Article

Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States: Part II

NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Arthritis & Rheumatology (Impact Factor: 7.87). 01/2008; 58(1):26-35. DOI: 10.1002/art.23176
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To provide a single source for the best available estimates of the US prevalence of and number of individuals affected by osteoarthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis, gout, fibromyalgia, and carpal tunnel syndrome, as well as the symptoms of neck and back pain. A companion article (part I) addresses additional conditions.
The National Arthritis Data Workgroup reviewed published analyses from available national surveys, such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the National Health Interview Survey. Because data based on national population samples are unavailable for most specific rheumatic conditions, we derived estimates from published studies of smaller, defined populations. For specific conditions, the best available prevalence estimates were applied to the corresponding 2005 US population estimates from the Census Bureau, to estimate the number affected with each condition.
We estimated that among US adults, nearly 27 million have clinical osteoarthritis (up from the estimate of 21 million for 1995), 711,000 have polymyalgia rheumatica, 228,000 have giant cell arteritis, up to 3.0 million have had self-reported gout in the past year (up from the estimate of 2.1 million for 1995), 5.0 million have fibromyalgia, 4-10 million have carpal tunnel syndrome, 59 million have had low back pain in the past 3 months, and 30.1 million have had neck pain in the past 3 months.
Estimates for many specific rheumatic conditions rely on a few, small studies of uncertain generalizability to the US population. This report provides the best available prevalence estimates for the US, but for most specific conditions more studies generalizable to the US or addressing understudied populations are needed.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Fred Wolfe, Jun 28, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
180 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transforming growth factor beta (TGFb) is a major signalling pathway in joints. This superfamilly is involved in numerous cellular processes in cartilage. Usually, they are considered to favor chondrocyte differentiation and cartilage repair. However, other studies show also deleterious effects of TGFb which may induce hypertrophy. This may be explained at least in part by alteration of TGFb signaling pathways in aging chondrocytes. This review focuses on the functions of TGFb in joints and the regulation of its signaling mediators (receptors, Smads) during aging and osteoarthritis.
    12/2014; 5(6):394-405. DOI:10.14336/AD.2014.0500394
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Total hip arthroplasty is the standard treatment to reduce pain and improve function in people with advanced hip osteoarthritis; however, persisting asymmetrical gait patterns have been identified in level walking. Therefore, this study evaluated limb asymmetries during stair ascent and descent in patients pre-operatively through 1year after a hip replacement. It was hypothesized that lower extremity mechanics would improve on the surgical side, but asymmetries would persist through one year. Kinematics and kinetics were collected during seven ascending and descending trials pre-operatively, 6weeks, and 1year post-operatively for 42 hip replacement patients. Data were analyzed using 2∗3 (Limb∗Time) within-subject repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) to determine significant differences between limbs across time (P<.05). Significant changes across time, independent of limb included: peak hip flexion, extension, and adduction during ascent. Peak hip flexion and extension, hip flexion moment, adduction and abduction moments, and propulsive vertical ground reaction force were different during descent (P<.05). Independent of time, significant asymmetries between limbs were observed in peak hip flexion, hip abduction, and hip extension moments during ascent, and in peak hip abduction moment during descent (P<.05). Abnormal movement patterns on the surgical side increase demands on other joints and could lead to permanent joint damage. These side-to-side differences in joint mechanics should be addressed during the early post-operative period through additional interventions in an attempt to normalize the differences and potentially improve long-term joint health throughout the lower extremity. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 11/2014; 30(1). DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.11.004 · 1.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: This study compared the impact of cognitive-behavioral therapy for pain (CBT-P), mindful awareness and acceptance treatment (M), and arthritis education (E) on day-to-day pain- and stress-related changes in cognitions, symptoms, and affect among adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Method: One hundred forty-three RA patients were randomized to 1 of the 3 treatment conditions. CBT-P targeted pain-coping skills; M targeted awareness and acceptance of current experience to enhance coping with a range of aversive experiences; E provided information regarding RA pain and its management. At pre- and posttreatment, participants completed 30 consecutive evening diaries assessing that day's pain, fatigue, pain-related catastrophizing and perceived control, morning disability, and serene and anxious affects. Results: Multilevel models compared groups in the magnitude of within-person change in daily pain and stress reactivity from pre- to posttreatment. M yielded greater reductions than did CBT-P and E in daily pain-related catastrophizing, morning disability, and fatigue and greater reductions in daily stress-related anxious affect. CBT-P yielded less pronounced declines in daily pain-related perceived control than did M and E. Conclusions: For individuals with RA, M produces the broadest improvements in daily pain and stress reactivity relative to CBT-P and E. These findings also highlight the utility of a diary-based approach to evaluating the treatment-related changes in responses to daily life. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).
    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 11/2014; 83(1). DOI:10.1037/a0038200 · 4.85 Impact Factor