Crossmodal propagation of sensory-evoked and spontaneous activity in the rat neocortex

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, United States.
Neuroscience Letters (Impact Factor: 2.03). 03/2008; 431(3):191-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.11.069
Source: PubMed


In the cortex, neural responses to crossmodal stimulation are seen both in higher association areas and in primary sensory areas, and are thought to play a role in integration of crossmodal sensations. We used voltage-sensitive dye imaging (VSDI) to study the spatiotemporal characteristics of such crossmodal neural activity. We imaged three cortical regions in rat: primary visual cortex (V1), barrel field of primary somatosensory cortex (S1bf) and parietal association area (PA, flanked by V1 and S1bf). We find that sensory-evoked population activity can propagate in the form of a distinct propagating wave, robustly in either crossmodal direction. In single trials, the waveforms changed continuously during propagation, with dynamic variability from trial to trial, which we interpret as evidence for cortical involvement in the spreading process. To further characterize the functional anatomy of PA, we also studied the propagation of spontaneous sleep-like waves in this area. Using a novel flow-detection algorithm, we detected a propagation bias within PA of spontaneous waves--these tend to propagate parallel to the crossmodal axis, rather than orthogonal to it. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that intracortical networks show pre-attentive crossmodal propagation of activity, and suggest a potential mechanism for the establishment of crossmodal integration.

Download full-text


Available from: Kentaroh Takagaki,
  • Source
    • "The onset delay for contralateral visual responses during down states was 98.43 ± 19.05 ms (ranging between 56.7 and 141.0 ms, n = 25), almost five times longer than the onset response to whisker stimulation (19.78 ± 3.42 ms, Figure 1F) and similar to previously reported visual responses (Schulz et al., 2009, 2011). Such delays are expected when comparing to the long and variable delays (50–130 ms) described for visual responses in mouse visual cortex (Niell and Stryker, 2008; Takagaki et al., 2008). In order to verify the occurrence of cortical visual responses, we obtained extracellular recordings (LFP) in V1 simultaneously with the striatal whole-cell recordings (n = 16, Figures 3C and 3D). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The basal ganglia are involved in sensorimotor functions and action selection, both of which require the integration of sensory information. In order to determine how such sensory inputs are integrated, we obtained whole-cell recordings in mouse dorsal striatum during presentation of tactile and visual stimuli. All recorded neurons responded to bilateral whisker stimulation, and a subpopulation also responded to visual stimulation. Neurons responding to both visual and tactile stimuli were located in dorsomedial striatum, whereas those responding only to whisker deflections were located dorsolaterally. Responses were mediated by overlapping excitation and inhibition, with excitation onset preceding that of inhibition by several milliseconds. Responses differed according to the type of neuron, with direct pathway MSNs having larger responses and longer latencies between ipsilateral and contralateral responses than indirect pathway MSNs. Our results suggest that striatum acts as a sensory “hub” with specialized functional roles for the different neuron types.
    Neuron 09/2014; 83(5). DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.033 · 15.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Part of the explanation might be that the dye signal in vivo reflects synaptic activity at the mesoscopic scale, whereas the action potential recordings capture the activity of single neurons (Lippert et al., 2007; Eriksson et al., 2008). Nevertheless, in several studies one can follow how net increases in the synaptic activity propagate over the cortical areas when the cortex is perturbed by a sensory transient (Senseman, 1996; Prechtl et al., 1997; Senseman and Robbins, 2002; Slovin et al., 2002; Grinvald and Hildseheim, 2004; Roland et al., 2006; Ferezou et al., 2007; Lippert et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2007; Ahmed et al., 2008; Han et al., 2008; Takagaki et al., 2008; Yoshida et al., 2008; Harvey et al., 2009; Ayzenshtat et al., 2010; Meirovithz et al., 2010; Ng et al., 2010; Polack and Contreras, 2012; Harvey and Roland, 2013). This synaptic dynamics may show some order in the feed-forward propagation of net-excitation for example between V1 and V2 in monkeys, rats and turtles, between the barrel field and the motor cortex in the mouse, and between visual areas 17, 18 and 19, 21 in the ferret. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In principle, cortico-cortical communication dynamics is simple: neurons in one cortical area communicate by sending action potentials that release glutamate and excite their target neurons in other cortical areas. In practice, knowledge about cortico-cortical communication dynamics is minute. One reason is that no current technique can capture the fast spatio-temporal cortico-cortical evolution of action potential transmission and membrane conductances with sufficient spatial resolution. A combination of optogenetics and monosynaptic tracing with virus can reveal the spatio-temporal cortico-cortical dynamics of specific neurons and their targets, but does not reveal how the dynamics evolves under natural conditions. Spontaneous ongoing action potentials also spread across cortical areas and are difficult to separate from structured evoked and intrinsic brain activity such as thinking. At a certain state of evolution, the dynamics may engage larger populations of neurons to drive the brain to decisions, percepts and behaviors. For example, successfully evolving dynamics to sensory transients can appear at the mesoscopic scale revealing how the transient is perceived. As a consequence of these methodological and conceptual difficulties, studies in this field comprise a wide range of computational models, large-scale measurements (e.g., by MEG, EEG), and a combination of invasive measurements in animal experiments. Further obstacles and challenges of studying cortico-cortical communication dynamics are outlined in this critical review.
    Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 05/2014; 8:19. DOI:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00019
  • Source
    • "Among other functions, these waves are postulated to provide nonspecific background depolarization to neuronal assemblies, thus modulating the likelihood of action potential initiation within spatially segregated populations of cells [9,10]. Despite this proposed role of propagating waves in spatially coordinating neuronal computation [11-15], the mechanisms governing wave propagation remain an issue of ongoing debate [16]. In particular, little is known about how propagation dynamics are influenced by global network states [17]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Propagating waves of excitation have been observed extensively in the neocortex, during both spontaneous and sensory-evoked activity, and they play a critical role in spatially organizing information processing. However, the state-dependence of these spatiotemporal propagation patterns is largely unexplored. In this report, we use voltage-sensitive dye imaging in the rat visual cortex to study the propagation of spontaneous population activity in two discrete cortical states induced by urethane anesthesia. While laminar current source density patterns of spontaneous population events in these two states indicate a considerable degree of similarity in laminar networks, lateral propagation in the more active desynchronized state is approximately 20% faster than in the slower synchronized state. Furthermore, trajectories of wave propagation exhibit a strong anisotropy, but the preferred direction is different depending on cortical state. Our results show that horizontal wave propagation of spontaneous neural activity is largely dependent on the global activity states of local cortical circuits.
    BMC Neuroscience 07/2013; 14(1):78. DOI:10.1186/1471-2202-14-78 · 2.67 Impact Factor
Show more