Correspondence of the NCI Fruit and Vegetable Screener to repeat 24-H recalls and serum carotenoids in behavioral intervention trials

Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.
Journal of Nutrition (Impact Factor: 3.88). 02/2008; 138(1):200S-204S.
Source: PubMed


Five sites participating in the NCI Behavior Change Consortium administered the NCI Fruit and Vegetable Screener (FVS) and multiple, nonconsecutive 24-h dietary recall interviews (24HR) to 590 participants. Three sites also obtained serum carotenoids (n = 295). Participants were primarily female, ethnically diverse, and varied by age and education. Correlations between 24HR and FVS by site ranged from 0.31 (P = 0.07) to 0.47 (P < 0.01) in men and from 0.43 to 0.63 (P < 0.01) in women. Compared with 24HR, FVS significantly (P < 0.05) overestimated intake at 2 of 4 sites for men and all 4 sites for women. Differences in estimated total servings of fruits and vegetables/d ranged from 0.16 to 3.06 servings. On average, the FVS overestimated intake by 1.76 servings in men and 2.11 servings in women. Alternative FVS scoring procedures and a 1-item screener lowered correlations with 24HR as well as serum carotenoids but alternate scoring procedures generally improved estimations of servings.

Download full-text


Available from: Amy Yaroch,
  • Source
    • "The main outcome, assessed at each time point, was FV intake measured using a modified version of the 10-item NCI FV screener (Greene et al., 2008; Peterson et al., 2008; Thompson et al., 2002). The modified 19-item version included nine additional FV available at the FM (e.g., peach, apple, orange, cantaloupe, cabbage, broccoli, squash/zucchini, sweet potato, tomato). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: A 22-week federally qualified health center (FQHC)-based farmers' market (FM) and personal financial incentive intervention designed to improve access to and consumption of fruits and vegetables (FVs) among low-income diabetics in rural South Carolina was evaluated. Methods: A mixed methods, one-group, repeated-measures design was used. Data were collected in 2011 before (May/June), during (August), and after (November) the intervention with 41 diabetes patients from the FQHC. FV consumption was assessed using a validated National Cancer Institute FV screener modified to include FV sold at the FM. Sales receipts were recorded for all FM transactions. A mixed-model, repeated measures analysis of variance was used to assess intervention effects on FV consumption. Predictors of changes in FV consumption were examined using logistic regression. Results: A marginally significant (p=0.07) average increase of 1.6 servings of total FV consumption per day occurred. The odds of achieving significant improvements in FV consumption increased for diabetics using financial incentives for payment at the FM (OR: 38.8, 95% CI: 3.4-449.6) and for those frequenting the FM more often (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.1-4.0). Conclusions: Results reveal a dose-response relationship between the intervention and FV improvements and emphasize the importance of addressing economic barriers to food access.
    Preventive Medicine 02/2013; 56(5). DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.01.018 · 3.09 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Two recent systematic reviews concluded the association between the neighborhood food environment and dietary intake was weak and inconsistent [31, 32]. This area of research has been criticized for reliance on less rigorous study designs (e.g., cross sectional studies) and limitations in measurement of diet (i.e., under- and overreporting are significant problems with several measures of diet, particularly food frequency questionnaires [83]) and the food environment [84]. In this study, it was hypothesized that mediation effects of home availability of fruits and vegetables and moderation effects of impact of weekly stressful events would contribute to greater understanding of the food environment and fruit and vegetable consumption, but mediation and moderation effects were not found. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. Mediating and moderating variables may interfere with the association between neighborhood availability of grocery stores (NAG) and supermarkets (NAS) and fruit and vegetable (FV) intake. Objective. The purpose of this study was to test mediation of home availability of FV (HAFV) and moderation of impact of weekly stressful events (IWSE) on the association between NAG and NAS with FV consumption among African American (AA) and Hispanic/Latina (HL) women. Methods. Three hundred nine AA and HL, 25-60 year old women in the Health Is Power (HIP) randomized controlled trial completed validated measures of HAFV, IWSE, and FV intake at baseline. Trained field assessors coded NAG and NAS. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Results. NAG and NAS were not associated with FV intake or HAFV, so HAFV was not a mediator. HAFV (std. Beta = .29, P < 0.001) and IWSE (std. Beta = .17; P < 0.05) were related to FV intake (R(2) = 0.17; P < 0.001), but IWSE was not a moderator. Conclusion. Increasing HAFV and decreasing the IWSE should increase FV consumption. The extent to which the neighborhood environment is related to the home food environment and diet, and the mechanisms for the association between IWSE and diet should be examined in future research.
    Journal of obesity 05/2012; 2012(4):737891. DOI:10.1155/2012/737891
  • Source
    • "Participants also reported whether they restrict carbohydrates or starchy foods, sweet or sugary foods, fatty foods, red meat, fish, chicken, or pork, or whether they ate all these foods (indicating that they did not restrict any of these foods in their diet). Reported fruit and vegetable consumption was calculated using NCI's Fruit and Vegetable Screener, a validated instrument (Greene et al., 2008; Thompson, Midthune, et al., 2002; Thompson, Subar, et al., 2002 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Worry has been shown to predict a variety of health behaviors, such as cancer screening, yet there are few studies linking worry and nutrition. This study used nationally representative data from National Cancer Institute's Food Attitudes and Behavior Survey (n = 3,397) to examine the association between health-related worry and a variety of nutrition behaviors. Greater worry was associated with higher fruit and vegetable consumption (B = 0.19, p < .01), but also more meals eaten when watching television (B = 0.34, p < .01) and fewer with family (B = -0.13, p = .02). Importantly, and counterintuitively, greater worry appeared to reverse the conventional relationship between self-efficacy and dietary restriction; those who were self-efficacious and worried were less likely to restrict unhealthy foods. Similarly, worry attenuated the relationship between perceived benefits and special effort to buy produce. A complex relationship between worry and nutrition emerged, with potentially important clinical implications.
    Health Education & Behavior 04/2012; 40(1). DOI:10.1177/1090198112439410 · 2.23 Impact Factor
Show more