Article

PTSD and traumatic brain injury: folklore and fact?

Community Head Injury Service, The Camborne Centre, Bedgrove, Aylesbury, Bucks, UK.
Brain Injury (Impact Factor: 1.86). 02/2008; 22(1):1-5. DOI: 10.1080/02699050701829696
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A number of controversies and debates have arisen over the years surrounding the dual diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI). Many of these have centred around the around the degree of protection provided by TBI against developing the disorder. The following is brief review of the literature in this area to help resolve some of these issues and to address a number of specific challenges which arise when working with this patient group.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
102 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Explosive devices have been the most frequent cause of traumatic brain injury (TBI) among deployed contemporary U.S. service members. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of prior cumulative blast exposures (that did or did not result in TBI) on later postconcussion and posttraumatic symptom reporting after sustaining a mild TBI (MTBI). Participants were 573 service members who sustained MTBI divided into four groups by number of blast exposures (1, 2, 3 and 4-10) and a non-blast control group. Postconcussion symptoms were measured using the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) and PTSD symptoms using the Posttraumatic Checklist-Civilian version (PCL-C). Results show groups significantly differed on total NSI scores (p<.001), where symptom endorsement increased as number of reported blast exposures increased. Total NSI scores were significantly higher for the 3- and 4-10 blast groups compared to the 1- and 2-blast groups with effect sizes ranging from small to moderate (d = .31 to .63). After controlling for PTSD symptoms using the PCL-C total score, NSI total score differences remained between the 4-10-Blast group and the 1- and 2-Blast groups, but were less pronounced (d=.35 and d=.24, respectively). Analyses of NSI subscale scores using PCL-C scores as a covariate revealed significant between-blast group differences on cognitive, sensory and somatic, but not affective symptoms. Regression analyses revealed that cumulative blast exposures accounted for a small but significant amount of the variance in total NSI scores (4.8%; p=.009) and total PCL-C scores (2.3%; p<.001). In conclusion, among service members exposed to blast, postconcussion symptom reporting increased as a function of cumulative blast exposures. Future research will need to determine the relationship between cumulative blast exposures, symptom reporting and neuropathological changes.
    Journal of Neurotrauma 07/2014; · 3.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are signature injuries of the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts. The conditions can be comorbid and have overlapping signs and symptoms, making it difficult to diagnose and treat each. TBI is associated with numerous changes in vision function, but vision problems secondary to PTSD have not been documented. To address this shortcoming, we reviewed the medical records of 100 patients with a history of TBI, noting PTSD diagnoses, visual symptoms, vision func-tion abnormalities, and medications with visual side effects. Forty-one patients had PTSD and 59 did not. High rates of bin-ocular vision and oculomotor function deficits were measured in patients with a history of TBI, but no significant differences between patients with or without PTSD were evident. How-ever, compared to patients without PTSD, patients with PTSD had more self-reported visual symptoms in all four assessments and the complaint rates were significantly higher for light sen-sitivity and reading problems. Together, these findings may be beneficial in understanding vision problems in patients with TBI and PTSD as comorbid conditions compared with those with TBI alone.
    The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 09/2014; 51(4):547-558. · 1.69 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this review is to survey the use of experimental animal models for studying the chronic histopathological and behavioral consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The strategies employed to study the long-term consequences of TBI are described, along with a summary of the evidence available to date from common experimental TBI models: fluid percussion injury (FPI), controlled cortical impact (CCI), blast TBI (bTBI), and closed head injury (CHI). For each model, evidence is organized according to outcome. The histopathological outcomes included are gross changes in morphology/histology, ventricular enlargement, gray/white matter shrinkage, axonal injury, cerebrovascular histopathology, inflammation, and neurogenesis. The behavioral outcomes included are overall neurological function, motor function, cognitive function, frontal lobe function, and stress-related outcomes. A brief discussion is provided comparing the most common experimental models of TBI and highlighting the utility of each model in understanding specific aspects of TBI pathology. The majority of experimental TBI studies collect data in the acute post-injury period but few continue into the chronic period. Available evidence from long-term experimental studies suggests that many of the experimental TBI models can lead to progressive changes in histopathology and behavior. These studies described in this review contribute to our understanding of chronic TBI pathology.
    Journal of Neurotrauma 12/2014; · 3.97 Impact Factor