Article

Biomechanical evaluation of rotator cuff repairs in a sheep model: suture anchors using arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches compared with transosseous sutures using traditional modified Mason-Allen stitches.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, D-37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Clinical Biomechanics (Impact Factor: 1.87). 03/2008; 23(3):291-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.10.010
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The optimal method for rotator cuff repair of the shoulder is not yet known. The aim of this study was to compare the time-dependent biomechanical properties of the traditional open transosseous suture technique and modified Mason-Allen stitches (group 1) versus the double-loaded suture anchors technique and so-called arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches (group 2) in rotator cuff repair.
Eighteen adult female sheep were randomized into two groups: in an open approach in which the released infraspinatus tendon was repaired with group 1, and with group 2. Animals were sacrificed at 6, 12, or 26 weeks; shoulders were harvested and magnetic resonance imaging was performed. Eight untreated contralateral shoulders served as controls. Tendons of 16 additional unpaired cadaver shoulder joints of adult female sheep were identically treated for analysis at time zero. In a biomechanical evaluation all specimens were loaded to failure at a constant displacement rate using a standard universal testing machine. The load-to-failure and stiffness of the healed bone-tendon interface were calculated.
Magnetic resonance imaging analysis showed cuff integrity in all cases, and no evidence of foreign body reaction to the anchors. Load-to-failure and stiffness data did not indicate any significant difference between the two treatment groups, neither at 6 weeks nor at 12 or 26 weeks. However, at time zero the group 2 had a higher load-to-failure in comparison to the group 1 (P<0.010), but there was no difference for the stiffness (P<0.121).
This in vivo study showed that, postoperatively, the group 2 technique provides superior stability and after healing would gain strength comparable to the group 1 technique.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
55 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the mechanical performance and initial strength of the arthroscopic Mason-Allen, double mattress, inclined Mason-Allen, and lasso loop stitch configurations. Using 36 sheep infraspinatus tendons, tendon widths and thicknesses were measured with a digital caliper to confirm standardization of the tendons. Four different stitch configurations (Mason-Allen, inclined Mason-Allen, double mattress, and lasso loop) were biomechanically tested with cyclic loading followed by load to failure testing. The cyclic elongation, peak-to-peak displacement, ultimate tensile strength, stiffness, and mode of failure were recorded. Mean tendon widths and thicknesses were statistically the same. The lasso loop (0.7 ± 0.1 mm) demonstrated a mean cyclic elongation greater than the Mason-Allen (0.5 ± 0.3 mm) and double mattress (0.5 ± 0.3 mm) groups (P = 0.011; P = 0.013). No differences were found in ultimate failure load, stiffness, and peak-to-peak displacement for the Mason-Allen (mean 99 ± 42 N, 39 ± 9 N/mm, 0.6 ± 0,1 mm), inclined Mason-Allen (113 ± 52 N, 44 ± 14 N/mm, 0.5 ± 0.1 mm), double mattress stitch (119 ± 68 N, 45 ± 10 N/mm, 0.5 ± 0.1 mm), or lasso loop (100 ± 38 N, 42 ± 7 N/mm, 0.5 ± 0.1 mm) groups (n.s.). Each specimen failed at the suture-tendon interface. Three specimens (two Mason-Allen and one inclined Mason-Allen) failed during cyclic testing. Conventional Mason-Allen configuration can be applied with double-loaded suture anchor safely. Recent modifications of the configurations offer no biomechanical advantage.
    Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy 11/2010; 19(10):1749-54. · 2.68 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the initial fixation strength of bridging techniques compared to other suture techniques for rotator cuff repair using a biomechanical animal model, which incorporated pretesting of intact tendons. METHODS: Seventy-six fresh bovine shoulders were used for testing seven suture configurations including simple suture (SS), mattress suture (MS), Mason-Allen (MA), modified double row (mDR), SpeedBridge (SpB), SpeedBridge with medial fixation (mSpB), and double-mattress SutureBridge (dmSuB) techniques. Cyclic loading was performed with all intact bone-tendon complex before (pretest) and after repair of the tendon (main test) at the level of 10 and 180 N at 100 Hz with displacement-controlled ramps of ±33 mm/s. The pretest was stopped after 200 cycles. For the main test, the loading scheme was continued for a maximum of 500 cycles or until failure. RESULTS: The mean elongation of all 76 intact tendons measured at the pretest was 3.8 ± 0.6 mm (2.4-5.4 mm). No differences of gap formations at the 1st cycle were detected between SS, MS, MA, and mDR. SpB showed significant higher gap formations compared to all other suture techniques (p = 0.001). No significant differences were detected between mSpB and dmSuB, whereas both techniques were significant different when compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, results showed that bridging techniques with medial fixations have superior initial repair strength compared to other suture techniques. Knowledge of initial fixation strength of rotator cuff repair techniques may be of informative value to the surgeon.
    Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy 02/2012; · 2.68 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neben vielfältigen Faktoren wie Lebensalter, Durchblutung, Größe sowie Alter der Rotatorenmanschettenruptur und fettiger Infiltration der Muskulatur ist die Refixationstechnik der Sehne ein wichtiger Faktor für eine erfolgreiche Behandlung. In den letzten Jahren hat sich eine breite Hinwendung zu arthroskopischen Operationstechniken vollzogen. Die schnelle Ausbreitung dieser Verfahren war nur durch komplette Neuentwicklungen der Refixationstechnik möglich.Wir stellen die wichtigsten Faktoren der aktuellen arthroskopischen Fixationstechnik der Rotatorenmanschette zusammen. Neben den verwendbaren Fäden und der Art der Nahtanker werden verschiedene Anordnungen der Nahtanker diskutiert. Biomechanisch bieten doppelreihige Nahtankeranordnungen bessere Voraussetzungen als einreihige, jedoch ist aus klinischer Sicht bisher kein klarer Vorteil nachgewiesen. Falls technisch möglich, bietet eine Doppelreihenrekonstruktion mit lateraler Verspannung der Fäden heute gute biomechanische Voraussetzungen, um eine verbesserte Einheilung der Sehne zu erreichen.
    Der Orthopäde 01/2011; 40(1). · 0.51 Impact Factor