Trunk density profile estimates from dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Department of Health and Human Performance, Texas A&M - Commerce, P.O. Box 3011, Commerce, TX 75429, USA.
Journal of Biomechanics (Impact Factor: 2.72). 02/2008; 41(4):861-7. DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.10.022
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Accurate body segment parameters are necessary to estimate joint loads when using biomechanical models. Geometric methods can provide individualized data for these models but the accuracy of the geometric methods depends on accurate segment density estimates. The trunk, which is important in many biomechanical models, has the largest variability in density along its length. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to: (1) develop a new method for modeling trunk density profiles based on dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and (2) develop a trunk density function for college-aged females and males that can be used in geometric methods. To this end, the density profiles of 25 females and 24 males were determined by combining the measurements from a photogrammetric method and DXA readings. A discrete Fourier transformation was then used to develop the density functions for each sex. The individual density and average density profiles compare well with the literature. There were distinct differences between the profiles of two of participants (one female and one male), and the average for their sex. It is believed that the variations in these two participants' density profiles were a result of the amount and distribution of fat they possessed. Further studies are needed to support this possibility. The new density functions eliminate the uniform density assumption associated with some geometric models thus providing more accurate trunk segment parameter estimates. In turn, more accurate moments and forces can be estimated for the kinetic analyses of certain human movements.

0 0
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As accurate body segment inertial parameters (BSIPs) are difficult to obtain in motion analysis, this study computed individual BSIPs from DXA scan images. Therefore, by co-registering areal density data with DXA grayscale image, the relationship between pixel color gradient and the mass within the pixel area could be established. Thus, one can calculate BSIPs, including segment mass, center of mass (COM) and moment of inertia about the sagittal axis (Ixx). This technique calculated whole body mass very accurately (%RMSE of < 1.5%) relatively to results of the generic DXA scanner software. The BSIPs of elite male and female swimmers, and young adult Caucasian males (n = 28), were computed using this DXA method and 5 other common indirect estimation methods. A 3D surface scan of each subject enabled mapping of key anthropometric variables required for the 5 indirect estimation methods. Mass, COM and Ixx were calculated for seven body segments (head, trunk, head + trunk, upper arm, forearm, thigh and shank). Between-group comparisons of BSIPs revealed that elite female swimmers had the lowest segment masses of the three groups (p < 0.05). Elite male swimmers recorded the greatest inertial parameters of the trunk and upper arms (p < 0.05). Using the DXA method as the criterion, the five indirect methods produced errors greater than 10% for at least one BSIP in all three populations. Therefore, caution is required when computing BSIPs for elite swimmers via these indirect methods, DXA accurately estimated BSIPs in the frontal plane. Key PointsElite swimmers have significantly different body segment inertial parameters than young adult Caucasian males.The errors computed from indirect BSIP estimation methods are large regardless whether applied to elite swimmers or young adult Caucasian males.No indirect estimation method consistently performed best.
    Journal of sports science & medicine 01/2013; 12(4):761-75. · 0.89 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Human modeling and the biomechanical analysis of human movement require the accurate estimation of body segment parameters for various populations and individuals. In this study, the body characteristics of adult Koreans were investigated using three-dimensional range scan data for 40 males and 40 females aged between 18 and 59 years obtained from the SizeKorea anthropometric database. Each subject was divided into 16 segments, and the mass-inertial parameters of each segment were calculated under the assumption of a uniform density distribution for the segment. The length and at least one circumference of each segment were determined from the scan data for that segment. Nonlinear regression equations were then derived based on the segment lengths and circumferences. The body segment parameters of Korean adults can be estimated using these equations if the required dimensions are measured directly or derived from an anthropometric database.
    Applied ergonomics 01/2011; 42(2):297-308. · 1.11 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Classical models to estimate the head and trunk (HT) moments of inertia (I) are limited to populations from which the anthropometric measures were obtained. The purposes of this study were to determine if the angular momentum technique can be used to estimate subject-specific HT's I values and test its validity and sensitivity. Twenty-three adults who participated in this study were divided into three morphological groups according to their body mass index (BMI). Using the proposed technique, the HT's I values were estimated for the whole sample and compared to three well-known methods to test its validity. The sensitivity of the proposed method was verified while applied to individuals with different BMI (i.e., lean, normal, and obese). The angular momentum technique gave I values within the range of those of the three methods for the entire sample. Statistical differences were identified between the lean and obese groups in relative radii of gyration for the anteroposterior and mediolateral axes ( P<0.05). Since the proposed technique makes no assumption on the mass distribution and segments' geometry, it appeared to be more sensitive to body morphology changes in estimating the HT's I values in lean and obese subjects compared to the classical methods.
    IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering 12/2010; 58(5):1278-85. · 2.15 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Aug 16, 2013