Article

Total knee replacement with and without patellar resurfacing - A prospective, randomised trial using the profix total knee system

School of Surgery and Pathology (Orthopaedics) University of Western Australia, Gate 3, Verdun Street, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
The Bone & Joint Journal (Impact Factor: 2.8). 02/2008; 90(1):43-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B1.18986
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We have examined the differences in clinical outcome of total knee replacement (TKR) with and without patellar resurfacing in a prospective, randomised study of 181 osteoarthritic knees in 142 patients using the Profix total knee system which has a femoral component with features considered to be anatomical and a domed patellar implant. The procedures were carried out between February 1998 and November 2002. A total of 159 TKRs in 142 patients were available for review at a mean of four years (3 to 7). The patients and the clinical evaluator were blinded in this prospective study. Evaluation was undertaken annually by an independent observer using the knee pain scale and the Knee Society clinical rating system. Specific evaluation of anterior knee pain, stair-climbing and rising from a seated to a standing position was also undertaken. No benefit was shown of TKR with patellar resurfacing over that without resurfacing with respect to any of the measured outcomes. In 22 of 73 knees (30.1%) with and 18 of 86 knees (20.9%) without patellar resurfacing there was some degree of anterior knee pain (p = 0.183). No revisions related to the patellofemoral joint were performed in either group. Only one TKR in each group underwent a re-operation related to the patellofemoral joint. A significant association between knee flexion contracture and anterior knee pain was observed in those knees with patellar resurfacing (p = 0.006).

1 Follower
 · 
74 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is still controversial whether or not to resurface patella during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One of the reasons may be insensitive measurement tools. We conducted a randomized controlled study to compare kinematic and kinetic parameters of resurfacing and nonresurfacing patella with the Vicon gait analysis system. The results show that patient post-operative gait of the two groups improved compared to pre-operative gait. Part of gait parameters, knee flexion at heel-strike, double limb support time and maximum adduction angle appeared to be statistically difference in 3 months, but 12 months later, the gait parameters of the two groups had no significant difference. Therefore, it seems that the final function of knee after TKA is not related whether or not to resurface patella.
    Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) 10/2010; 15(5):632-636. DOI:10.1007/s12204-010-1060-9
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The controversy over whether or not to routinely resurface the patella during a total knee arthroplasty has persisted despite three decades of successful joint replacement procedures. Advocates for routine patellar resurfacing admit the occasional need for secondary patellar resurfacing and declare increased incidence of anterior knee pain in patients with non-resurfaced patellae as a cause for worry. Surgeons that leave the patella unresurfaced cite avoidance of complications that include patellar fracture, avascular necrosis, patellar tendon injury and instability. This review discusses the available literature on patellar resurfacing through an evidence-based analysis of randomized and pseudo-randomized controlled trials and published meta-analyses to date. The published literature seems to favour resurfacing the patellar routinely. Selective patellar resurfacing would be the ideal solution if sound pre-operative criteria could be established. So far, a method for accurately predicting which patients can avoid patellar resurfacing has not been found. Future research looking at patellar resurfacing should concentrate on developing criteria for selecting those patients that would benefit from patellar resurfacing and those that would do as well without resurfacing, and thus, limiting potential surgical complications.
    ANZ Journal of Surgery 03/2010; 80(4):223 - 233. DOI:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05242.x · 1.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: HintergrundDie freie Beweglichkeit in den Gelenken, insbesondere der Extremitäten, ist eine Grundlage ungehinderter Mobilität und Autonomie im hohen Alter. In internationalen Publikationen wird eine Kontrakturprävalenz von 15% bis über 70% bei älteren Patienten im Krankenhaus genannt. Die spezifischen Merkmale der untersuchten Populationen und Settings, aber auch unterschiedliche Definitionen und Methoden der Datenerhebung dürften für diese Variation verantwortlich sein. Kontrakturen führen zu zusätzlichem Pflegeaufwand. Die unlängst verabschiedeten Transparenzkriterien für die Qualitätsbeurteilung der stationären Altenhilfe beinhalten auch Items zur Einschätzung des Kontrakturrisikos und zur Kontrakturprophylaxe. Hierzu bedarf es einer einheitlichen Definition der Kontraktur. Die Literaturanalyse hatte zum Ziel, die in klinischen Studien zugrunde gelegte Definition der Kontraktur zu sichten. MethodenEs erfolgte eine systematische Literaturrecherche in den Datenbanken PubMed, CINAHL, Embase und Cochrane Library nach kontrollierten Studien, die Kontraktur als primären, sekundären oder unerwünschten Ergebnisparameter definierten, in englischer oder deutscher Sprache verfasst und nach 1985 publiziert wurden. Zwei Reviewer sichteten die Abstracts und Volltexte unabhängig voneinander und extrahierten die Daten. Fehlende Übereinstimmungen wurden im Konsensusverfahren unter Einbeziehung eines dritten Reviewers gelöst. ErgebnisseInsgesamt 37 kontrollierte Studien entsprachen den Einschlusskriterien. Die Studien waren vorwiegend im Krankenhaus durchgeführt worden und hatten Patienten im Alter von 18 bis über 90Jahren eingeschlossen. In nur 5 Publikationen wurde eine Kontraktur präzise definiert. Jedoch wichen diese Definitionen bezüglich der Merkmale zur Erfassung einer Kontraktur voneinander ab. In 31Studien wurden vorwiegend diagnostische Kriterien angeführt. Eine Studie nannte weder eine Definition noch diagnostische Merkmale. SchlussfolgerungDie Mehrheit der kontrollierten Studien, die eine Kontraktur als Ergebnisparameter untersuchten, verwendeten keine präzise Definition. Diese Diversität von Definitionen und Erhebungsmerkmalen macht eine Vergleichbarkeit von präventiven und therapeutischen Therapieeffekten unmöglich. In diesem Zusammenhang erscheint es außerordentlich problematisch, den nicht definierten Zustand der Kontraktur im Rahmen von Qualitätssicherungsprogrammen nach §113 SGBXI in Heimen zu erfassen. BackgroundFree movement of the limbs is a prerequisite of mobility and autonomy in old age. The prevalence of contractures in international studies has been reported to range between 15% and 70%. The wide variation might be explained by different definitions and diagnostic criteria, settings, and participants’ characteristics. Contractures lead to additional nursing demands. In Germany, contracture risk assessment and prevention have been recently defined as a quality indicator of nursing home care that should be regularly monitored by expert raters of the statutory health insurance system. Therefore, it is necessary to have a clear definition of contracture. The goal of this literature review was to identify definitions of contractures used in controlled trials. MethodsA systematic literature search of controlled trials investigating contracture as primary, secondary, or adverse outcome was conducted using the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The search was limited to articles published after 1985 and written in English or German language. Publications were excluded, if animals, children, or congenital contracture were investigated. Two reviewers independently screened the abstracts and extracted data from full publications. Disagreement was solved by consensus involving a third reviewer. ResultsInitially, 544publications were identified; 37controlled studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included. A total of 33studies investigated contracture as primary outcome, three as secondary outcome, and one as adverse outcome. Five studies clearly defined the term contracture. However, all these definitions are different. In 31studies, only the diagnostic criteria were mentioned and one study mentioned neither a definition nor specific diagnostic criteria. ConclusionThe majority of clinical trials investigating contracture as outcome parameter do not provide a clear definition. However, the success of contracture prevention and treatment in clinical trials and practice can only be judged in the presence of a clear definition. Thus, it appears especially difficult to use contracture as a quality indicator for nursing homes. SchlüsselwörterKontraktur-Gelenke-Bewegungsgrad-Älterer Mensch-Klinische Studien KeywordsContracture-Joints-Range of motion-Elderly-Clinical trials
    Zeitschrift für Gerontologie + Geriatrie 06/2010; 43(3):147-157. DOI:10.1007/s00391-009-0089-6 · 1.02 Impact Factor