Food insecurity, malnutrition and mortality in Maewo and Ambae islands, Vanuatu.

World Vision, Australia.
Pacific health dialog: a publication of the Pacific Basin Officers Training Program and the Fiji School of Medicine 04/2004; 11(1):12-21. DOI: 10.1079/PHN2005902
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study reports on findings from the ex post evaluation of the Maewo Capacity Building project in Vanuatu which was funded by World Vision Australia. The objective of the evaluation was to examine the extent to which the infrastructure and systems left behind by the project contributed to the improvement of household food security, and health and nutritional outcomes in Maewo island, using Ambae island as a comparator The household food security of 817 households selected by a two stage cluster sampling method was assessed using a modified version of the Radimer-Comell hunger scale and the US National Measure of food security. Anthropometric measurement in children (6-59 months) and mortality data were also obtained. The prevalence of food insecurity without hunger was estimated at 15.3% (95%CI: 12.1% to 19.2%) in Maewo versus 38.2% (95%CI: 33.6% to 43.0%) in Ambae while food insecurity with hunger in children did not vary by location. After controlling for age, gender and household food security status, children aged 6-59 months in Maewo were less likely to be underweight than children of the same age in Ambae (OR: 0.66, 95%CI 0.38 to 0.99). No difference was detected between the two locations in terms of stunting and wasting prevalence. The crude mortality rate (CMR) was lower in Maewo (CTvIIR=0.47/10,000/day, 95%CI: 0.39 to 0.55) than Ambae (CMR= 0.59/10,000/day, 95%CI: 0.51 to 0.67) but no difference existed in mortality in children under five years old. The major causes of death were similar in both locations and the causes frequently reported were malaria, acute respiratory infection and dianheal diseases. The evaluation found that Maewo had better health and nutrition outcomes but the infrastructure left behind by the project and the livelihood system may have been weakened by cyclone Ivy that devastated the region from 25 to 27 February 2004.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To conduct a systematic review aimed at identifying and characterizing the experience-based household food security scales and to synthesize their psychometric properties.Design Search in the MEDLINE, LILACS and SciELO databases, using the descriptors (‘food insecurity’ OR ‘food security’) AND (‘questionnaires’ OR ‘scales’ OR ‘validity’ OR ‘reliability’). There was no limitation on the period of publication. All articles had their titles and abstracts analysed by two reviewers. The studies of interest were read in their entirety and the relevant information extracted using a standard form.Results The initial bibliographic search identified 299 articles. Of these, the 159 that seemed to meet the criteria for inclusion were read fully. After consultation of the bibliographic references of these articles, twenty articles and five documents were added, as they satisfied the previously determined criteria for inclusion. Twenty-four different instruments were identified; all were brief and of easy application. The majority were devised in the USA. Forty-seven references reported results of psychometric studies. The instruments that presented the highest number of psychometric studies were the Core Food Security Measurement/Household Food Security Survey Module (CFSM/HFSSM) and the Self-Perceived Household Food Security Scale.Conclusions There are a number of structured scales available in the literature for characterization of household food insecurity. However, despite some psychometric studies already existing about the majority of the instruments, it is observed that, except for the studies of the CFSM/HFSSM, these are still restricted to appraisal of a few aspects of reliability and validity.
    Public Health Nutrition 06/2014; 18(05):1-16. DOI:10.1017/S1368980014001050 · 2.48 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to examine cost disparity and nutritional choices within the City of Yarra (Yarra), targeting three suburbs that have low- and high-rise estates: Richmond, Fitzroy, and Collingwood. The healthy food basket (HFB) was modeled on the Queensland Healthy Food Access Basket for a six-person family for a fortnight and was constructed to include food items that are common to ethnic groups living in Yarra. The HFB food item costs were sampled across 29 food outlets in Yarra. The average cost of HFB per fortnight for a family of six was significantly lower in Richmond (Mean = $419.26) than in Collingwood (Mean = $519.28) and in Fitzroy (Mean = $433.98). While costs for cereal groups, dairy, meats and alternatives, and non-core were comparable across the suburbs, significant differences were noticed for fruit, legumes and vegetables. Geographic location alone explained 54% of the variance in HFB price (F2,26 = 15.23, p < 0.001) and 32.7% in the variance of fruit, vegetable and legumes (F2,26 = 7.72, p < 0.001). The effect of geographic location remained consistent after controlling for the type of food outlets. The type of food outlets had a non-significant effect on the variance of prices. Richmond had a greater number variety of fruit, vegetables, and legumes (F2, 26 = 5.7, p < 0.01) and an overall lower number of missing items (F2, 26 = 3.9, p < 0.05) than Collingwood and Fitzroy. The diversity of food available in the three suburbs was more likely to reflect the Vietnamese, Chinese and East-Timorese shopping pattern than the rest of other ethnic groups. These findings indicate that there is inequality in food access in terms of cost and availability in Yarra and such inequality is function of location and not the type of food outlets. The differential economic access to a HFB in Yarra could be addressed using a multi-faceted approach, including implementing policies that encourage diversity of food outlets and putting in place incentive-based policies to encourage the consumption of fruit, vegetables and legumes, and taking actions toward promoting supply of ethnic foods.
    Ecology of Food and Nutrition 02/2008; 47(1):44-63. DOI:10.1080/03670240701454725 · 0.78 Impact Factor
  • Source

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 1, 2014