Immediately loaded titanium implant with a tissue-stabilizing/maintaining design ('beyond platform switch') retrieved from man after 4 weeks: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. A case report.

Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy, and Private Practice, Bologna, Italy.
Clinical Oral Implants Research (Impact Factor: 3.43). 04/2008; 19(3):276-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01449.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT After implant insertion and loading, crestal bone usually undergoes remodeling and resorption. If the horizontal relationship between the outer edge of the implant and a smaller-diameter component ('platform switching') is altered, there seems to be reduced crestal bone loss. Immediate loading allows immediate restoration of esthetics and function, reduces morbidity, and facilitates functional rehabilitation.
Three Morse cone connection implants were inserted in the right posterior mandible in a 29-year-old partially edentulous patient. The platform of the implant was inserted 2 mm below the level of the alveolar crest. After a 1-month loading period, the most distal mandibular implant was retrieved with a trephine bur for psychological reasons.
At low-power magnification, it was possible to see that bone was present 2 mm above the level of the implant shoulder. No resorption of the coronal bone was present. No infrabony pockets were present. At the level of the shoulder of the implant, it was possible to observe the presence of dense connective tissue with only a few scattered inflammatory cells. Newly formed bone was found in direct contact with the implant surface. The bone-implant contact percentage was 65.3+/-4.8%.
Abutments smaller than the diameter of the implant body (platform switching) in combination with an absence of micromovement and microgap may protect the peri-implant soft and mineralized tissues, explaining the observed absence of bone resorption. Immediate loading did not interfere with bone formation and did not have adverse effects on osseointegration.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this randomised clinical trial was to evaluate the influence of restoration on marginal bone loss (MBL) using immediately definitive abutments (one abutment–one time concept) versus provisional abutments later replaced by definitive abutments. In three private clinics, 32 patients with 32 hopeless maxillary premolars were selected for post-extractive implant-supported immediate restoration and randomised to provisional abutment (PA) and definitive abutment (DA) groups, 16 sites in each group. After tooth extraction, 7 patients had to be excluded for buccal wall fracture at tooth extraction or lack of sufficient primary implant stability (< 35 Ncm). The remaining 25 patients (10 PA, 15 DA) received a post-extractive wide-diameter implant. Immediately after insertion, the PA group were immediately restored using a platform-switched provisional titanium abutment. In the DA group, definitive platform-switched titanium abutments were tightened. In both groups, provisional crowns were adapted, avoiding occlusal contacts. All implants were definitively restored after 3 months. In the PA group, a traditional impression technique with coping transfer was adopted, dis/reconnecting abutments several times; in the DA group, metal prefabricated copings were used and final restorations were seated, avoiding abutment disconnection. Digital standardised periapical radiographs using a customised film holder were recorded at baseline (T₀ = implant insertion), final restoration (T₁ = 3 months later), and at 18-month (T₂) and 3-year (T₃) follow-ups. The MBL was evaluated with a computerised measuring technique and digital subtraction radiography (DSR) software was used to evaluate radiographic density. At the 3-year follow-up a success rate of 100% in both groups was reported. In the PA group, peri-implant bone resorption was 0.36 mm at T₁, 0.43 mm at T₂, and 0.55 mm at T₃. In the DA group, peri-implant bone resorption was 0.35 mm at T₁, 0.33 mm at T₂, and 0.34 mm at T₃. Statistically significant lower bone losses were found at T₂ (0.1 mm) and T₃ (0.2 mm) for the DA group. At T₃, significantly higher DSR values around implant necks were recorded in the DA group (72 ± 5.0) when compared with the PA group (52 ± 9.5). The current trial suggests that the 'one abutment–one time' concept might be a possible additional strategy in post-extraction immediately restored platform-switched single implants to further minimise peri-implant crestal bone resorption, although a 0.2 mm difference may not have any clinical effect. Additional clinical trials with larger groups of patients should be performed to better investigate this hypothesis.
    European Journal of Oral Implantology 01/2010; 3(4):285-96. · 2.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This prospective clinical study evaluated the incidence of abutment loosening of Morse taper-connection implants used for single-tooth replacement. In addition, the cumulative survival rate and the implant/crown success were evaluated. Implants were evaluated 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after insertion. The incidence of abutment loosening, modified Plaque Index, modified Sulcus Bleeding Index, probing depth, distance from the implant-crown margin to the coronal border of the peri-implant mucosa, width of keratinized mucosa, and the distance between implant shoulder and first bone-implant contact (DIB) were assessed. The cumulative survival rates were calculated with Kaplan-Meier estimates. Implant/crown success criteria included absence of abutment loosening, absence of suppuration and mobility, probing depth < 5.0 mm, and DIB < 1.5 mm after 12 months and not exceeding 0.2 mm for each following year. Over a 4-year period (2003-2007; mean follow-up per implant: 30.79 months), 307 implants (162 maxillary, 145 mandibular) were inserted in 295 patients (125 men and 170 women aged between 24 and 79 years) at six different clinical centers. The sites included anterior (n = 115) and posterior (n = 192) teeth. At the end of the study, a very low percentage of implant-abutment loosening (0.66%) was found, with only two loosened abutments. The cumulative implant survival rate was 98.4%. Mean DIB was 1.14 mm (48 months). Only four surviving implants did not meet the criteria for success, and the implant/crown success rate was 97.07%. Based upon this study of 307 implants observed during a 4-year period, Morse taper-connection implants represent a good solution for single-tooth restorations, with a very low incidence of abutment loosening (0.66%).
    The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 01/2010; 25(2):394-400. · 1.91 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate crestal bone loss around 282 two-piece implants with straight (n = 193) and platform-switched (n = 89) abutment connections after placement at various crestal levels. Implants were assigned into two groups according to straight and platform-switched abutment connections. Each group was further subdivided into three groups depending on the location (supracrestal, crestal, or subcrestal) of the implant cervical platform. Linear measurements of bone resorption were made from the implant's platform to the first point of bone-to-implant contact at the time of implant placement and 2 years postrestoration. Data were statistically analyzed. Statistically significant differences were found between subgroups in both straight and platform-switched categories. The only nonstatistically significant difference (P = .341) arose when comparing the supra- and subcrestal locations in the straight abutment connection group. The platform-switched group exhibited significantly less bone loss (P = .046) only in subcrestal locations. The platform-switched concept was not beneficial during the overall comparison, but it was for the subcrestal location of the abutment connection. Crestal placement of the implant-abutment connection resulted in higher marginal bone resorption in both straight and platform-switched abutments.
    The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry 12/2010; 30(6):609-17. · 1.08 Impact Factor