Morphology-enhanced atrial event classification improves sensing in pacemakers.

Thorsten Lewalter, Ype Tuininga, Gerd Fröhlig, Susann Remerie, Frank Eberhardt, Jörg Schmidt, Chris Van Groeningen, Peter Wohlgemuth

Department of Cardiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Journal Article: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (impact factor: 1.58). 12/2007; 30(12):1455-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00891.x

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In atrial-based pacing, appropriate therapy and reliable diagnostics depend on detection and discrimination of atrial signals. Accurate classification of atrial events is mainly confounded by oversensing of ventricular far-field R-wave signals (FFRW), but attempts to reject FFRWs by manipulating atrial sensitivity and/or postventricular atrial blanking period (PVAB) may result in undersensing (especially of atrial fibrillation, AF) or in 2:1 atrial flutter detection. The objective of this study is therefore to evaluate if such methods can be improved by morphology-enhanced atrial event classification (MORPH). METHODS: Twenty-four-hour ambulatory atrial electrograms were recorded from continuous telemetry of digital pacemakers. Half of the recording was used for collecting two individual morphology parameters that discriminated P-waves from FFRWs in every patient (learning phase). The other half was used to test the MORPH algorithm against traditional methods (classification phase). RESULTS: In 44/48 patients, data were suitable for analysis. Average P and FFRW amplitudes were 1.96 mV versus 0.61 mV (P < 0.001). The interval between ventricular events and FFRW oversensing (VA interval) averaged at 14 ms during sensing and at 118 ms during pacing in the ventricle. Compared to nominal ("Factory") settings, the MORPH algorithm improved the sensitivity for P-wave recognition from 97.2% to 99.2%, the specificity from 91.9% to 99.96%, and the accuracy from 95.3% to 99.4% (P < 0.01 for all). CONCLUSIONS: By improving atrial signal discrimination, morphology analysis of atrial electrograms allows for high atrial sensitivity settings, and potentially improves the reliability of atrial arrhythmia diagnostics in heart rhythm devices.

Source: PubMed

Comments on this publication

ResearchGate members can add comments. Sign up now and post your comment!

Similar publications

Science & Research Jobs

Keywords

Accurate classification
 
ambulatory atrial electrograms
 
atrial arrhythmia diagnostics
 
atrial fibrillation
 
atrial sensitivity settings
 
atrial signal discrimination
 
atrial-based pacing
 
classification phase
 
FFRW amplitudes
 
FFRW oversensing
 
individual morphology parameters
 
manipulating atrial sensitivity
 
MORPH algorithm
 
morphology analysis
 
morphology-enhanced atrial event classification
 
postventricular atrial blanking period
 
reliable diagnostics
 
traditional methods
 
VA interval
 
ventricular far-field R-wave signals