Assessing Relationship Quality in Mandated Community Treatment: Blending Care With Control

Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-7083, USA.
Psychological Assessment (Impact Factor: 2.99). 01/2008; 19(4):397-410. DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.397
Source: PubMed


Traditional measures of the therapeutic alliance do not capture the dual roles inherent in relationships with involuntary clients. Providers not only care for, but also have control over, involuntary clients. In 2 studies of probationers mandated to psychiatric treatment (n=90; n=322), the authors developed and validated the revised Dual-Role Relationships Inventory (DRI-R). The authors found that (a) relationship quality in mandated treatment involves caring and fairness, trust, and an authoritative (not authoritarian) style, (b) the DRI-R assesses these domains of relationship quality, is internally consistent, and relates in a theoretically coherent pattern with ratings of within-session behavior and with measures of the therapeutic alliance, relationship satisfaction, symptoms, and treatment motivation, and (c) the quality of dual-role relationships predicts future compliance with the rules, as assessed by probation violations and revocation. The DRI-R covaries with multiple domains more strongly than a leading measure of the therapeutic alliance, suggesting that it better captures the nature and effect of relationship quality in mandated treatment.

Download full-text


Available from: Devon L L Polaschek,
    • "caring relationship with offenders, the more likely it is that the offender will avoid recidivism (Kennealy at el., 2012; Skeem et al., 2007). To the extent to which officers respond more harshly to offenders with mental disorder either out of frustration (see Skeem, Encandela, & Eno Louden, 2003), these offenders may be disproportionately more likely to return to custody. "

    The Sequential Intercept Model and criminal justice: Promoting community alternatives for individuals with serious mental illness, 01/2015;
  • Source
    • "These placements may exacerbate a traumatic or stress response because of the stress related to prolonged confinement (Ford et al., 2007). Thus, approaches to enforcement based on problem solving, incentivizing behavior, counseling , and persuasion may be more helpful for these youths than confrontation and negative pressure (Skeem, Louden, Polaschek, & Camp, 2007; Vidal & Skeem, 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examines how probation officers' (POs) knowledge of juveniles' trauma influences probation practices. The study was conducted with POs who responded to a Web-based survey (n = 308). The POs were directed to randomly select one juvenile from their caseload and to complete the Probation Practices Assessment Survey to assess their knowledge of the youth's lifetime trauma and past-year stressful life experience and their practice approaches. Nineteen percent of youths were reported as having had lifetime exposure to at least one type of trauma (for example, physical assault, sexual assault, witness violent death). The most common traumatic experience was sexual assault, with 11% of POs reporting this experience among the study youths. Structural equation modeling results indicated that POs' knowledge of cumulative exposure to trauma is associated with treatment-oriented probation and counseling approaches. Results of this study signal the importance of careful assessments of exposure to trauma and stressful life events among youths on probation. The use of specialized trauma-informed assessment strategies also are recommended to increase the sensitivity of juvenile justice programs to trauma.
    Social work research 07/2012; 36(1). DOI:10.1093/swr/svs007 · 0.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Data were collected by Skeem et al. (2007), who describe the basic study method in detail. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As the correctional population continues to increase, probation agencies struggle to adequately supervise offenders with unique needs, including those with mental disorder. Although more than 100 U.S. probation agencies have implemented specialty mental health case-loads, little is known about their practices. Based on detailed observations of 83 audio-taped meetings, we examined interactions between probationers and officers in a prototypic specialty agency, focusing on the extent to which practices comport with evidence-based risk reduction principles. We found that specialty officers (a) more frequently discussed probationers' general mental health than any individual criminogenic need, (b) chiefly questioned, directed, affirmed, and supported (rather than confronted) probationers, and (c) relied more heavily on neutral strategies and positive pressures (e.g., inducements) rather than negative pressures (e.g., threats of incarceration) to monitor and enforce compliance. Implications for "what works" to promote community integration for probationers with mental disorder are discussed.
    Law and Human Behavior 04/2012; 36(2):109-19. DOI:10.1037/h0093961 · 2.16 Impact Factor
Show more