Diabetes Risk Calculator: A simple tool for detecting undiagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes

Archimedes, San Francisco, California, USA.
Diabetes care (Impact Factor: 8.57). 06/2008; 31(5):1040-5. DOI: 10.2337/dc07-1150
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to develop a simple tool for the U.S. population to calculate the probability that an individual has either undiagnosed diabetes or pre-diabetes.
We used data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and two methods (logistic regression and classification tree analysis) to build two models. We selected the classification tree model on the basis of its equivalent accuracy but greater ease of use.
The resulting tool, called the Diabetes Risk Calculator, includes questions on age, waist circumference, gestational diabetes, height, race/ethnicity, hypertension, family history, and exercise. Each terminal node specifies an individual's probability of pre-diabetes or of undiagnosed diabetes. Terminal nodes can also be used categorically to designate an individual as having a high risk for 1) undiagnosed diabetes or pre-diabetes, 2) pre-diabetes, or 3) neither undiagnosed diabetes or pre-diabetes. With these classifications, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic area for detecting undiagnosed diabetes are 88%, 75%, 14%, 99.3%, and 0.85, respectively. For pre-diabetes or undiagnosed diabetes, the results are 75%, 65%, 49%, 85%, and 0.75, respectively. We validated the tool using v-fold cross-validation and performed an independent validation against NHANES 1999-2004 data.
The Diabetes Risk Calculator is the only currently available noninvasive screening tool designed and validated to detect both pre-diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes in the U.S. population.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Genetic testing for chronic disease susceptibility may motivate young adults for preventive behavior change. This nationally representative survey gave 521 young adults hypothetical scenarios of receiving genetic susceptibility results for heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and stroke and asked their (1) interest in such testing, (2) anticipated likelihood of improving diet and physical activity with high- and low-risk test results, and (3) readiness to make behavior change. Responses were analyzed by presence of established disease-risk factors. Respondents with high phenotypic diabetes risk reported increased likelihood of improving their diet and physical activity in response to high-risk results compared with those with low diabetes risk (odds ratio (OR), 1.82 (1.03, 3.21) for diet and OR, 2.64 (1.24, 5.64) for physical activity). In contrast, poor baseline diet (OR, 0.51 (0.27, 0.99)) and poor physical activity (OR, 0.53 (0.29, 0.99)) were associated with decreased likelihood of improving diet. Knowledge of genetic susceptibility may motivate young adults with higher personal diabetes risk for improvement in diet and exercise, but poor baseline behaviors are associated with decreased intention to make these changes. To be effective, genetic risk testing in young adults may need to be coupled with other strategies to enable behavior change.
    Journal of community genetics 02/2013; DOI:10.1007/s12687-013-0140-6
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to determine how college students perceive their risk of developing diabetes over their life course, with specific emphasis on their beliefs about the influence of inherited versus behavioral risk factors. A bivariate ordered probit regression model was used to simultaneously predict perceived risk for 10-year absolute risk of diabetes and lifetime absolute risk of diabetes. Ten-year and lifetime absolute risk were both increased when the respondent self-identified with a race/ethnicity other than non-Hispanic white (β = 0.42, p < .001 and β = 0.33, p = .004, respectively), and when the respondent had an increasing number of family members with diabetes (β = 0.33, p < .001 and β = 0.45, p < .001, respectively). Beliefs linking behavioral risk factors to perceived risk of developing diabetes across the life course were not statistically significant. The absence of significant association between perceptions of behavioral risk as factors for developing diabetes and perceived risk for diabetes over the life course supports the need for educational interventions about behavioral and genetic causes of diabetes among the college-aged population.
    Journal of Health Psychology 06/2011; 17(2):285-96. DOI:10.1177/1359105311412840 · 1.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present study aimed to validate the Finnish Type 2 Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) questionnaire for its ability to predict the presence of any glucose homoeostasis abnormalities and the metabolic syndrome (MetS) in the Greek population. Validation was performed on a sample of individuals who had agreed to participate in a screening program for type 2 diabetes (T2D) prevention (the Greek part of the DE-PLAN study), using both FINDRISC and oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT). Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) was defined as a fasting plasma glucose level of 6.1-6.9 mmol/L, and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) as a 2-h plasma glucose of 7.8-11.0 mmol/L. The predictive value of the FINDRISC was cross-sectionally evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve method. A total of 869 individuals (379 men, aged 56.2 ± 10.8 years) were screened from the general population living in the city and suburbs of Athens. OGTT revealed the presence of unknown diabetes in 94 cases (10.8%), IFG in 85 (9.8%) and IGT in 109 (12.6%). The sensitivity of a FINDRISC score greater or equal to 15 (45% of the population) to predict unknown diabetes was 81.9% and its specificity was 59.7%. The AUROC curve for detecting unknown diabetes was 0.724 (95% CI: 0.677-0.770). For any dysglycaemia, the AUROC curve was 0.716 (0.680-0.752) while, for detection of the MetS, it was 0.733 (0.699-0.767). The FINDRISC questionnaire performed well as a screening tool for the cross-sectional detection of unknown diabetes, IFG, IGT and the MetS in the Greek population.
    Diabetes & Metabolism 12/2010; 37(2):144-51. DOI:10.1016/j.diabet.2010.09.006 · 2.85 Impact Factor