Access to and use of health services among undocumented Mexican immigrants in a US urban area.

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.23). 02/2008; 98(11):2011-20. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.096222
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We assessed access to and use of health services among Mexican-born undocumented immigrants living in New York City in 2004.
We used venue-based sampling to recruit participants from locations where undocumented immigrants were likely to congregate. Participants were 18 years or older, born in Mexico, and current residents of New York City. The main outcome measures were health insurance coverage, access to a regular health care provider, and emergency department care.
In multivariable models, living in a residence with fewer other adults, linguistic acculturation, higher levels of formal income, higher levels of social support, and poor health were associated with health insurance coverage. Female gender, fewer children, arrival before 1997, higher levels of formal income, health insurance coverage, greater social support, and not reporting discrimination were associated with access to a regular health care provider. Higher levels of education, higher levels of formal income, and poor health were associated with emergency department care.
Absent large-scale political solutions to the challenges of undocumented immigrants, policies that address factors shown to limit access to care may improve health among this growing population.

  • Source
    • "Immigrants have been found to suffer progressively worse health outcomes over time as they struggle with incorporation into U.S. society. Longterm poverty, the stress of incorporation into the dominant Anglo society, as well as racial discrimination have been argued to be contributing factors for adverse health outcomes (Nandi et al., 2008; Sullivan & Rehm, 2005). Latino immigrants face considerable disadvantages in obtaining health care services compared to native-born Latinos (Shobe, Coffman, & Dmochowski, 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article presents findings from a qualitative study of Latino immigrant experiences seeking health care services in the wake of an anti-immigrant “crackdown” ordinance similar to Arizona's SB 1070. Prince William County, Virginia's 2007 “Rule of Law” ordinance escalated law enforcement efforts that targeted this population for deportation and ordered staff to ensure that no one receive social services other than those required by federal law. This article sought to answer the questions: (1) Were undocumented immigrants able to obtain health care? (2) How do immigrants characterize their experiences with health providers? Data were gathered via semi-structured interviews (n = 57) with Latinos in a low-income neighborhood. Analysis of Spanish-language narratives found that many were dissuaded from seeking care because of high costs as well as lack of familiarity with the health care system. Others perceived that they were treated with insensitivity or outright hostility—and believed this treatment was a deliberate effort to discourage them from seeking help.
    Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 10/2012; 22(7):771-788. DOI:10.1080/10911359.2012.704781
  • Source
    • "Over the years, demographic and social factors have shown to contribute to people's decision to participate in health promotion programs (Sohler et al., 2009; Tedstone Doherty & Kartalova-O'Doherty, 2010). Migratory status has also proved to influence the use of health services (Kim et al., 2010; Kim, Jang, Chiriboga, Ma, & Schonfeld, 2010; Leduc, 1999; Leduc et al., 1999; Nandi et al., 2008). Nonetheless, there has been little attention to the individual motivation for enrollment in HIV prevention programs, except for a couple of meta-analyses (Durantini & Albarracin, 2009; Durantini et al., 2006; Noguchi et al., 2007), even when the government has been spending vast resources on that field. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although reducing HIV risk is a primary motive for the design of HIV prevention interventions, the goals of the clients may be very different. Social theories of gender suggest that women, who often seek to resolve social and relational problems, may see HIV-prevention counseling as a mean of resolving partner violence. In contrast, men, who often worry about their physical strength, may seek to enroll in HIV-prevention programs when they experience physical symptoms unrelated to HIV. An unobtrusive study was conducted to observe enrollment in HIV risk-reduction counseling after measuring partner-violence complaints (e.g., feeling threatened or being hit), emotional complaints (e.g., fatigue or anxiety), and physical complaints (e.g., cardiovascular or digestive symptoms). The sample was a group of 350 participants, 70% clients from a state-health department in North Central Florida and 30% community members. Consistent with predictions, complaints of partner violence had a positive association with enrollment in women but not in men, whereas complaints about physical health had a positive association with enrollment in men, but not in women. Emotional complaints did not predict enrollment in either gender group. This study suggests that broad, gender-specific population needs must be competently addressed within HIV-prevention programs and may be strategically used to increase program enrollment.
    AIDS Care 03/2012; 24(10):1197-203. DOI:10.1080/09540121.2012.661834 · 1.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Medicine is increasingly committed to a scientific discourse that defines 'best medical practice' as based in quantitatively documented 'medical efficacy' and 'evidence-based practice'. There exists a large epidemiological literature documenting social disparities in health related to Latino migrant workers (Lara et al. 2004; Zsembik and Fennell 2005; Organista 2007; Barr 2008; Nandi et al. 2008). This literature has revealed, for example, the perplexing phenomenon of the 'Latino public health paradox', i.e., the association between deteriorating health outcomes and length of residence and acculturation in the US (Prislin et al. 1988; Kaplan and Marks 1990; Balcazar and Krull 1999). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Latino immigrants in the United States constitute a paradigmatic case of a population group subject to structural violence. Their subordinated location in the global economy and their culturally depreciated status in the United States are exacerbated by legal persecution. Medical Anthropology, Volume 30, Numbers 4 and 5, include a series of ethnographic analyses of the processes that render undocumented Latino immigrants structurally vulnerable to ill health. We hope to extend the social science concept of "structural vulnerability" to make it a useful concept for health care. Defined as a positionality that imposes physical/emotional suffering on specific population groups and individuals in patterned ways, structural vulnerability is a product of class-based economic exploitation and cultural, gender/sexual, and racialized discrimination, as well as complementary processes of depreciated subjectivity formation. A good-enough medicalized recognition of the condition of structural vulnerability offers a tool for developing practical therapeutic resources. It also facilitates political alternatives to the punitive neoliberal policies and discourses of individual unworthiness that have become increasingly dominant in the United States since the 1980s.
    Medical Anthropology 07/2011; 30(4):339-62. DOI:10.1080/01459740.2011.576725 · 1.88 Impact Factor
Show more


Available from