Article

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy: pathogenetic mechanisms and link to dense amyloid plaques.

Neurodegenerative Brain Diseases Group, VIB Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Genes Brain and Behavior (Impact Factor: 3.6). 03/2008; 7 Suppl 1:67-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2007.00380.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) of the amyloid-beta (Abeta) type is the most common form of sporadic CAA and is now also accepted as an early and integral part of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy is a risk factor for haemorrhagic stroke and is believed to independently contribute to dementia. Rare forms of hereditary cerebral amyloidosis caused by mutations within the Abeta domain of amyloid precursor protein (APP) have been identified, where mutant Abeta preferably deposits in vessels because of a decreased fibrillogenic potential and/or increased vasotopicity. A review of factors involved in CAA caused by wild-type Abeta suggests that increased Abeta levels in brain without an increased Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio is one of the most important prerequisites for vascular amyloidosis. This is exemplified by CAA observed in APP duplication and Down's syndrome patients, neprilysin polymorphism patients and knockout mice and Swedish APP (KM670/671NL) mice. Select presenilin mutations also lead to a prominent CAA, and importantly, presenilin mutations are shown to have varied effects on the production of Abeta40, the predominant amyloid found in CAA. Conversely, APP mutations such as Austrian APP (T714I) drastically decrease Abeta40 production and are deficient in CAA. Apolipoprotein E-epsilon4 is also shown to be a risk factor for CAA, and this might be because of its specific role in the aggregation of Abeta40. Recent data also suggest that dense-core senile plaques in humans and dense plaques in transgenic mice, composed predominantly of Abeta40, associate with vessels. This review highlights some of these aspects of genetics and biochemistry of CAA and pathological descriptions linked to a prominent CAA and/or dense plaques in humans and relevant mouse models and discusses how this knowledge has led to a better understanding of the processes involved in vascular amyloidosis, and in causing dementia, and thus has important therapeutic implications.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
89 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Amyloid-beta peptide (Aβ)-directed active and passive immunization therapeutic strategies reduce brain levels of Aβ, decrease the severity of beta-amyloid plaque pathology and reverse cognitive deficits in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease (AD). As an alternative approach to passive immunization with full IgG molecules, single-chain variable fragment (scFv) antibodies can modulate or neutralize Aβ-related neurotoxicity and inhibit its aggregation in vitro. In this study, we characterized a scFv derived from a full IgG antibody raised against the C-terminus of Aβ, and studied its passage into the brains of APP transgenic mice, as well as its potential to reduce Aβ-related pathology. We found that the scFv entered the brain after intranasal application, and that it bound to beta-amyloid plaques in the cortex and hippocampus of APP transgenic mice. Moreover, the scFv inhibited Aβ fibril formation and Aβ-mediated neurotoxicity in vitro. In a preventative therapeutic approach chronic intranasal treatment with scFv reduced congophilic amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and beta-amyloid plaque numbers in the cortex of APPswe/PS1dE9 mice. This reduction of CAA and plaque pathology was associated with a redistribution of brain Aβ from the insoluble fraction to the soluble peptide pool. Due to their lack of the effector domain of full IgG, scFv may represent an alternative tool for the treatment of Aβ-related pathology without triggering Fc-mediated effector functions. Additionally, our observations support the possibility that Aβ-directed immunotherapy can reduce Aβ deposition in brain vessels in transgenic mice.
    PLoS ONE 04/2011; 6(4). · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • Folia Neuropathologica 01/2013; 3:169-188. · 1.67 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since the original publication describing the illness in 1907, the genetic understanding of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has advanced such that it is now clear that it is a genetically heterogeneous condition, the subtypes of which may not uniformly respond to a given intervention. It is therefore critical to characterize the clinical and preclinical stages of AD subtypes, including the rare autosomal dominant forms caused by known mutations in the PSEN1, APP, and PSEN2 genes that are being studied in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network study and its associated secondary prevention trial. Similar efforts are occurring in an extended Colombian family with a PSEN1 mutation, in APOE ε4 homozygotes, and in Down syndrome. Despite commonalities in the mechanisms producing the AD phenotype, there are also differences that reflect specific genetic origins. Treatment modalities should be chosen and trials designed with these differences in mind. Ideally, the varying pathological cascades involved in the different subtypes of AD should be defined so that both areas of overlap and of distinct differences can be taken into account. At the very least, clinical trials should determine the influence of known genetic factors in post hoc analyses.
    Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 11/2014; 14(11):499. · 3.67 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
0 Downloads