Journal of Medical Virology 80:254–260 (2008)
Clinical Evaluation of the COBAS
HCV RNA Quantitation in Comparison
With the Branched-DNA Assay
Fabrizia Pittaluga,1Tiziano Allice,1Maria Lorena Abate,2,3Alessia Ciancio,2,3Francesco Cerutti,1
Silvia Varetto,1Giuseppe Colucci,4Antonina Smedile,2,3and Valeria Ghisetti1*
1Laboratory of Microbiology, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
2Gastro-Hepatology Department, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
3Department of Internal Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
4Scientific Affairs, Roche Molecular Systems, Rotkreuz, Switzerland
Diagnosis and monitoring of HCV infection relies
on sensitive and accurate HCV RNA detection
AmpliPrepTM/COBAS TaqManTM48 (CAP/CTM)
(Roche, Branchburg, NJ), a fully automated, real-
time PCR HCV RNA quantitative test was
assessed and compared with the branched-
DNA (bDNA) assay. Clinical evaluation on 576
specimens obtained from patients with chronic
hepatitis C showed a good correlation (r¼0.893)
between the two test, but the CAP/CTM scored
higher HCV RNA titers than the bDNA across
all viral genotypes. The mean bDNA versus CAP/
CTM log10IU/ml differences were ?0.49, ?0.4,
?0.54, ?0.26 for genotype 1a, 1b, 2a/2c, 3a, and
4, respectively. These differences reached sta-
tistical significance for genotypes 1b, 2a/c, and
3a. The ability of the CAP/CTM to monitor
patients undergoing antiviral therapy and cor-
rectly identify the weeks 4 and 12 rapid and
The broader dynamic range of the CAP/CTM
compared with the bDNA allowed for a better
to monitor HCV viremia during treatment of
and wide dynamic range may help a better
definition of viral load changes during antiviral
therapy. J. Med. Virol. 80:254–260, 2008.
? 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
HCV RNA quantitation; real-
time PCR; automated system;
early and rapid virologic res-
ponse; antiviral therapy
HCV viral load plays a major role in the management
of chronic hepatitis C for stratifying and monitor-
ing patient response to antiviral therapy. HCV RNA
combination therapy predict the sustained virological
response through the definition of end points for anti-
viral treatment [Mangia et al., 2005; Lukasiewicz et al.,
2007]. The study of viral kinetic with mathematical
models during the first 3 months of therapy has led to
the development of algorithms for an early prediction of
the virological response in order to avoid unnecessary
therapy in patients with little chance of sustained
virological response [Zeuzem et al., 2001; Perelson
et al., 2005]. The rate of sustained virological response
Zeuzem et al., 2001; Mangia et al., 2005; Perelson
decrease from baseline at week 12 (early virological
response) has a high predictive value for a virological
nonresponse (>98%) in genotype 1, 4, and 6 infected
patients [Manns et al., 2001; Zeuzem et al., 2001, 2006;
None to declareAuthors are gratefulto Roche Diagnostics, Italy
for the kind support of kits and technical assistance with the
*Correspondence to: Valeria Ghisetti, MD, Laboratory of
Microbiology, Molinette Hospital, Corso Bramante 88/90, 10126
Torino, Italy. E-mail: email@example.com
Accepted 9 October 2007
Published online in Wiley InterScience
? 2007 WILEY-LISS, INC.
probability of sustained virological response who may
benefit from shorter treatment schedules [Zeuzem et al.,
et al., 2006; Lukasiewicz et al., 2007].
Both signal amplification and gene amplification
techniques, based on the branched DNA (bDNA)
and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology,
respectively, can be used to quantify and monitor
HCV viral load with different detection limit and
dynamic ranges. The more sensitive qualitative PCR
are used for detecting residual and low levels of HCV
RNA at the end of treatment and follow-up [Pawlotsky
et al., 2000; Strader et al., 2004; Gerotto et al., 2006;
Herrmann et al., 2006; Zeuzem et al., 2006]. Real-time
PCR provides a high sensitivity and a broad dynamic
range being suitable for both a qualitative and quanti-
tative HCV RNA determination, thus simplifying
current laboratories workflow. However, the virus
genetic variability and the efficiency of nucleic acid
extraction may influence the performances of PCR-
based assays [Gardner et al., 2003].
The real-time PCR system COBAS TaqManTM
48 (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Branchburg, NJ)
et al., 2004; Germer et al., 2005; Konnick et al., 2005;
Caliendo et al., 2006; Gelderblom et al., 2006]. More
recently, the combination of the COBAS TaqManTM
the COBAS AmpliprepTM(CAP/CTM), has been intro-
routine series. This configuration has been adapted to
the CAP/CTM HCV test, an automated real-time PCR
assay based on a dual labeled hybridization probe
targeting the 50NC region of HCV.
In the present study, the performance of the CAP/
chronic hepatitis C in comparison with the bDNA
signal amplification assay. Correlation and differences
in RNA quantitation were studied according to HCV
characterized patients undergoing antiviral therapy
was used to assess the ability of the test to detect
patient responses at weeks 4 and 12 and the treatment
Plasma specimens from 400 patients with HCV-
related chronic disease, referred for routine HCV RNA
quantitation were stored at ?808C for up to 3 days
and then analyzed in parallel with the CAP/CTM
and the bDNA techniques. HCV genotyping was 1a in
42 patients, 1b in 197, 2a/2c in 81, 3a in 53, and 4 in 27.
Both the assays were also assessed using an
additional collection of plasma samples from 31 patients
with chronic hepatitis C treated with PEG-Interferon
(IFN)þ Ribavirin combination therapy. PEG-IFN alfa-
2b (PegIntron, Schering-Plough Corp., Kenilworth, NJ)
at a dosage of 1.5 mg/Kg/week and Ribavarin (Rebetol,
Schering-Plough Corp.) at a dosage of either 1,000 mg/
day (body weight <75 Kg) or 1,200 mg/day (body
weight >75 Kg) were administered for 6 (genotype 2/3)
were collected at day 15, month 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 during
and after treatment and stored at ?808C.
Rapid and early virological responses were defined as
undetectable HCV RNA (sensitivity: 50 IU/ml) or ?2 log
viral load decline at weeks 4 and 12, respectively.
Nonresponders and relapsers were patients HCV RNA
an initial clearance of viremia. Sustained responders
at the end of treatment and of follow-up.
HCV RNA Quantitative Assays
COBAS AmpliPrepTM/COBAS TaqManTMHCV
One thousand fifty microliters of
each plasma sample was processed in automation
for RNA extraction and real-time PCR amplification
by the CAP/CTM HCV, following the instruction
of the manufacturer. In brief, after virion lysis and
glass-particle-mediated RNA capture and purification,
each specimen was transferred from the Cobas1
AmpliPrepTMto the Cobas TaqManTMfor real-time
amplification. An internal quantitation standard (QS)
is added to each sample to monitor the efficiency of
the process. The QS is a noninfections armored RNA
containing fragments of HCV sequences with primer
binding regions identical to those of the HCV target
sequence, but with a different detection probe. Preven-
The sensitivity of the system is 15 IU/ml with a
dynamic range from 43 to 6.9?107IU/ml and a 2 hr
turnaround time for 24 plasma specimens [Germer
et al., 2005; Caliendo et al., 2006; Sarrazin et al., 2006].
At the time of the introduction of the system in the
Laboratory, a commercially available panel of HCV
standards at concentration of 5,000,000; 500,000;
50,000; 5,000; 500; 50 and 0 IU/ml, (OptiQuant HCV
RNA; Acrometrix Corp., Benicia, CA) calibrated on
the 1st International WHO Standard, was used to
evaluate CAP/CTM performances. A single sample of
each standard was analyzed in four sequential days by
CAP/CTM and mean interassay variation was deter-
expected ones for each standard with an excellent
correlation (r¼0.995) and linearity (R2¼0.992). Inter-
IU, 5?105IU and 5?106IU, were, respectively, 43%,
32%, 27%, 19%, 1.7%, and 9.2%.
Bayer Diagnostic Corporation, Tarrytown, NY) was
used following the instruction of the manufacturer. The
J. Med. Virol. DOI 10.1002/jmv
HCV RNA Quantitation for Clinical Evaluation255
assay has a detection limit of 615 IU/ml and a dynamic
range up to 8?106IU/ml [Ross et al., 2002].
HCV RNA Qualitative Assay
Qualitative detection of HCV RNA was performed
using the COBAS Amplicor HCV system (Roche Molec-
50 IU/ml) to assess rapid, early, end of treatment and
sustained virological responses.
HCV genotypesand subtypes weredeterminedwith a
reverse hybridization line probe assay (INNO-LIPA,
Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium) after nested-PCR ampli-
fication of the 50NC viral region.
HCV Serologic Test
Antibody to HCV was detected in sera with a
Abbott Park, IL).
Mean, median, standard deviation were calculat-
ed using conventional statistical tests. Correlation
regression analysis and mean differences in quantita-
tion for averaged logs by the Bland–Altman plot. HCV
RNA results were expressed as log10IU/ml. Quantita-
tion differences between the two assays across HCV
genotype 1–4 were considered statistically significant
by the Bland–Altman analysis. Predictors of virological
response were assessed with Fisher exact test for
The performance of CAP/CTM was assessed and
compared with the bDNA on 576 plasma specimens,
HCV RNA testing and 176 samples from 31 patients
treated with PEG-InterferonþRibavarin combination
therapy and monitored at week 4, 12, at the end of
therapy and after 6 months of follow-up.
CAP/CTM and bDNA Comparison for HCV RNA
Quantitation on Routine Specimens
Branched-DNA and CAP/CTM tests detected HCV
RNA in 388 and 399 samples, respectively, with a
97.2% concordance. Eleven bDNA-negative CAP/CTM-
positive samples included 3 genotype 1a, 5 genotype 1b,
and 3 genotype 2a/2c, with HCV RNA levels ranging
from 43 to 5,540 IU/ml, being in eight samples lower
than the bDNA detection limit.
A good correlation (r¼0.893) was observed between
CTM; the correlation varied if stratified by viremia
range, being 0.786 for HCV RNA levels between 4.1 and
6 logs, but significantly lower for levels below 4 log and
above 6 logs (r¼0.431 and 0.427, respectively) (data not
shown). When data were analyzed according to HCV
genotypes, correlation coefficients were excellent for
genotype 1a (r¼0.923), 1b (r¼0.900) and 3a (r¼0.954)
and slightly lower for genotype 2a/2c (r¼0.845) and
4 (r¼0.852) (data not shown).
titers across all viral genotypes, with a wider standard
(range 0.6–1 log10). As shown in Table I, mean differ-
ences in quantitation between the bDNA and the CAP/
CTM ranged from ?0.26 log10 for genotype 4 to
?0.54 log10for genotype 3a. These differences reached
statistical significance for genotypes 1b (P<0.0001),
2a/2c (P¼0.01) and 3a (P¼0.02), while quantitation
difference in HCV genotype 1a and 4 were not signi-
ficant. In genotype 1a infected patients, the bDNA
detected significantly lower HCV RNA levels than in
genotype 1b (P¼0.03), but such difference was not
observed with the CAP/CTM test.
Bland–Altman analysis showed that differences
between the CAP/CTM and the bDNA were within ?1
log10IU/ml of the averaged log10results of the two tests
for 95% of the tested specimens (for genotype 1a: ?0.49,
0.74/?1.72; genotype 1b: ?0.45, ?1.26/0.37; genotype
J. Med. Virol. DOI 10.1002/jmv
TABLE I. HCV RNA Concentrations Measured by the bDNA and the CAP/CTM
According to Genotype 1–4
Results are expressed as HCV RNA log10IU/ml.
NS, not significant.
256Pittaluga et al.
2a/2c: ?0.4, ?1.56/0.75; genotype 3a: ?0.54, ?1.1/0.01;
genotype 4: ?0.26, ?0.98/0.46) (Fig. 1a–e).
HCV RNA quantitation by the CAP/CTM,
Rapid and Early Virological Response
responders (n¼17, 8 genotype 1b, 3 genotype 2a/2c,
5 genotype 3a and 1 genotype 4), nonresponder (n¼6,
3 genotype 1b, 1 genotype 1a, 1 genotype 3a and
1 genotype 4) and relapsers (n¼8, 5 genotype 1b,
2 genotype 2a/2c and 1 genotype 3a).
HCV RNA was quantified previously by the bDNA,
then retrospectively tested with the CAP/CTM and
results analyzed according to the rapid and early
virologic responses at weeks 4 and 12. For each patient,
follow-up. Mean levels of HCV RNA as detected with
by Figure 2, the extent of virus decay was better shown
by the CAP/CTM that could monitor viral load when it
fell below the bDNA detection limit.
estimate its ability to determine the rapid virological
response. As shown in Figure 3, at week 4 HCV viral
load showed a decline of ?2 log from baseline or a
virological responders (positive predictive value, PPV¼
71%), whereas 8 out of 10 patients who did not achieve a
rapid response,were nonresponders (negativepredictive
were early virological responders, achieved a sustained
virological response (PPV¼65%) while all those who did
not show the early response, were nonresponders
(NPV¼100%). The positive predictive value for the
sustained virological response differed significantly
(P¼0.00181, Fisher’s Exact test).
The ideal molecular test for HCV RNA detection and
quantitation has to be sensitive, accurate, genotype
J. Med. Virol. DOI 10.1002/jmv
Fig. 1. a–e: Bland–Altman analysis of genotype specific mean differences in HCV RNA quantitation
between the bDNA and the CAP/CTM.
HCV RNA Quantitation for Clinical Evaluation257
viral load changes as those seen during anti-viral
therapy and support informed clinical decision [Zeuzem
et al., 2001; Berg et al., 2003; Gerotto et al., 2006;
Sarrazin et al., 2006]. Real-time PCR technology
associated with automated extraction systems has the
potential to satisfy these requirements combining high
sensitivity and reproducibility with a linear amplifica-
tion over a wide dynamic range.
In the present study, the performance of a fully
automated system was evaluated for nucleic acid
extraction from plasma, the COBAS AmpliPrep (CAP),
in combination with the CTM HCV test, an automated
HCV quantitative assay based on the real-time PCR
technology (CAP/CTM). The CAP/CTM has been
reported to be extremely sensitive (15 IU/ml) [Germer
et al., 2005; Caliendo et al., 2006; Sarrazin et al., 2006;
7 logs [Konnick et al., 2005; Sizmann et al., 2007]. The
combined system allows for a more standardized HCV
RNA quantitation than the same real-time PCR assay
either manual or semi-automated platforms [Barbeau
et al., 2004; Germer et al., 2005; Caliendo et al., 2006;
Gelderblom et al., 2006]. Recent clinical observations
showed that quantitation of HCV RNA by the CAP/
CTM is adequate for the management of anti-HCV
therapeutic responses, identifying reliably responders
from nonresponder patients at both weeks 4 and 12 of
treatment [Halfon et al., 2006a,b; Sarrazin et al., 2006].
Routine anti-HCV positive samples and serial speci-
mens taken from patients undergoing antiviral therapy
were tested with the CAP/CTM assay and results were
compared to those obtained with the signal amplifica-
tion branched-DNA assay. The overall concordance
between the two assays was good; however, as expected
duetothe higher sensitivity of theCAP/CTM, lowlevels
of viremia (<5,000 IU/ml) were detected in most of the
bDNA-negative samples. This is an important finding
due to the fact that residual HCV viremia in patients
undergoing anti-HCV therapy are associated with a
high chance of relapse [Gerotto et al., 2006].
only for medium-high level of viremia (between 4 and
6 log10IU/ml) while, in lower and higher viral loads, the
CAP/CTM scored constantly better results than the
bDNA. Differences across HCV genotypes 1–4 varied
from ?0.26 to ?0.54 log10IU/ml (bDNA—CAP/CTM),
the largest and most significant observed within
genotype 1b, 2a/2c, and 3a. This may reflect different
methods in the calibration of the assays since both
manufacturers use the first international WHO Stand-
ard (96/790) as their reference. The branched-DNA
values were also significantly lower for subtype 1a than
for 1b, a finding not shown by the CAP/CTM.
conventional PCR and not-PCR based assays with real-
time PCR have shown wide differences among results
2006; Sarrazin et al., 2006] with an almost constant
Small differences were found when the CAP/CTM was
Monitor 2.0 (CAM), while larger differences were
observed between bDNA and CAM, suggesting the
possibility of a constant underestimation of HCV RNA
levels by the non-PCR based techniques, at least for
et al., 2006; Sizmann et al., 2007]. Recently, differences
ranging from ?1.61 to 0.03 logs were reported from a
study comparing the CAP/CTM and the CAM across
genotype 1, 2, 3, and 4 [Colson et al., 2006]. Under-
estimation of HCV RNA by the Cobas TaqMan HCV in
comparison with the bDNA has only been reported
for low volume (less than 500 ml) plasma samples
[Gelderblom et al., 2006]. These findings suggest that
the nucleic extraction method is crucial for HCV RNA
quantitation, affecting both the assay sensitivity and
the efficiency of quantitation. The poor RNA stability
in clinical samples may also play a role, but it can be
controlled by using the same sample aliquot for system
comparison reducing repeated freezing/thawing.
The results are in agreement with those published
by Sarrazin et al. , who reported a constant
J. Med. Virol. DOI 10.1002/jmv
HCV RNA IU/ml log
Fig. 2. Mean viral load levels measured by the CAP/CTM and the bDNA at frequent time points during
detection of the two methods for assessing HCV RNA.
258Pittaluga et al.
underestimation of HCV RNA by the bDNA test across
HCV genotype 1–4. Differences in HCV RNA quantita-
tion may be due to the sample extraction methods
and the viral load quantitation technology, gene versus
signal amplification and homogeneous versus, multiple
phases. On the other hand, Chevaliez et al. 
reported recently an underestimation of genotype 2 and
4 in 15% and 30% of their samples and speculated about
possible sequence variation not detected by the CAP/
CTM. While onlya slightunderestimation of genotype4
Sizmann et al., 2007], it is possible that some specific
efficiently quantified. However, no information was
ever published on the CAP/CTM primers and probe
sequences and any hypothesis about possible mis-
matches remains unconfirmed.
In this study, the ability of the CAP/CTM was
investigated to determine viral load changes during
antiviral treatment. In this respect, a viral load decline
?2 log IU/ml or a negative HCV RNA result as assessed
by CAP/CTM at week 4 was significantly predictive of
a sustained virological response in patients stratified
according to therapy outcome (Responders vs. Non-
patients who experienced a relapse after therapy
discontinuation, showed high levels of viremia at week
4. The high sensitivity and wide dynamic range of the
assay allows for the detection of early virological
responses useful to individualize treatment for patients
with chronic hepatitis C. In this respect, the lower
sensitivity of the bDNA test limits its utility in moni-
toring individual treatment response, particularly in
the assessment of the rapid virological response
at week 4.
Taken together, these data suggest that the CAP/
clinical samples and monitor viral load in patients
undergoing antiviral therapy.
Valeria Ghisetti was in charge of the evaluation and
comparison between the CAP/CTM and the bDNA on
the project, drafted the paper and supervised the
technical laboratory work and data analysis, while
Fabrizia Pittaluga, Tiziano Allice and Silvia Varetto
carried out the laboratory work. Francesco Cerutti
performed statistical analysis of the laboratory data.
Antonina Smedile was in charge of the clinical manage-
ment of the patients included in the study, with Maria
lorena Abate and Alessia Ciancio as collaborators.
Giuseppe Colucci contributed to the study design and
the editing of the manuscript.
Barbeau JM, Goforth J, Caliendo AM, Nolte FS. 2004. Performance
characteristics of a quantitative TaqMan hepatitis C virus RNA
analyte-specific reagent. J Clin Microbiol 42:3739–3746.
Wiedenmann B, Hopf U, Zeuzem S. 2003. Prediction of treatment
outcome in patients with chronic hepatitis C: Significance of
baseline parameters and viral dynamics during therapy. Hepatol-
Caliendo AM, Valsamakis A, Zhou Y, Yen-Lieberman B, Andersen J,
Young S, Ferreira-Gonzalez A, Tsongalis GJ, Pyles R, Bremer JW,
Lurain NS. 2006. Multilaboratory comparison of hepatitis C virus
viral load assays. J Clin Microbiol 44:1726–1732.
Chevaliez S, Bouvier-Alias M, Brillet R, Pawlotsky JM. 2007. Over-
widely used real-time polymerase chain reaction-based method.
J. Med. Virol. DOI 10.1002/jmv
Fig. 3. Rapid(atweek4)andearly(atweek12)virologicalresponses
in patients with different treatment outcomes as assessed using the
CAP/CTM. Results are expressed as HCV RNA log10IU/ml.
HCV RNA Quantitation for Clinical Evaluation259
Colson P, Motte A, Tamalet C. 2006. Broad differences between the Download full-text
COBAS ampliprep total nucleic acid isolation-COBAS TaqMan 48
hepatitis C virus (HCV) and COBAS HCV monitor v2.0 assays for
quantification of serum HCV RNA of non-1 genotypes. J Clin
J. 2003. Early virologic response to treatment with peginterferon
alfa-2b plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis. C.
of Taqman PCR for detecting divergent viral pathogens illustrated
by hepatitis A, B, C, and E viruses and human immunodeficiency
virus. J Clin Microbiol 41:2417–2427.
new rRoche COBAS Taq Man HCV test and High Pure System for
extraction, detection and quantitation of HCV RNA in plasma and
serum. Antivir Ther 11:95–103.
Germer JJ, Harmsen WS, Mandrekar JN, Mitchell PS, Yao JD. 2005.
Evaluation of the COBAS TaqMan HCV test with automated
sample processing using the MagNA pure LC instrument. J Clin
Gerotto M, Dal Pero F, Bortoletto G, Ferrari A, Pistis R, Sebastiani G,
Fagiuoli S,RealdonS,Alberti A.2006. Hepatitis C minimalresidual
therapy predicts post-treatment relapse. J Hepatol 44:83–87.
Halfon P, Bourliere M, Penaranda G, Khiri H, Ouzan D. 2006a. Real-
time PCR assays for hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA quantitation are
adequate for clinical management of patients with chronic HCV
infection. J Clin Microbiol 44:2507–2511.
Halfon P, Penaranda G, Bourliere M, Khiri H, Masseyeff MF, Ouzan D.
2006b. Assessment of early virological response to antiviral therapy
by comparing four assays for HCV RNA quantitation using the
international unit standard: Implications for clinical management of
patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J Med Virol 78:208–
Herrmann E, Zeuzem S, Sarrazin C, Hinrichsen H, Benhamou Y,
Manns MP, Reiser M, Reesink H, Calleja JL, Forns X, Steinmann
GG, Nehmiz G. 2006. Viral kinetics in patients with chronic
hepatitis C treated with the serine protease inhibitor BILN 2061.
Antivir Ther 11:371–376.
Konnick EQ, Williams SM, Ashwood ER, Hillyard DR. 2005. Evalua-
tion of the COBAS Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) TaqMan analyte-
Monitor V2.0 and Versant HCV bDNA 3.0 assays. J Clin Microbiol
Lukasiewicz E, Hellstrand K, Westin J, Ferrari C, Neumann AU,
Pawlotsky JM, Schalm SW, Zeuzem S, Veldt BJ, Hansen BE,
Verhey-Hart E, Lagging M. 2007. Predicting treatment outcome
following 24 weeks peginterferon alpha-2a/ribavirin therapy in
patients infected with HCV genotype 1: Utility of HCV-RNA at day
0, day 22, day 29, and week 6. Hepatology 45:258–259.
Mangia A, Santoro R, Minerva N, Ricci GL, Carretta V, Persico M,
Vinelli F, Scotto G, Bacca D, Annese M, Romano M, Zechini F,
Sogari F, Spirito F, Andriulli A. 2005. Peginterferon alfa-2b and
ribavirin for 12 vs 24 weeks in HCV genotype 2 or 3. N Engl J Med
Manns MP, McHutchison JG, Gordon SC, Rustgi VK, Shiffman M,
Reindollar R, Goodman ZD, Koury K, Ling M, Albrecht JK. 2001.
Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon
alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C:
A randomised trial. Lancet 358:958–965.
Pawlotsky JM, Bouvier-Alias M, Hezode C, Darthuy F, Remire J,
Dhumeaux D. 2000. Standardization of hepatitis C virus RNA
quantification. Hepatology 32:654–659.
Perelson AS, Herrmann E, Micol F, Zeuzem S. 2005. New kinetic
models for the hepatitis C virus. Hepatology 42:749–754.
DNA-based signal amplification assay. J Virol Methods 101:159–
Sarrazin C, Gartner BC, Sizmann D, Babiel R, Mihm U, Hofmann W,
von Wagner M, Zeuzem S. 2006. Comparison of conventional PCR
5. J Clin Microbiol 44:729–737.
Sizmann D, Boeck C, Boelter J, Fischer D, Miethke M, Nicolaus S,
Zadak M, Babiel R. 2007. Fully automated quantification of
hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in human plasma and human
serum by the COBAS1Ampliprep/COBAS1Taqman1system.
J Clin Virol 38:326–333.
Strader DB, Wright T, Thomas DL, Seeff LB. 2004. American
association for the study of liver diseases. Diagnosis, management,
and treatment of hepatitis C. Hepatology 39:1147–1171.
Zeuzem S, Herrmann E, Lee JH, Fricke J, Neumann AU, Modi M,
Coluggi G, Roth WK. 2001. Viral kinetics in patients with chronic
hepatitis C treated with standard or peginterferon alpha2a.
Zeuzem S, Hultcrantz R, Bourliere M, Goeser T, Marcellin P, Sanchez-
Tapias J, Sarrazin C, Harvey J, Brass C, Albrecht J. 2004.
Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for treatment of chronic
hepatitis C in previously untreated patients infected with HCV
genotypes 2 or 3. J Hepatol 40:993–999.
Zeuzem S, Buti M, Ferenci P, Sperl J, Horsmans Y, Cianciara J,
Ibranyi E, Weiland O, Noviello S, Brass C, Albrecht J. 2006.
Efficacy of 24 weeks treatment with peginterferon alfa-2b plus
1 and low pretreatment viremia. J Hepatol 44:97–103.
J. Med. Virol. DOI 10.1002/jmv
260 Pittaluga et al.