Effect of implant-supported or retained dentures on masticatory performance: a systematic review.

Removable Partial Denture Prosthodontics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (Impact Factor: 1.42). 01/2008; 98(6):470-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60147-4
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT While subjective patient-based measures have been increasingly recognized as critical outcomes for prosthodontic treatment, there continues to be a need to validate for patients what changes in masticatory function can be expected with the provision of new implant-supported or retained dentures.
The purpose of this review was to evaluate the critical factors impacting change in masticatory performance following the provision of new implant-supported or retained dentures.
Information retrieval followed a systematic approach using PubMed and the Cochrane Library. English articles published from 1966 to June 2007, in which the masticatory performance of subjects with implant-supported or retained dentures was assessed by objective methods and compared to performance with conventional dentures, were included. Ratings of the evidence provided in each article followed United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality recommendations.
From 281 articles identified, 18 peer-reviewed articles met prespecified criteria for inclusion. Specific outcomes of significance identified by these articles rated as level II are: (1) fixed implant-supported partial dentures do not provide significant improvement in masticatory performance compared to conventional removable partial dentures for Kennedy Class I and II partially edentulous mandibles; (2) the combination of a mandibular implant-supported or retained overdenture (IOD) and maxillary conventional complete denture (CD) provides significant improvement in masticatory performance compared to CDs in both the mandible and maxilla for a limited population having persistent functional problems with an existing mandibular CD due to severely resorbed mandible; and (3) the type of implant and attachment system for mandibular IODs has a limited impact. Specific outcomes of significance identified by articles rated as having a moderate level of evidence (level III) are: (1) mandibular fixed implant-supported complete dentures provide significant improvement in masticatory performance compared to mandibular CDs in subjects dissatisfied with their CDs; and (2) implant-supported mandibular resection dentures have an advantage over conventional dentures in masticatory performance on the defect side of the mouth.
Objective benefits in masticatory performance of implant-supported or retained dentures compared to conventional dentures are limited to a mandibular IOD in edentulous patients with a resorbed mandible and/or difficulty adapting to CDs.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose The aim was to assess influence of different prosthodontic rehabilitation options on improvement of orofacial esthetics, chewing function (CF) and oral health-related quality of life. Methods Patients treated with 70 conventional complete dentures (CDs), 38 implant-supported mandibular complete dentures opposed to maxillary CDs, 56 conventional removable partial dentures, 15 implant-supported removable partial dentures, 25 conventional fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and 59 implant-supported fixed partial dentures (IFPDs) were included. The survey was conducted using the three questionnaires: the OHIP-CRO14, the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-CRO) and the Chewing Function Questionnaire (CFQ), and administrated twice: at the baseline prior the therapy and 3 months after prosthodontic rehabilitation had been finished. Results The after-treatment scores were significantly better than the baseline scores (p ANOVA showed no significant difference for the OES after-treatment scores between different rehabilitation options and implant presence, but the OHIP14 and CFQ after-treatment scores were significantly better in FPD and IFPDs than in removable implant and conventional denture wearers. The score change was significantly higher in all implant removable denture patients for the OES, OHIP and CFQ. The lowest score change was registered in the FPD wearers. (p Conclusions Removable denture implant patients most benefited from implant support, but IFPD and FPD had the best after-treatment scores. The assessed clinical parameters may help dentists in choice of the best rehabilitation option with the highest treatment effect.
    Quality of Life Research 10/2014; 24(4). DOI:10.1007/s11136-014-0817-2 · 2.86 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although implant-retained overdenture allows edentulous patients to take higher occlusal forces than the conventional complete dentures, the biomechanical influences have not been explored yet. Clinically, there is limited knowledge and means for predicting localized bone remodelling after denture treatment with and without implant support. By using finite element (FE) analysis, this article provides an in-silico approach to exploring the treatment effects on the oral mucosa and potential resorption of residual ridge under three different denture configurations in a patient-specific manner. Based on cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scans, a 3D heterogeneous FE model was created; and the supportive tissue, mucosa, was characterized as a hyperelastic material. A measured occlusal load (63N) was applied onto three virtual models, namely complete denture, two and four implant-retained overdentures. Clinically, the bone resorption was measured after one year in the two implant-retained overdenture treatment. Despite the improved stability and enhanced masticatory function, the implant-retained overdentures demonstrated higher hydrostatic stress in mucosa (43.6kPa and 39.9kPa for two and four implants) at the posterior ends of the mandible due to the cantilever effect, than the complete denture (33.4kPa). Hydrostatic pressure in the mucosa signifies a critical indicator and can be correlated with clinically measured bone resorption, pointing to severer mandibular ridge resorption posteriorly with implant-retained overdentures. This study provides a biomechanical basis for denture treatment planning to improve long-term outcomes with minimal residual ridge resorption. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Biomechanics 12/2014; 48(3). DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.043 · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • Medical Journal Armed Forces India 02/2013; DOI:10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.11.014


Available from