Combined Pharmacotherapies and Behavioral Interventions for Alcohol Dependence (The COMBINE Study): Examination of Posttreatment Drinking Outcomes

Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute, 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 120, Seattle, Washington 98105-4631, USA.
Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs (Impact Factor: 2.27). 01/2008; 69(1):5-13. DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2008.69.5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of pharmacological and behavioral interventions across 1 year posttreatment in the COMBINE (Combining Medications and Behavioral Interventions) Study.
Alcohol-dependent individuals (N = 1,383; 428 women) recruited at 11 outpatient academic alcoholism-treatment clinics across the United States participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. They received 16 weeks of naltrexone (Revia) or acamprosate (Campral) or both medications and/or placebos in combination with medical management (MM), with or without combined behavioral intervention (CBI); one group received CBI without pills or MM. Drinking behavior and clinical status were assessed at the end of treatment (Week 16) and at Weeks 26, 52, and 68.
Prior treatment with active naltrexone, without active acamprosate or CBI or with active acamprosate plus CBI, and CBI with double placebo resulted in a significantly higher percentage of days abstinent than double placebos with no CBI (p < .05). Having received CBI was associated with positive clinical response posttreatment, compared with not having received CBI. Prior treatment with naltrexone increased the time to the first heavy-drinking day posttreatment (p = .03). No differences were found between patients who had received CBI without MM or pills and those having received MM and double placebo with or without CBI. No significant main effects for acamprosate were found on any of the outcome measures.
Previous treatment with MM and either CBI or naltrexone, or both, but not acamprosate, was associated with sustained efficacy beyond discontinuation. Reasons for the maintained treatment gains with naltrexone and/or CBI and potential methods to extend them are discussed.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Oral naltrexone is an efficacious medication for treatment of alcohol dependence, but small effect sizes and variability in outcomes suggest the presence of person-level moderators of naltrexone response. Identification of contextual or psychosocial moderators may assist in guiding clinical recommendations. Given the established importance of social networks in drinking outcomes, as well as the potential effects of naltrexone in reducing cue reactivity which may be especially important among those with more heavy drinkers and more alcohol cues in their networks, we examined pretreatment social network variables as potential moderators of naltrexone treatment effects in the COMBINE study.Methods The sample included all COMBINE study participants in medication conditions with full data on the Important People Inventory (IPI) and covariates at intake (N = 1,197). The intake IPI assessed whether participants had any frequent drinkers in their network and the average frequency of contact with these drinkers. The effects of treatment condition, pretreatment network variables, and their interactions on percent heavy drinking days were tested in hierarchical linear models, controlling for demographics and baseline clinical covariates.ResultsIn treatment conditions involving medical management and combined behavioral intervention (CBI), the effects of active naltrexone on heavy drinking were significantly greater for individuals with frequent drinkers in their network (z = −2.66, p < 0.01) and greater frequency of contact with those drinkers (z = −3.19, p < 0.01). These network variables did not moderate the effects of active naltrexone without CBI.Conclusions When delivered in conjunction with behavioral interventions, naltrexone can be more potent for alcohol-dependent adults who have greater contact with frequent drinkers prior to treatment, which may indicate patterns of environmental exposure to alcohol. Contextual, social risk factors are a potential avenue to guide personalized treatment of alcohol dependence.
    Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research 01/2015; 39(1). DOI:10.1111/acer.12605 · 3.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the high prevalence of prescription opioid dependence in the U.S., little is known about the course of this disorder and long-term response to treatment. We therefore examined 18-month post-randomization outcomes of participants in the Prescription Opioid Addiction Treatment Study, a multi-site, randomized controlled trial examining varying durations of buprenorphine-naloxone treatment and different intensities of counseling for prescription opioid dependence. Thus the current follow-up study provides a unique contribution to the field by reporting longer-term outcomes of a well-characterized population of treatment-seeking prescription opioid dependent patients. Participants from the treatment trial (N = 252/653) completed an 18-month follow-up telephone assessment. Multivariable analyses examined associations between participant characteristics and key indicators of month-18 status: opioid abstinence, DSM-IV opioid dependence, and opioid agonist treatment. Overall, participants showed improvement from baseline to month 18: 49.6% were abstinent in the previous 30 days, with only 16.3% opioid-dependent. Some participants, however, had initiated past-year heroin use (n = 9) or opioid injection (n = 17). Most participants (65.9%) engaged in substance use disorder treatment during the past year, most commonly opioid agonist therapy (48.8%). Of particular interest in this population, multivariable analysis showed that greater pain severity at baseline was associated with opioid dependence at 18 months. In conclusion, although opioid use outcomes during the treatment trial were poor immediately following a buprenorphine-naloxone taper compared to those during 12 weeks of buprenorphine-naloxone stabilization, opioid use outcomes at 18-month follow-up showed substantial improvement over baseline and were comparable to the rate of successful outcomes during buprenorphine-naloxone stabilization in the treatment trial.
    Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 08/2014; 48(1). DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2014.07.009 · 3.14 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As a primary point of contact within the health care system, family physicians are able to play a vital role in identifying individuals with substance use disorders and connecting them to the appropriate treatment. However, there is very little data available on whether family physicians are actively screening for and treating substance use disorders. The objective of the current survey was to assess whether family physicians in Ontario are screening for alcohol, opioid and tobacco use disorders, using validated tools and providing treatment. An online survey consisting of a series of 38 primarily close-ended questions was circulated to family physicians in Ontario. Rates of screening for alcohol, opioid and tobacco dependence, use of validated tools for screening, providing treatment for dependent individuals and the current barriers to the prescription of pharmacotherapies for these drug dependences were assessed. The use of validated screening tools was limited for all three substances. Screening by family physicians for the substance use disorders among adolescents was much lower than screening among adults. Pharmacotherapy was more commonly used as an intervention for tobacco dependence than for alcohol and opioid dependence. This was explained by the lack of knowledge among family physicians on the pharmacotherapies for alcohol and opioid dependence. Findings from the current study suggest there is a need for family physicians to integrate screening for substance use disorders using validated tools into their standard medical practice. Furthermore, there is a need for increased knowledge on pharmacotherapies for alcohol and opioid use disorders. It is important to note that the low response rate is a major limitation to this study. One possible reason for this low response rate may be a lack of interest and awareness among family physicians on the importance of screening and treatment of substance use disorders in Ontario.
    PLoS ONE 04/2015; 10(4):e0124402. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0124402 · 3.53 Impact Factor