph.12070 · 2.07 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "New samples were collected via a buccal (cheek) swab and extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit following the manufacturer's protocol. Thirty-eight STRs were genotyped in the 123 newly acquired cats following the PCR and analysis procedures of Lipinski et al. (2008). Unlinked non-coding autosomal SNPs (n = 169) were selected to evenly represent all autosomes from the 1.99 coverage cat genomic sequence, which was defined by one Abyssinian cat as resequencing data were not available at the time of selection (Pontius et al. 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Both cat breeders and the lay public have interests in the origins of their pets, not only in the genetic identity of the purebred individuals, but also in the historical origins of common household cats. The cat fancy is a relatively new institution with over 85% of its 40-50 breeds arising only in the past 75 years, primarily through selection on single-gene aesthetic traits. The short, yet intense cat breed history poses a significant challenge to the development of a genetic marker-based breed identification strategy. Using different breed assignment strategies and methods, 477 cats representing 29 fancy breeds were analysed with 38 short tandem repeats, 148 intergenic and five phenotypic single nucleotide polymorphisms. Results suggest the frequentist method of Paetkau (single nucleotide polymorphisms = 0.78, short tandem repeats = 0.88) surpasses the Bayesian method of Rannala and Mountain (single nucleotide polymorphisms = 0.56, short tandem repeats = 0.83) for accurate assignment of individuals to the correct breed. Additionally, a post-assignment verification step with the five phenotypic single nucleotide polymorphisms accurately identified between 0.31 and 0.58 of the misassigned individuals raising the sensitivity of assignment with the frequentist method to 0.89 and 0.92 for single nucleotide polymorphisms and short tandem repeats respectively. This study provides a novel multistep assignment strategy and suggests that, despite their short breed history and breed family groupings, a majority of cats can be assigned to their proper breed or population of origin, that is, race.
    Animal Genetics 11/2012; 44(3). DOI:10.1111/age.12008 · 2.21 Impact Factor
Show more