Article

Results following surgical resection for malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. A single institutional experience.

Department of HPB and Transplantation, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
JOP: Journal of the pancreas 01/2008; 9(1):19-25.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of the study was to present clinical outcomes of patients with malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NET) following surgical resection with curative intent. Clinical and pathological factors that influenced the outcomes were also analysed.
Retrospective case note study.
All patients with pancreatic NET that underwent surgery over a 7-year period (1999-2006).
Twelve patients were identified with a median age at diagnosis of 54 years (range: 24-79 years). Common presenting symptoms include abdominal pain (n=8) and weight loss (n=3). Overall morbidity was 25% with one post-operative death. The median follow-up period was 41 months (range: 9-156 months). The overall 2- and 5-year actuarial survival rates were 88% and 70%, respectively. The overall survival was better in patients treated with surgery compared to patients managed medically (P<0.001). The disease-free survival rates were 62% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Recurrent disease occurred in four patients and the median disease-free interval was 6 months (range: 3-14 months). On univariate analysis, angio-invasion (P=0.015) and degree of differentiation (P=0.024) were associated with developing recurrent disease.
Surgical resection of malignant pancreatic NET results in good long-term survival in selected patients.

0 Followers
 · 
202 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The outcomes of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are extremely diverse, and determining the best strategy, optimal timing of therapy and the therapeutic results depend on understanding prognostic factors. We determined the clinical, radiological and histological factors associated with survival and tumor recurrence for patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology 06/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2014.06.004 · 2.89 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: HYPOTHESIS Lymph node metastases decrease survival in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). DESIGN Prospective database searches. SETTING National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Stanford University Hospital (SUH). PATIENTS A total of 326 patients underwent surgical exploration for pNETs at the NIH (n = 216) and SUH (n = 110). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Overall survival, disease-related survival, and time to development of liver metastases. RESULTS Forty patients (12.3%) underwent enucleation and 305 (93.6%) underwent resection. Of the patients who underwent resection, 117 (35.9%) had partial pancreatectomy and 30 (9.2%) had a Whipple procedure. Forty-one patients also had liver resections, 21 had wedge resections, and 20 had lobectomies. Mean follow-up was 8.1 years (range, 0.3-28.6 years). The 10-year overall survival for patients with no metastases or lymph node metastases only was similar at 80%. As expected, patients with liver metastases had a significantly decreased 10-year survival of 30% (P < .001). The time to development of liver metastases was significantly reduced for patients with lymph node metastases alone compared with those with none (P < .001). For the NIH cohort with longer follow-up, disease-related survival was significantly different for those patients with no metastases, lymph node metastases alone, and liver metastases (P < .001). Extent of lymph node involvement in this subgroup showed that disease-related survival decreased as a function of the number of lymph nodes involved (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS As expected, liver metastases decrease survival of patients with pNETs. Patients with lymph node metastases alone have a shorter time to the development of liver metastases that is dependent on the number of lymph nodes involved. With sufficient long-term follow-up, lymph node metastases decrease disease-related survival. Careful evaluation of number and extent of lymph node involvement is warranted in all surgical procedures for pNETs.
    Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill.: 1960) 09/2012; 147(9):820-7. DOI:10.1001/archsurg.2012.1261 · 4.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sporadic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) are increasingly diagnosed as incidentalomas, and their resection is usually recommended. The prognostic significance of this diagnosis feature is poorly studied, and management of these tumors remains controversial. Clinical, pathologic characteristics and outcome of resected incidentally diagnosed NF-PNET (Inc) were compared with resected symptomatic NF-PNET (Symp) to better assess their biologic behavior and tailor their management. From 1994 to 2010, 108 patients underwent resection for sporadic nonmetastatic NF-PNET. Diagnosis was considered as incidental in patients with no abdominal symptoms or symptoms unlikely to be related to tumor mass. Patients with Inc were compared with patients with Symp, regarding demographics, postoperative course, pathology, and disease-free survival (DFS). Of the 108 patients, 65 (61%) had incidentally diagnosed tumors. Pancreas-sparing pancreatectomies (enucleation/central pancreatectomy) were performed more frequently in Inc (62% vs 30%, P = .001). Inc tumors were more frequently <20 mm (65% vs 42%, P = .019), staged T1 (62% vs 33%, P = .0001), node negative (85% vs 60%; P = .005), and grade 1 (66% vs 33%, P = .0001). One postoperative death occurred in the Inc group, and postoperative morbidity was similar between the two groups (60% vs 65%, P = .59). DFS was substantially better in the Inc group (5-year DFS = 92% vs 82%, P = .0016). Incidentally diagnosed NF-PNETs are associated with less aggressive features compared with symptomatic lesions but cannot always be considered to be benign. Operative resection remains recommended for most. Incidentally diagnosed NF-PNET may be good candidates for pancreas-sparing pancreatectomies.
    Surgery 11/2013; 155(1). DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2013.08.007 · 3.11 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from