Correction of Fragile X Syndrome in Mice
Gu ¨l Do ¨len,1,2Emily Osterweil,1B.S. Shankaranarayana Rao,3Gordon B. Smith,1Benjamin D. Auerbach,1
Sumantra Chattarji,4and Mark F. Bear1,*
1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
2Department of Neuroscience, Brown Medical School and the Division of Biology and Medicine, Providence, RI 02912, USA
3Department of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Bangalore 560 002, India
4National Center for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560 002, India
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common
form of heritable mental retardation and the
by transcriptional silencing of the FMR1 gene
that encodes the fragile X mental retardation
protein(FMRP), butthepathogenesis of thedis-
ease is unknown. According to one proposal,
many psychiatric and neurological symptoms
of FXS result from unchecked activation of
mGluR5, a metabotropic glutamate receptor.
To test this idea we generated Fmr1 mutant
mice with a 50% reduction in mGluR5 expres-
sion andstudied a range ofphenotypes withrel-
evance to the human disorder. Our results dem-
onstrate that mGluR5 contributes significantly
to the pathogenesis of the disease, a finding
that has significant therapeutic implications for
fragile X and related developmental disorders.
Despite progress understanding the etiology of fragile X, it
is still unknown how disruption of brain function by the
FMR1 mutation leads to a devastating syndrome that
includes altered neural development, cognitive impair-
ment, childhood epilepsy, and autism (Bernardet and Cru-
sio, 2006). There is no treatment for fragile X syndrome
(FXS), and the prospects for therapy by gene replacement
are not promising (Peier et al., 2000). Future therapeutic
approaches must therefore be based on a more complete
understanding of the basic pathogenesis of the disease.
FMRP is enriched postsynaptically in the brain, particu-
larly at synapses that use the major excitatory neurotrans-
mitter glutamate, so much attention has been focused on
synaptic dysfunction in FXS. Recently a ‘‘metabotropic
glutamate receptor (mGluR) theory’’ of fragile X pathogen-
of mRNA translation at synapses (Brown et al., 2001; Qin
et al., 2005); (2) synaptic protein synthesis is stimulated
potently by activation of group 1 (Gp1) mGluRs, compris-
ing mGluR1 and mGluR5 (Weiler and Greenough, 1993);
(3) many of the lasting consequences of activating Gp1
mGluRs depend on synaptic mRNA translation (Huber
et al., 2000; Karachot et al., 2001; Merlin et al., 1998; Ray-
mond et al., 2000; Vanderklish and Edelman, 2002; Zho
et al., 2002); and (4) in the absence of FMRP, several pro-
tein synthesis-dependent consequences of activating
mGluRs are exaggerated (Chuang et al., 2005; Hou et al.,
2006; Huber et al., 2002; Koekkoek et al., 2005). Together,
these findings have led to the idea that FMRP and Gp1
mGluRs normally work in functional opposition, and that
in the absence of FMRP, unchecked mGluR-dependent
protein synthesis leads to the pathogenesis of FXS (Fig-
ure S1 available online).
The appeal of the mGluR theory stems from its simplic-
ity and the potentially profound therapeutic implication—
that downregulating Gp1 mGluR signaling could correct
multiple symptoms of FXS. However, the theory remains
controversial. To date, the strongest evidence in favor of
the mGluR theory (McBride et al., 2005; Tucker et al.,
2006)has beenindirect, relyingondrugtreatments in non-
mammalian species with mGluR orthologs coupled to dif-
ferent signaling cascades than mammalian Gp1 mGluRs
(Bjarnadottir et al., 2005). It has been shown in fragile X
knockout mice that acute administration of MPEP
nist, can reversibly suppress seizure phenotypes (Chuang
et al., 2005; Yan et al., 2005). However, in addition to off-
target activity of MPEP (Heidbreder et al., 2003; Lea and
Faden, 2006), interpretation of this finding is complicated
as well.Thus, itremains to be establishedif chronic down-
regulation of Gp1 mGluR signaling can correct altered
development in fragile X, as predicted by the mGluR
theory. In the current study, we used a genetic strategy
to definitively address this critical question.
Rescue Strategy and Rationale
Because both the human FMR1 and GRM5 genes have
functional homologs in the mouse (Fmr1 and Grm5), we
were able to generate Fmr1 knockout mice with reduced
Neuron 56, 955–962, December 20, 2007 ª2007 Elsevier Inc. 955
expression of mGluR5, the major Gp1 mGluR in the fore-
ship between two protein products can be examined;
genetic ‘‘rescue’’ occurs when single mutant phenotypes
are attenuated in the double mutant. The power of this
approach in the murine model is two-fold: (1) it is a precise
permits analysis of diverse phenotypes across many de-
velopmental time points, using a variety of experimental
fied in this mammalian model not only can serve to estab-
lishgeneticinteraction, butalsomaybear directrelation to
the phenotype in humans with the disease.
1997) to produce Fmr1 knockout animals with a selective
reduction in mGluR5 expression (Figure S2). To increase
the therapeutic relevance, we concentrated on animals
with a 50% reduction in mGluR5 rather than a complete
knockout (which impairs brain function [Jia et al., 1998;
Lu et al., 1997]). Littermates with four different genotypes
were created in our cross: wild-type [Fmr1 (+/Y) Grm5
(+/+)], Fmr1 knockout [Fmr1 (?/Y) Grm5 (+/+)], Grm5 het-
erozygote [Fmr1 (+/Y) Grm5 (+/?)], and the knockout/het-
erozygote cross [Fmr1 (?/Y) Grm5 (+/?)]; these animals
are termed WT, KO, HT, and CR, respectively. In all cross-
ings, animals were on the C57Bl/6J clonal background.
The key question that we address in this study is if a
X mutant phenotypes, as predicted by the mGluR theory
(Figure S1). Our genetic rescue strategy rests on the as-
sumption that the FMRP-regulated ‘‘readout’’ of mGluR5
activation is modulated by Grm5 gene dosage. One
FMRP-regulated consequence of mGluR5 activation is
hippocampal long-term synaptic depression (LTD), which
is approximately doubled in the KO (Huber et al., 2002). It
had already been established that there is a significant
effect of mGluR5 expression level on LTD in the C57Bl/
6J WT background (Huber et al., 2001), and we confirmed
in the present study that a 50% reduction in mGluR5 pro-
tein expression also significantly reduces LTD in the Fmr1
KO background (Figure S2). We therefore went on to
examine diverse phenotypes with relevance to the human
disorder, including experience-dependent cortical devel-
body growth, seizure, and postpubertal macroorchidism.
All analyses of these mice were performed ‘‘blind,’’ with-
out experimenter knowledge of the genotype. Note that,
in each experiment, threeoutcomes werepossible: the re-
duced Grm5 gene dosage could ameliorate, exacerbate,
or have no effect on Fmr1 mutant phenotypes.
Altered Ocular Dominance Plasticity in Fmr1 KO
Mice Is Rescued by Reducing mGluR5 Expression
ple of how experience modifies the brain during critical pe-
riods of development. Here, we use this paradigm to study
Visually evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded in the
visual cortex of awake mice (Figure 1A), as described pre-
viously (Frenkel and Bear, 2004). We initially assessed
absolute levels of visual responsivenessacrossgenotypes
Additional mice were studied before and after MD begun
on P28. Previous studies using the chronic VEP method
have shown how visual responses evolve during the
course of MD (Figure S3). Closure of the contralateral eye-
lid initially causes depression of responses to the deprived
(contralateral)-eye (apparent at 3 days MD), followed by
potentiation of nondeprived (ipsilateral)-eye responses
(apparent by 7 days MD) (Frenkel and Bear, 2004). Be-
cause they are recorded chronically, changes in VEPs for
each animal can be conveniently described by two values:
the fractional change from baseline in contralateral-eye
response, and the fractional change from baseline in the
ipsilateral-eye response. For reference, average effects
(±SEM) of 3 and 7 days of MD in WT mice from a previous
study (Frenkel and Bear, 2004) appear in Figure S3.
In the current study we also found that the response to
3 days MD in WT mice was dominated by deprived-eye
depression, as expected. In KO littermates, however, the
response to brief MD was characterized by substantial
open-eye potentiation, reminiscent of what happens in
WT mice after longer periods of MD. On the other hand,
the HT mice showed a ‘‘hypoplastic’’ response to MD,
as they lacked significant deprived-eye depression. How-
ever, crossing the two mutant mice resulted in a pheno-
type very similar to WT that was again dominated by
deprived-eye depression (Figure 1C).
Plots of the average (±SEM) fractional changes after
3 days MD in the four genotypes are shown in Figure 1D.
The KO mice displayed increased plasticity compared to
the WT (MANOVA WT:KO, p = 0.011); HT mice displayed
diminished plasticity compared to WT (MANOVA WT:HT,
and were not significantly different from WT (MANOVA
WT:CR, p = 0.8268, KO:CR p = 0.037, HT:CRS p = 0.161).
Since the KO and HT mutations affected OD plasticity in
opposite directions, one could question whether the CR
phenotype reflects rescue or the simple addition of two
independent effects. However, a compound phenotype
would be the absence of deprived-eye depression (the ef-
fect of reducing mGluR5) and an exaggeration of open-
eye potentiation (the effect of reducing FMRP). Instead,
we observe a phenotype in the CR mice that is signifi-
cantly different from KO mice, and not significantly differ-
ent from WT. Thus, reducing mGluR5 by 50% corrects the
defect in plasticity caused by the absence of FMRP.
Density of Dendritic Spines on Cortical Pyramidal
Neurons Is Increased in Fmr1 KO and Rescued by
Reducing mGluR5 Expression
Abnormalities in dendritic spines, the major targets of ex-
citatory synapses in the brain, have long been associated
956 Neuron 56, 955–962, December 20, 2007 ª2007 Elsevier Inc.
Correction of Fragile X Syndrome in Mice
with various forms of human mental retardation, including
FXS. The increased spine density phenotype observed in
humans has been recapitulated in the Fmr1 KO mouse
synthesis-dependent consequence of activating Gp1
mGluRs on cortical neurons in vitro is an increase in the
density of long, thin spines (Vanderklish and Edelman,
2002), we hypothesized that FMRP and mGluR5 antago-
nistically regulate dendritic spine density in vivo.
We chose to examine this question in layer 3 pyramidal
neurons of binocular visual cortex at P30, since we had
established that OD plasticity at this age was altered in
the Fmr1 KO mice. Dendritic spine density was analyzed
separately in apical and basal branches across the four
genotypes, using the Golgi-Cox silver staining method
(Figure 2A). We observed a highly significant increase in
total dendritic spine density in the KO, readily apparent
asarightward shiftinthe cumulativeprobability histogram
(Figure 2B). Reducing mGluR5 expression had no effect
on spine density in the HT mice, but the fragile X pheno-
type was completely rescued in the CR mice (apical
Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.0001; Kolmogorov-Smirnov
test, WT:KO p < 0.0001, WT:HT p = 0.3920, CR:WT p =
0.4407, CR:KO p < 0.0001; basal Kruskal-Wallis test, p <
0.0001; Kolmogorov-Smirnov test WT:KO p < 0.0001,
WT:HT p >0.9999, CR:WT p >0.9999,CR:KO p< 0.0001).
We also performed a segmental analysis of spine den-
sity across the four genotypes. Consistent with previous
tion of synapses in both apical and basal branches across
all genotypes. However, as shown in Figure 2C, the den-
sity of spines was uniformly increased in the Fmr1 KO
and rescued in the CR (repeated-measures ANOVA:
apical distance p < 0.0001, apical distance 3 genotype
p < 0.0001, apical genotype p < 0.0001, basal distance
p < 0.0001, basal distance 3 genotype p = 0.0181, basal
genotype p < 0.0001; ANOVA genotype: apical, basal, 10–
100, in 10 mm segments p < 0.0001; unpaired Student’s t
tests apical, basal, 10–100, in 10 mm segments WT:KO p <
0.05, WT:HT p > 0.05, WT:CR p > 0.05, KO:CR p < 0.05).
nor the rescue by selective reduction in gene dosage in
the CR reflects a redistribution of synapses within the
Increased Basal Protein Synthesis
in Hippocampus of Fmr1 KO Mice Is
Rescued by Reducing mGluR5 Expression
A previous study reported an elevated basal rate of in vivo
protein synthesis in the hippocampus of Fmr1 KO mice
(Qin et al., 2005). We asked if this difference could also
be observed in hippocampal slices in vitro by examining
the incorporation of
protein. We observed a significant effect of genotype on
protein synthesis (Figure 3A). The increased protein syn-
thesis seen in KO hippocampus was prevented by selec-
tive reduction in mGluR5 gene dosage.
Electrophoretic separation of radiolabeled translation
products (Figure 3B) suggests that increased protein syn-
thesis in the KO is not limited to one or few predominant
protein species but rather extends across a broad range
35S-methionine/cysteine into new
Figure 1. Genetic Rescue of OD Plasticity Phenotype in FXS
(A) Schematic of the mouse visual pathway and position of the record-
ing electrode in primary visual cortex.
contrasts (0–100%, square reversing at 1 Hz, 0.05 cycles/degree).
No significant differences across genotypes (n = 46 WT, n = 33 KO,
n = 8 HT, n = 20 CR hemispheres, MANOVA p = 0.0868).
(C) Effect of 3 day MD on VEP amplitude (data expressed as
mean ± SEM, normalized to day 0 ipsilateral eye value. (C1) WT mice
(n = 19). Note significant deprived eye depression. (C2) KO mice
(n = 18). Note significant open eye potentiation. (C3) HT mice (n = 16).
Note absence of deprived eye depression. (C4) CR mice (n = 13).
different from baseline (day 0).
Neuron 56, 955–962, December 20, 2007 ª2007 Elsevier Inc. 957
Correction of Fragile X Syndrome in Mice
of resolved molecular weights. Because the rate of protein
synthesis was unaffected in the HT mice relative to WT,
the rescue in the CR mice is unambiguous and does not
simply reflect an offsetting decrease in synthesis of a
separate pool of proteins.
Inhibitory Avoidance Extinction Is Exaggerated in
Fmr1 KO Mice and Rescued by Reducing
Although humans with FXS show mental retardation in the
moderate to severe range, prior studies of cognitive per-
formance in Fmr1 KO mice on the C57Bl/6J clonal back-
ground have revealed only subtle deficits (Bernardet and
Crusio, 2006). Consistent with these observations, we
found that acquisition of one-trial inhibitory avoidance
(IA), a hippocampus-dependent memory, did not differ
from normal in the Fmr1 KO mice. However, we were
inspired to additionally investigate IA extinction (IAE) by
in the hippocampus (Power et al., 2006). We discovered
that IAE is exaggerated in the Fmr1 KO mouse and that
this phenotype is corrected by reducing expression of
Adult mice of all four genotypes were given IA training,
followed at 6 and 24 hr by IAE training (Figure 4A). For
each animal, we measured the latency to enter the dark
side of the box on the first trial (baseline), the latency
6hrlater (postacquisition) to assessIAmemory, andagain
at 24 and 48 hr (post-extinction 1 and 2, respectively) to
assess IAE. As shown in Figure 4B, animals of all four
genotypes showed both significant IA acquisition at 6 hr
and extinction by 48 hr. A global statistical test suggested
that the pattern of learning across time varied across ge-
notypes (repeated-measures ANOVA genotype 3 time
p = 0.0239). As shown in Figures 4C–4E, these differences
are likely due to extinction rather than acquisition of inhib-
itory avoidance. At 6 hr, there was no difference across
genotypes in latency to enter (6 hr ANOVA p = 0.1525);
however, at 24 hr KO mice showed significantly shorter
latencies, suggesting exaggerated extinction in the ab-
sence of FMRP. This phenotype was rescued by selec-
tive reduction in mGluR5 gene dosage in the CR mice
(24 hr ANOVA p = 0.0013; Student’s t tests: WT:KO
Figure 2. Genetic Rescue of Dendritic Spine Phenotype in
ments of layer 3 pyramidal neurons in the binocular region of primary
visual cortex of all four genotypes collected at P30.
(B) Cumulative percent spines per mm in each dendritic segment; api-
cal branches, B1; basal branches, B2(n = 80 WT, 80 KO, 60 HT, 80 CR
apical and basal branches, respectively). (C) Segmental analysis of
spine density; number of spines per 10 mm bin, given as distance
from the origin of the branch, for apical (C1) and basal (C2) segments
across four genotypes.
Figure 3. Genetic Rescue of Protein Synthesis Phenotype in
(A) Significant differences in the levels of protein synthesis exist across
genotypes in the ventral hippocampus (n = 10 samples, 5 animals per
genotype). KO mice showed increased protein synthesis (mean ±
SEM: WT 389 ± 33.77 cpm/mg; KO 476 ± 29.98 cpm/mg; post hoc
paired Student’s t test WT:KO p = 0.004). Protein synthesis levels in
the HT mice were no different than WT (HT 409 ± 42.99 cpm/mg).
Increased protein synthesis seen in the KO were rescued in the CR
mice (CR 374 ± 50.81 cpm/mg). Post hoc paired Student’s t tests:
*significantly different from WT,ysignificantly different from KO.
(B) Representative autoradiogram shows that synthesis of many
protein species is elevated in the KO compared to all other genotypes.
958 Neuron 56, 955–962, December 20, 2007 ª2007 Elsevier Inc.
Correction of Fragile X Syndrome in Mice
p < 0.0001,WT:HT p = 0.8251, WT:CR p = 0.1156, KO:CR
p = 0.0132).
Because the primary aim of this study is to examine
genetic interaction between Fmr1 and Grm5, we also per-
formed a multivariate analysis that takes into consider-
ation both acquisition and extinction as they vary across
genotypes. As shown in Figure 4F, KO animals showed
significant difference in 24 hr latency (memory retention)
as it varied with 6 hr latency (memory acquisition), and
this difference was rescued by the selective reduction in
mGluR5 gene dosage in the CR mice (MANOVA for geno-
0.0785, KO:CR p = 0.0490, WT:CR p = 0.1863). The differ-
ence in retention across all genotypes was not significant
by 48 hr. Regardless of whether this KO phenotype
reflects exaggerated extinction or diminished stability of
the formed memory, there clearly is a significant genetic
interaction between Fmr1 and Grm5: the Fmr1 KO pheno-
type is rescued by the selective reduction in mGluR5
Audiogenic Seizures and Accelerated Body
Growth in Fmr1 KO Mice Are Rescued
by Reducing mGluR5 Expression
Consistent with neurological findings in fragile X patients,
previous studies have shown increased seizure suscepti-
bility in the Fmr1 KO mouse, using both in vitro and in vivo
epilepsy models (Bernardet and Crusio, 2006). We em-
ployed the audiogenic seizure (AGS) paradigm, which
shows a robust phenotype in Fmr1 KO mice and exhibits
developmental changes consistent with epilepsy in
human FXS (Yan et al., 2005). Because C57Bl/6 WT
mice are normally seizure resistant (Robertson, 1980), sei-
zures in the KO mice are a specific consequence of the
ences inAGS susceptibility were observed acrossthe four
genotypes examined. WT and HT mice showed zero inci-
dences of AGS, as expected, whereas 72% of the KO
mice had a seizure in response to the tone (Mann-Whitney
nificantly attenuated in the CR mice (Mann-Whitney U test
CR:KO p = 0.028). Thus, chronic reduction of mGluR5
gene dosage in KO mice produced a substantial rescue
of the seizure phenotype that is caused specifically by
the lack of FMRP.
Children with FXS show accelerated prepubescent
growth (Loesch et al., 1995). We discovered that this phe-
notype is recapitulated in the KO mouse and is rescued by
reducing mGluR5 gene dosage (Figure S4). At weaning
(P20–21), animals from all four genotypes had similar
body weights, but by P26 KO mice showed a slight
(10%) but significant increase in body weight as com-
pared to WT animals at the same age. This difference
was not observed in either the HT or CR mice (ANOVA
p = 0.048, post hoc Student’s t tests WT:KO p = 0.017,
KO:CR p = 0.004, CR:WT p = 0.818). The WT:KO body
weight difference was maximal at P30 (?15%), when it
was again rescued bya reduction in mGluR5gene dosage
in the CR mice (ANOVA p = 0.005, post hoc Student’s
t tests WT:KO p = 0.020, KO:CR p = 0.001, CR:WT
p = 0.555). As in humans, the KO growth increase in
mice was no longer apparent after adolescence (P45).
Figure 4. Genetic Rescue of Behavioral
Learning and Memory Phenotype in FXS
(A) Experimental design. Animals of all four
genotypes (n = 15 WT, n = 15 KO, n = 20 HT,
n = 17 CR) were given IA training at time 0,
and thelatency toenterthedarksidewasmea-
ing was followed by another round of IAE train-
ing, and latency was measured again at 48 hr.
(B)Animalsinallfour genotypes showedsignif-
icant acquisition and extinction. Post hoc Stu-
dent’s t tests: *significantly different from time
0 hr,ysignificantly different from time 6 hr.
(C) Raw data for acquisition of IA in the four
genotypes. Each line represents the change
in latency to enter the dark side for one mouse
(data from some mice superimpose).
(D) Raw data for extinction 1 in the four geno-
(E) Comparison of latency (mean ± SEM)
across genotypes for 6 hr time point (postac-
quisition) and 24 hr time point (post-extinction
1). Post hoc Student’s t tests: *significantly dif-
(F) Multivariate analysis of extinction as a func-
tion of acquisition at 24 hr time point (post-
extinction 1) and 48 hr time point. Plotted are
mean latencies ± SEM.
Neuron 56, 955–962, December 20, 2007 ª2007 Elsevier Inc. 959
Correction of Fragile X Syndrome in Mice
Macroorchidism in Fmr1 KO Mice Is Not Rescued
by Reducing mGluR5 Expression
Children with FXS (and KO mice) have dysmorphic fea-
tures, including postadolescent macroorchidism. Testes
express Gp1 mGluRs (Storto et al., 2001), so we won-
dered if this phenotype might also be rescued in our CR
mice. Postadolescent testicular weight was increased by
24% in KO mice compared to WT (p < 0.0004; Student’s
t test); however, there was no rescue of this phenotype
in the CR mice (Figure S5). To investigate if the absence
of rescue was a matter of gene dosage, we generated
KO mice that had a complete absence of mGluR5 [Fmr1
(?/Y) Grm5 (?/?), dKO]. Again, however, there was no
rescue of the testicular phenotype.
The goal of this study was to test a key prediction of the
mGluR theory—that aspects of FXS can be corrected by
downregulating signaling through group 1 mGluRs (Bear
et al., 2004). Each analysis was designed to examine a dif-
ferent dimension of the disorder in mice with relevance to
the human syndrome, ranging from the cognitive to the
somatic. The experiments assayed dysfunction in very
different neural circuits; and for each, three outcomes
were possible: amelioration, exacerbation, or persistence
of Fmr1 mutant phenotypes in mice with reduced expres-
sion of mGluR5. Thus, it is remarkable that by reducing
mGluR5 gene dosage by 50%, we were able to bring mul-
tiple, widely varied fragile X phenotypes significantly
closer to normal.
A novel aspect of the current study was the use of OD
synaptic modification is altered by the loss of FMRP. MD
sets in motion a sequence of synaptic changes in visual
cortex, characterized by a rapid and persistent loss of re-
tory increase in responsiveness to the nondeprived eye
(Frenkel and Bear, 2004). Because MD triggers mecha-
nisms of synaptic depression and potentiation, as well as
homeostatic adaptations to an altered environment, OD
plasticity is a particularly rich paradigm for understanding
the interactions of genes and experience. The intersecting
trends of using mice to study OD plasticity mechanisms
and to model human diseases provided the opportunity
to use this paradigm to get a more precise understanding
of how development goes awry in a genetic disorder.
Previous work suggested that Gp1 mGluR signaling is
highest in visual cortex during the period of maximal syn-
aptic plasticity (Dudek and Bear, 1989), and the current
findings strongly suggest an important role for mGluR5
in OD plasticity. Although more experiments will be re-
quired to pinpoint this role, an obvious clue comes from
the genetic interaction with Fmr1. FMRP can act as
a translational suppressor (Brown et al., 2001; Qin et al.,
2005), and OD plasticity, like many forms of persistent
synaptic modification, requires protein synthesis (Taha
and Stryker, 2002). Thus, our findings suggest the intrigu-
ing hypothesis that the rate of plasticity in visual cortex is
determined by the level of activity-dependent protein syn-
thesis, which is stimulated by mGluR5 and inhibited by
FMRP. Consistent with this model, the phenotype in
Fmr1 KO mice appears to reflect ‘‘hyperplasticity,’’ since
7 days. This exaggerated plasticity was corrected by re-
ducing mGluR5 expression by 50%.
Although we observed an increased spine density in the
in the amplitude of VEPs at P30. This discrepancy may be
measurements were made on layer 3 neurons. In any
case, the clear mutant spine phenotype in layer 3 gave
us the opportunity to examine if this structural defect
could also be corrected by decreasing mGluR5. We ob-
served a remarkable rescue of the fragile X spine pheno-
type in the CR mice, despite the fact that reducing
mGluR5 expression in the HT mice had no effect on spine
density. Thus, although the reduction in Grm5 gene dos-
age is not sufficient to alter spine density by itself, it com-
pletely corrects the defect in fragile X mice.
Strain-specific variation has confounded previous at-
tempts to identify a behavioral learning and memory
phenotype in the Fmr1 KO (Bernardet and Crusio, 2006).
Consistent with earlier findings, we were unable to detect
asignificant IAdeficit intheFmr1KOmiceon theC57BL/6
background. On the other hand, we were able to detect
a difference in the rate of IA extinction that could be cor-
rected by reducing mGluR5 expression. Because IA in-
duces LTP of Schaffer collateral synapses in area CA1 of
the hippocampus (Whitlock et al., 2006), it is tempting to
speculate that IA extinction is exaggerated in Fmr1 KO
mice due, at least in part, to excessive mGluR-dependent
synaptic weakening (Huber et al., 2002; Zho et al., 2002).
Unbalanced LTD could account for the cognitive impair-
ment that is the hallmark of fragile X.
Fragile X is a syndromic disorder. In addition to mental
retardation, associated features of the disease in humans
include childhood epilepsy, altered body growth, and
postpubertal macroorchidism. In the case of epilepsy
and macroorchidism, these phenotypes have been reca-
pitulated in the mouse model (Bernardet and Crusio,
2006); however, it was previously unknown that Fmr1
KO mice show a similar disruption in body growth. Both
the body growth and AGS phenotypes were ameliorated
in the CR mice; however, there was no evidence of an in-
ticle size. These results argue against a role for mGluR5 in
the pathogenesis of the macroorchidism phenotype in
FXS, but we cannot rule out a contribution of the other
Gp1 mGluR (mGluR1).
Although we studied a range of phenotypes, a simple way
to conceptualize the constellation of findings is that fragile
mental change, synaptic connectivity, protein synthesis,
960 Neuron 56, 955–962, December 20, 2007 ª2007 Elsevier Inc.
Correction of Fragile X Syndrome in Mice
memory extinction, body growth, and excitability—and
these excesses can be corrected by reducing mGluR5.
Although the precise molecular basis of the interaction
remains to be determined, the data show unambiguously
that mGluR5 and FMRP act as an opponent pair in several
functional contexts and support the theory thatmanyCNS
symptoms in fragile X are accounted for by unbalanced
apeutic implications for FXS and autism (see Bear et al.,
Fmr1 mutant mice (Jackson Labs) were crossed with Grm5 mutants
(Jackson Labs) to produce mice of four genotypes. In all crossings,
variability due to rearing conditions, all experimental animals were
to solitary housing were excluded), and maintained in a 12:12 hr light:
dark cycle. Paternal genotype varied between crossings and included
WT, Grm5 HT, or Grm5 KO.
See Figure S2 and the Supplemental Data.
Electrophysiology and Spine Measurements
Transverse hippocampal slices were prepared from P25–30 mice and
mGluR-LTD was studied as described by Huber et al. (2001). VEP
recordings and monocular deprivation were performed as previously
described (Frenkel and Bear, 2004). Spines were analyzed using the
Golgi-Cox method as described by Hayashi et al. (2004). Animal n =
8 WT, 8 KO, 6 HT, 8 CR; dendritic segment n = 80 WT, 80 KO,
60 HT, 80 CR apical and basal branches, respectively. All protrusions,
irrespective of their morphological characteristics, were counted as
spines if they were in direct continuity with the dendritic shaft. In total,
68,032 spines were counted across all four genotypes.
Inhibitory Avoidance Extinction, Metabolic Labeling, and
2006). Metabolic labeling experiments were similar to those described
in Raymond et al. (2000). AGS experiments were performed as
described by Yan et al. (2005). See Supplemental Data.
In all cases, post hoc comparisons between genotypes were made
only if global analysis indicated a statistically significant (p < 0.05)
effect of genotype. Outliers (R2 SD from the mean) were excluded.
For AGS experiments, nonparametric statistics (Kruskall-Wallis,
Mann-Whitney U) were used since incidence scores were bimodal
(yes/no). For all other analysis, parametric tests (ANOVA, MANOVA,
two-tailed paired and unpaired Student’s t tests, assuming equal var-
iance) wereused.Forthemetaboliclabelingexperiments, theposthoc
paired Student’s t test was used to eliminate the variability due to
strength of radioactive label on different experimental days and was
justified by the experimental design (samples were collected with
yoked, rather than randomized, controls).
The Supplemental Data for this article can be found online at http://
We are grateful to M. Shuler for helpful discussion of appropriate
statistical analysis; K. Oram, C. Dudley, A. Topolszki, T. Udaka, and
C. Poo for genotyping and animal care; E. Sklar for technical assis-
tance and construction of AGS stimulus; M. Frenkel for use of previ-
ously published data; S. Meagher for administrative support; A. Kraev
and J. Roder for Grm5 genotyping protocols; K. Huber, K. Wiig, A. Go-
vindarajan, R. Paylor, W. Chen, B. Yoon, Q. Yan, R. Bauchwitz, M.
Tranfaglia, E. Klann, E. Berry-Kravis, and A. Heynen for helpful discus-
sions. Supported by the NIMH, NICHD, National Fragile X Foundation,
FRAXA, Simons Foundation. M.F.B. discloses a financial interest in
Received: March 29, 2007
Revised: October 8, 2007
Accepted: December 3, 2007
Published: December 19, 2007
Bear, M.F., Huber, K.M., and Warren, S.T. (2004). The mGluR theory of
fragile X mental retardation. Trends Neurosci. 27, 370–377.
Bear, M.F., Dolen, G., Osterweil, E., and Nagarajan, N. (2008). Fragile
X: Translation in action. Neuropsychopharmacology 33, 84–87.
Bernardet, M., and Crusio, W.E. (2006). Fmr1 KO mice as a possible
model of autistic features. ScientificWorldJournal 6, 1164–1176.
Bjarnadottir, T.K., Schioth, H.B., and Fredriksson, R. (2005). The
phylogenetic relationship of the glutamate and pheromone G-pro-
tein-coupled receptors in different vertebrate species. Ann. N Y
Acad. Sci. 1040, 230–233.
Brown, V., Jin, P., Ceman, S., Darnell, J.C., O’Donnell, W.T.,
Tenenbaum, S.A., Jin, X., Feng, Y., Wilkinson, K.D., Keene, J.D.,
et al. (2001). Microarray identification of FMRP-associated brain
mRNAs and altered mRNA translational profiles in fragile X syndrome.
Cell 107, 477–487.
Chuang, S.C., Zhao, W., Bauchwitz, R., Yan, Q., Bianchi, R., and
Wong, R.K. (2005). Prolonged epileptiform discharges induced by al-
tered group I metabotropic glutamate receptor-mediated synaptic re-
Dudek, S.M., and Bear, M.F. (1989). A biochemical correlate of the
critical period for synaptic modification in the visual cortex. Science
The Dutch-Belgian Fragile X Consortium. (1994). Fmr1 knockout mice:
A model to study fragile X mental retardation. Cell 78, 23–33.
ocular dominance in visual cortex of young mice. Neuron 44, 917–923.
Grossman, A.W., Aldridge, G.M., Weiler, I.J., and Greenough, W.T.
(2006). Local protein synthesis and spine morphogenesis: Fragile X
syndrome and beyond. J. Neurosci. 26, 7151–7155.
Hayashi, M.L., Choi, S.Y., Rao, B.S., Jung, H.Y., Lee, H.K., Zhang, D.,
Chattarji, S., Kirkwood, A., and Tonegawa, S. (2004). Altered cortical
forebrain-specific dominant-negative PAK transgenic mice. Neuron
memory consolidation in
Heidbreder, C.A., Bianchi, M., Lacroix, L.P., Faedo, S., Perdona, E.,
Remelli, R., Cavanni, P., and Crespi, F. (2003). Evidence that the
metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 antagonist MPEP may act as an in-
hibitor of the norepinephrine transporter in vitro and in vivo. Synapse
Hou, L., Antion, M.D., Hu, D., Spencer, C.M., Paylor, R., and Klann, E.
(2006). Dynamic translational and proteasomal regulation of fragile X
Neuron 56, 955–962, December 20, 2007 ª2007 Elsevier Inc. 961
Correction of Fragile X Syndrome in Mice
mental retardation protein controls mGluR-dependent long-term
depression. Neuron 51, 441–454.
Huber, K.M., Kayser, M.S., and Bear, M.F. (2000). Role for rapid
dendritic protein synthesis in hippocampal mGluR-dependent long-
term depression. Science 288, 1254–1257.
Huber, K.M., Roder, J.C., and Bear, M.F. (2001). Chemical induction of
mGluR5- and protein synthesis-dependent long-term depression in
hippocampal area CA1. J. Neurophysiol. 86, 321–325.
Huber, K.M., Gallagher, S.M., Warren, S.T., and Bear, M.F. (2002).
Altered synaptic plasticity in a mouse model of fragile X mental retar-
dation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7746–7750.
Jia, Z., Lu, Y., Henderson, J., Taverna, F., Romano, C., Abramow-
Newerly, W., Wojtowicz, J.M., and Roder, J. (1998). Selective abolition
of the NMDA component of long-term potentiation in mice lacking
mGluR5. Learn. Mem. 5, 331–343.
Karachot, L., Shirai, Y., Vigot, R., Yamamori, T., and Ito, M. (2001).
Induction of long-term depression in cerebellar Purkinje cells requires
a rapidly turned over protein. J. Neurophysiol. 86, 280–289.
Koekkoek, S.K., Yamaguchi, K., Milojkovic, B.A., Dortland, B.R.,
Ruigrok, T.J., Maex, R., De Graaf, W., Smit, A.E., VanderWerf, F.,
Bakker, C.E., et al. (2005). Deletion of FMR1 in Purkinje cells enhances
parallel fiber LTD, enlarges spines, and attenuates cerebellar eyelid
conditioning in Fragile X syndrome. Neuron 47, 339–352.
Lea, P.M., IV, and Faden, A.I. (2006). Metabotropic glutamate receptor
subtype 5 antagonists MPEP and MTEP. CNS Drug Rev. 12, 149–166.
Loesch, D.Z., Huggins, R.M., and Hoang, N.H. (1995). Growth in stat-
ure in fragile X families: A mixed longitudinal study. Am. J. Med. Genet.
Lu, Y.M., Jia, Z., Janus, C., Henderson, J.T., Gerlai, R., Wojtowicz,
J.M., and Roder, J.C. (1997). Mice lacking metabotropic glutamate
receptor 5 show impaired learning and reduced CA1 long-term poten-
tiation (LTP) but normal CA3 LTP. J. Neurosci. 17, 5196–5205.
McBride, S.M., Choi, C.H., Wang, Y., Liebelt, D., Braunstein, E.,
Ferreiro, D., Sehgal, A., Siwicki, K.K., Dockendorff, T.C., Nguyen,
H.T., etal.(2005).Pharmacologicalrescue ofsynaptic plasticity,court-
ship behavior, and mushroom body defects in a Drosophila model of
fragile X syndrome. Neuron 45, 753–764.
Merlin,L.R.,Bergold, P.J.,andWong,R.K.(1998).Requirement ofpro-
tein synthesis for group I mGluR-mediated induction of epileptiform
discharges. J. Neurophysiol. 80, 989–993.
Peier, A.M., McIlwain, K.L., Kenneson, A.,Warren, S.T., Paylor, R.,and
Nelson, D.L. (2000). (Over)correction of FMR1 deficiency with YAC
transgenics: Behavioral and physical features. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9,
Power, A.E., Berlau, D.J., McGaugh, J.L., and Steward, O. (2006). Ani-
somycin infused into the hippocampus fails to block ‘‘reconsolidation’’
but impairs extinction: The role of re-exposure duration. Learn. Mem.
Qin, M., Kang, J., Burlin, T.V., Jiang, C., and Smith, C.B. (2005). Post-
adolescent changes in regional cerebral protein synthesis: An in vivo
study in the FMR1 null mouse. J. Neurosci. 25, 5087–5095.
Raymond, C.R., Thompson, V.L., Tate, W.P., and Abraham, W.C.
(2000). Metabotropic glutamate receptors trigger homosynaptic
protein synthesis to prolong long-term potentiation. J. Neurosci. 20,
receptor binding in a susceptible strain of mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 66,
Storto, M., Sallese, M., Salvatore, L., Poulet, R., Condorelli, D.F.,
Dell’Albani, P., Marcello, M.F., Romeo, R., Piomboni, P., Barone, N.,
et al. (2001). Expression of metabotropic glutamate receptors in the
rat and human testis. J. Endocrinol. 170, 71–78.
Taha, S., and Stryker, M.P. (2002). Rapid ocular dominance plasticity
requires cortical but not geniculate protein synthesis. Neuron 34,
Tucker, B., Richards, R.I., and Lardelli, M. (2006). Contribution of
mGluR and Fmr1 functional pathways to neurite morphogenesis, cra-
niofacial development and fragile X syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 15,
Vanderklish, P.W., and Edelman, G.M. (2002). Dendritic spines elon-
gate after stimulation of group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors
in cultured hippocampal neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99,
Weiler, I.J., and Greenough, W.T. (1993). Metabotropic glutamate re-
ceptors trigger postsynaptic protein synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 90, 7168–7171.
Whitlock, J.R., Heynen, A.J., Shuler, M.G., and Bear, M.F. (2006).
Learning induces long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Science
Yan, Q.J., Rammal, M., Tranfaglia, M., and Bauchwitz, R.P. (2005).
Suppression of two major Fragile X Syndrome mouse model pheno-
types by the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP. Neuropharmacology 49,
Zho, W.M., You, J.L., Huang, C.C., and Hsu, K.S. (2002). The group I
metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist (S)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylgly-
cine induces a novel form of depotentiation in the CA1 region of the
hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 22, 8838–8849.
962 Neuron 56, 955–962, December 20, 2007 ª2007 Elsevier Inc.
Correction of Fragile X Syndrome in Mice