Article

Inhibitory control and emotional stress regulation: Neuroimaging evidence for frontal-limbic dysfunction in psycho-stimulant addiction

Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, Connecticut Mental Health Center S103, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (Impact Factor: 10.28). 02/2008; 32(3):581-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.10.003
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This review focuses on neuroimaging studies that examined stress processing and regulation and cognitive inhibitory control in patients with psycho-stimulant addiction. We provide an overview of these studies, summarizing converging evidence and discrepancies as they occur in the literature. We also adopt an analytic perspective and dissect these psychological processes into their sub-components, to identify the neural pathways specific to each component process and those that are more specifically involved in psycho-stimulant addiction. To this aim we refer frequently to studies conducted in healthy individuals. Despite the separate treatment of stress/affect regulation, stress-related craving or compulsive drug seeking, and inhibitory control, neural underpinnings of these processes overlap significantly. In particular, the ventromedial prefrontal regions including the anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala and the striatum are implicated in psychostimulant dependence. Our overarching thesis is that prefrontal activity ensures intact emotional stress regulation and inhibitory control. Altered prefrontal activity along with heightened striatal responses to addicted drug and drug-related salient stimuli perpetuates habitual drug seeking. Further studies that examine the functional relationships of these neural systems will likely provide the key to understanding the mechanisms underlying compulsive drug use behaviors in psycho-stimulant dependence.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Chiang-shan Ray Li, Jul 30, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
233 Views
  • Source
    • "Taken together, the available literature suggests that stimulant dependence is linked to attenuated neural processing of nondrug-related cues, regardless of appetitive or aversive context. Frontocingulate regions including DLPFC are also structurally and functionally altered in stimulant dependence (Bechara, 2005; Ersche et al., 2012; Franklin et al., 2002; Goldstein & Volkow, 2002, 2011; Li & Sinha, 2008; Schwartz et al., 2010) and both ACC and DLPFC are active during interoceptive processing in healthy individuals, likely as part of a monitoring and top-down inhibitory circuit regulating reactions to aversive stimuli (Critchley, Wiens, Rotshtein, Ohman, & Dolan, 2004; Paulus This work was supported by grants from the "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inability to appropriately process afferent interoceptive stimuli may contribute to initiation and/or escalation of substance use. An aversive interoceptive stimulus probed neural processing in problem stimulant users (PSU; n = 19), 18 desisted stimulant users (DSU; n = 18), and healthy comparison subjects (CTL; n = 21). Participants completed a continuous performance task while they anticipated and experienced 40 cm H2O/L/sec inspiratory breathing loads during fMRI. PSU exhibited lower left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) activation than DSU and CTL across trials. Greater lifetime drug use due to stimulants was also linked to lower activation in these regions. In addition, PSU displayed lower right IFG and insula activation during breathing load than DSU and CTL. Findings suggest that transition to stimulant use disorders is marked by weakened attentional salience of aversive stimuli.
    Psychophysiology 10/2014; 52(2). DOI:10.1111/psyp.12303 · 3.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Our finding that IFCorb activity is more negatively correlated with activity in the thalamus and precentral gyrus during stop success than during go success is consistent with the proposed pathway of motor inhibition from the IFC to the primary motor cortex (Aron, 2011; Chambers, Garavan, & Bellgrove, 2009). Consistent with our PPI results in reappraise distressing > look distressing , results from previous studies have demonstrated an inverse relationship between the IFCorb and amygdala activity during regulation of negative emotions (Lieberman et al., 2007; Wager et al., 2008). Although, to our knowledge , no previous study has demonstrated an inverse relationship between the IFC and insula activity during craving regulation, the insula would be a plausible target for downregulation, given its critical role in craving, including cigarette craving (Craig, 2009; Naqvi, Rudrauf, Damasio, & Bechara, 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It has been posited that self-regulation of behaviors, emotions, and temptations may all rely on a common resource. Recent reviews suggest this common resource may include the inferior frontal cortex (IFC). However, to our knowledge no single functional neuroimaging study has tested this hypothesis. We obtained fMRI scans as 25 abstinent treatment-seeking cigarette smokers completed motor, affective, and craving self-control tasks before smoking cessation treatment. We identified two regions in left IFC and a region in pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) that were commonly activated in all three tasks. Further, PPI analyses suggest that IFC may involve dissociable pathways in each self-control domain. Specifically, the IFC showed negative functional connectivity with large portions of the thalamus and precentral gyrus during motor stopping, with the insula and other portions of the thalamus during craving regulation, and potentially with a small limbic region during emotion regulation. We discuss implications for understanding self-control mechanisms.
    09/2014; 2(5):611-619. DOI:10.1177/2167702614522037
  • Source
    • "(Although, it should be noted that our approach of linking brain functional connectivity to cognitive task performance parallels a recent study of cocaine-dependent individuals in which perigenual ACC-lateral PFC connectivity was found to be correlated with performance on reversal learning and delay discounting tasks [Camchong et al., 2011]). There is a growing literature associating SUD with deficits in executive function and cognitive control using tasks, like the CWIT, that require inhibition of prepotent response tendencies [Giancola and Moss, 1998; Li and Sinha, 2008; Lyvers, 2000; Mintzer and Stitzer, 2002]. The dACC and dlPFC clusters identified in the present functional connectivity analysis are particularly notable for their overlap with regions shown to be hypoactive during a response inhibition task in cocaine users [Hester and Garavan, 2004; Kaufman et al., 2003]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Substance use disorders (SUD) have been associated with dysfunction in reward processing, habit formation, and cognitive-behavioral control. Accordingly, neurocircuitry models of addiction highlight roles for nucleus accumbens, dorsal striatum, and prefrontal/anterior cingulate cortex. However, the precise nature of the disrupted interactions between these brain regions in SUD, and the psychological correlates thereof, remain unclear. Here we used magnetic resonance imaging to measure rest-state functional connectivity of three key striatal nuclei (nucleus accumbens, dorsal caudate, and dorsal putamen) in a sample of 40 adult male prison inmates (n = 22 diagnosed with SUD; n = 18 without SUD). Relative to the non-SUD group, the SUD group exhibited significantly lower functional connectivity between the nucleus accumbens and a network of frontal cortical regions involved in cognitive control (dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and frontal operculum). There were no group differences in functional connectivity for the dorsal caudate or dorsal putamen. Moreover, the SUD group exhibited impairments in laboratory measures of cognitive-behavioral control, and individual differences in functional connectivity between nucleus accumbens and the frontal cortical regions were related to individual differences in measures of cognitive-behavioral control across groups. The strength of the relationship between functional connectivity and cognitive control did not differ between groups. These results indicate that SUD is associated with abnormal interactions between subcortical areas that process reward (nucleus accumbens) and cortical areas that govern cognitive-behavioral control. Hum Brain Mapp, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Human Brain Mapping 09/2014; 35(9). DOI:10.1002/hbm.22474 · 6.92 Impact Factor
Show more