Article

Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

Health Assessment Lab and QualityMetric Incorporated, 275 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA 02451, USA.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (Impact Factor: 5.48). 01/2008; 61(1):17-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.025
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was initiated to improve precision, reduce respondent burden, and enhance the comparability of health outcomes measures. We used item response theory (IRT) to construct and evaluate a preliminary item bank for physical function assuming four subdomains.
Data from seven samples (N=17,726) using 136 items from nine questionnaires were evaluated. A generalized partial credit model was used to estimate item parameters, which were normed to a mean of 50 (SD=10) in the US population. Item bank properties were evaluated through Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) simulations.
IRT requirements were fulfilled by 70 items covering activities of daily living, lower extremity, and central body functions. The original item context partly affected parameter stability. Items on upper body function, and need for aid or devices did not fit the IRT model. In simulations, a 10-item CAT eliminated floor and decreased ceiling effects, achieving a small standard error (< 2.2) across scores from 20 to 50 (reliability >0.95 for a representative US sample). This precision was not achieved over a similar range by any comparable fixed length item sets.
The methods of the PROMIS project are likely to substantially improve measures of physical function and to increase the efficiency of their administration using CAT.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Jakob B Bjorner, Jun 30, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
180 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: "Active aging" connotes a radically nontraditional paradigm of aging which posits possible improvement in health despite increasing longevity. The new paradigm is based upon postponing functional declines more than mortality declines and compressing morbidity into a shorter period later in life. This paradigm (Compression of Morbidity) contrasts with the old, where increasing longevity inevitably leads to increasing morbidity. We have focused our research on controlled longitudinal studies of aging. The Runners and Community Controls study began at age 58 in 1984 and the Health Risk Cohorts study at age 70 in 1986. We noted that disability was postponed by 14 to 16 years in vigorous exercisers compared with controls and postponed by 10 years in low-risk cohorts compared with higher risk. Mortality was also postponed, but too few persons had died for valid comparison of mortality and morbidity. With the new data presented here, age at death at 30% mortality is postponed by 7 years in Runners and age at death at 50% (median) mortality by 3.3 years compared to controls. Postponement of disability is more than double that of mortality in both studies. These differences increase over time, occur in all subgroups, and persist after statistical adjustment.
    Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research 10/2012; 2012:420637. DOI:10.1155/2012/420637
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Compression of Morbidity hypothesis-positing that the age of onset of chronic illness may be postponed more than the age at death and squeezing most of the morbidity in life into a shorter period with less lifetime disability-was introduced by our group in 1980. This paper is focused upon the evolution of the concept, the controversies and responses, the supportive multidisciplinary science, and the evolving lines of evidence that establish proof of concept. We summarize data from 20-year prospective longitudinal studies of lifestyle progression of disability, national population studies of trends in disability, and randomized controlled trials of risk factor reduction with life-style-based "healthy aging" interventions. From the perspective of this influential and broadly cited paradigm, we review its current history, the development of a theoretical structure for healthy aging, and the challenges to develop coherent health policies directed at reduction in morbidity.
    Journal of aging research 08/2011; 2011:261702. DOI:10.4061/2011/261702
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Die Bedeutung der individuellen Gesundheit wie auch der gesundheitlichen Situation von Bevölkerungsgruppen ist vor dem Hintergrund knapper werdender Ressourcen für Gesundheitsdienstleistungen in den letzten Jahren immer stärker in den Blickpunkt der Öffentlichkeit, der Medien und der politischen Entscheidungsträger gerückt. Epidemiologische Studien zur gesundheitlichen Situation der Bevölkerung bzw. einzelner Bevölkerungsgruppen können durch die Erfassung gesundheitlicher Unterschiede der Identifikation von Risikogruppen und Risikofaktoren aber auch der Bestimmung des Behandlungs- oder Versorgungsbedarfes dienen und z.B. eine Unterversorgung aufdecken. Die Erfassung der Mortalität und Morbidität im Rahmen statistischer Routinedaten etwa ermöglicht es die Bedeutung sozialer Ungleichheit für den Gesundheitszustand der Bevölkerung abzuschätzen. Wiederholte Erhebungen können Gesundheitstrends erkennen lassen, die beispielsweise mit Veränderungen der sozialen Lage von Bevölkerungsgruppen verbunden sind.