Article

Chest wall kinematics and Hoover's sign.

Fondazione Don C. Gnocchi, IRCCS, Section of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Via Imprunetana, Pozzolatico, Firenze, Italy.
Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (Impact Factor: 2.05). 03/2008; 160(3):325-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2007.10.019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT No attempt has been made to quantify the observed rib cage distortion (Hoover's sign) in terms of volume displacement. We hypothesized that Hoover's sign and hyperinflation are independent quantities.
Twenty obstructed stable patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not they exhibited Hoover's sign during clinical examination while breathing quietly. We evaluated the volumes of chest wall and its compartments: the upper rib cage, the lower rib cage and the abdomen, using optoelectronic plethysmography.
The volumes of upper rib cage, lower rib cage and abdomen as a percentage of absolute volume of the chest wall were similar in patients with and without Hoover's sign. In contrast, the tidal volume of the chest wall, upper rib cage, lower rib cage, their ratio and abdomen quantified Hoover's sign, but did not correlate with level of hyperinflation.
Rib cage distortion and hyperinflation appear to define independently the functional condition of these patients.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
103 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Whether dyspnea, chest wall dynamic hyperinflation, and abnormalities of rib cage motion are interrelated phenomena has not been systematically evaluated in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Our hypothesis that they are not interrelated was based on the following observations: (i) externally imposed expiratory flow limitation is associated with no rib cage distortion during strenuous incremental exercise, with indexes of hyperinflation not being correlated with dyspnea, and (ii) end-expiratory chest wall volume may either increase or decrease during exercise in patients with COPD, with those who hyperinflate being as breathless as those who do not. Sixteen patients breathed either room air or 50% supplemental O2 at 75% of peak exercise in randomized order. We evaluated the volume of chest wall (V(cw)) and its compartments: the upper rib cage (V(rcp)), lower rib cage (V(rca)), and abdomen (V(ab)) using optoelectronic plethysmography; rib cage distortion was assessed by measuring the phase angle shift between V(rcp) and V(rca). Ten patients increased end-expiratory V(cw) (V(cw,ee)) on air. In seven hyperinflators and three non-hyperinflators, the lower rib cage paradoxed inward during inspiration with a phase angle of 63.4° ± 30.7° compared with a normal phase angle of 16.1° ± 2.3° recorded in patients without rib cage distortion. Dyspnea (by Borg scale) averaged 8.2 and 9 at the end of exercise on air in patients with and without rib cage distortion, respectively. At iso-time during exercise with oxygen, decreased dyspnea was associated with a decrease in ventilation regardless of whether patients distorted the rib cage, dynamically hyperinflated, or deflated the chest wall. Dyspnea, chest wall dynamic hyperinflation, and rib cage distortion are not interrelated phenomena.
    Medicine and science in sports and exercise 06/2012; 44(6):1049-56. · 4.48 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) is an innovative method of indirect measurement of pulmonary ventilation, capable of breath-by-breath, three-dimensional, real time assessment of absolute lung volumes and their variations in the three compartments of the chest wall (pulmonary rib cage, abdominal rib cage, and abdomen). OEP allows the measurement of variables of breathing pattern, breathing asynchrony, and contribution of each chest wall compartment and hemithorax to the tidal volume. OBJECTIVES: To review the literature on the following aspects related to OEP: history, operating principle, advantages, psychometric properties, variables, and method of system analysis, highlighting information about its handling. In a second part, the objective is to analyze the applicability of OEP in different health conditions/situations such as: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; acute effects of exercise, pulmonary rehabilitation, breathing exercise, and lung transplantation), asthma, patients in intensive care, neuromuscular diseases, and stroke. METHOD: A search was performed in MedLine, SciELO and Lilacs with the term "optoelectronic plethysmography". Forty-three papers were included. CONCLUSION: Based on the literature reviewed, OEP has been shown to be an assessment tool that can provide information about ventilatory parameters in healthy subjects and subjects with various dysfunctions in different positions, situations, and settings. The main results of studies on OEP in COPD are shown, representing the largest body of knowledge to date. The results of studies on OEP in other health conditions are also shown.
    Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia 11/2012; · 1.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Factors determining the shape of the human rib cage are not completely understood. We aimed to quantify the contribution of anthropometric and COPD-related changes to rib cage variability in adult cigarette smokers. Rib cage diameters and areas (calculated from the inner surface of the rib cage) in 816 smokers with or without COPD, were evaluated at three anatomical levels using computed tomography (CT). CTs were analyzed with software, which allows quantification of total emphysema (emphysema%). The relationship between rib cage measurements and anthropometric factors, lung function indices, and %emphysema were tested using linear regression models. A model that included gender, age, BMI, emphysema%, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)%, and forced vital capacity (FVC)% fit best with the rib cage measurements (R(2) = 64% for the rib cage area variation at the lower anatomical level). Gender had the biggest impact on rib cage diameter and area (105.3 cm(2); 95% CI: 111.7 to 98.8 for male lower area). Emphysema% was responsible for an increase in size of upper and middle CT areas (up to 5.4 cm(2); 95% CI: 3.0 to 7.8 for an emphysema increase of 5%). Lower rib cage areas decreased as FVC% decreased (5.1 cm(2); 95% CI: 2.5 to 7.6 for 10 percentage points of FVC variation). This study demonstrates that simple CT measurements can predict rib cage morphometric variability and also highlight relationships between rib cage morphometry and emphysema.
    PLoS ONE 01/2013; 8(7):e68546. · 3.73 Impact Factor