Experimental validation of circumferential, longitudinal, and radial 2-dimensional strain during dobutamine stress echocardiography in ischemic conditions.

INSERM U828 and IFR4, University of Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, France.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Impact Factor: 15.34). 01/2008; 51(2):149-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.088
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to assess and validate 2-dimensional (2D) strain for the detection of ischemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE).
Evaluation of abnormalities of left ventricular (LV) function from wall thickening during DSE is unsatisfactory and requires a high level of expertise.
In 10 open-chest anesthetized pigs, myocardial deformation was studied before and during dobutamine infusion, under control and ischemic conditions produced by various degrees of coronary artery constriction: 2 of nonflow-limiting stenoses (NFLS) of increasing severity reducing left anterior descending artery hyperemic flow by 40% and 70% and 2 flow-limiting stenoses (FLS) reducing resting coronary flow by 25% and 50%. Agreement between 2D strain echocardiography and sonomicrometry (reference method) was evaluated by linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis.
Good correlation and agreement were observed between 2-dimensional strain and sonomicrometry at rest and during dobutamine infusion; longitudinal strain: r = 0.77, p < 0.001 and r = 0.80, p < 0.001; radial strain: r = 0.57, p < 0.05 and r = 0.63, p < 0.05; and circumferential strain: r = 0.74, p < 0.001 and r = 0.58, p < 0.001. Circumferential and longitudinal strains in the risk area were significantly decreased at rest in the presence of FLS and during dobutamine infusion in the presence of NFLS. By contrast, radial strain was significantly decreased in the presence of severe FLS only during dobutamine infusion.
The 2D strain provides accurate assessment of LV regional function. Evaluation of circumferential and longitudinal strains during DSE has real potential for quantitative evaluation of LV deformation in the routine assessment of ischemia.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the availability of multiple solutions for assessing myocardial strain, little is currently known about the relative performance of the different methods. In this study, we sought to contrast two popular strain estimation techniques directly (block-matching and registration) in an in-vivo setting by comparing both to a gold standard reference measurement. Mid short-axis images were acquired with a GE Vivid7 ultrasound system in five open-chest sheep instrumented with ultrasonic microcrystals. Radial (∈RR) and circumferential strain (∈CC) were estimated during four stages: at rest, during esmolol and dobutamine infusion, and during acute ischemia. While the correlations of a well-validated block matching approach and the elastic registration method were comparable for the ∈CC component (0.82 vs 0.81 respectively), imposing regularization during the motion estimation process (i.e. as embedded in the elastic registration method), showed to be advantageous to estimate ∈RR as it improved performance significantly (0.63 vs 0.83; p=0.05). Moreover, the bias and the limits of agreement were also smaller in this direction (p
    Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2011 IEEE International; 01/2011
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2DSTE) has been used widely in research, but rarely in clinical practice because data acquisition and analysis are time-consuming. By reducing the acquisition and analysis time, 3-dimensional STE may improve clinical impact. We investigated the feasibility of 3DSTE myocardial deformation, with comparison to 2DSTE.
    International Journal of Cardiology 07/2014; · 6.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Quantitative analysis of wall motion from three-dimensional (3D) dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) could provide additional diagnostic information not available from qualitative analysis. In this study, we compare the effectiveness of 3D fractional shortening (3DFS), a measure of wall motion computed from 3D echocardiography (3DE), to strain and strain rate measured with sonomicrometry for detecting critical stenoses during DSE.Methods Eleven open-chest dogs underwent DSE both with and without a critical stenosis. 3DFS was measured from 3DE images acquired at peak stress. 3DFS was normalized by subtracting average 3DFS during control peak stress (∆3DFS). Strains in the perfusion defect (PD) were measured from sonomicrometry, and PD size and location were measured with microspheres.ResultsA ∆3DFS abnormality indicated the presence of a critical stenosis with high sensitivity and specificity (88% and 100%, respectively), and ∆3DFS abnormality size correlated with PD size (R2 = 0.54). The sensitivity and specificity for ∆3DFS were similar to that for area strain (88%, 100%) and circumferential strain and strain rate (88%, 92% and 88%, 86%, respectively), while longitudinal strain and strain rate were less specific. ∆3DFS correlated significantly with both coronary flow reserve (R2 = 0.71) and PD size (R2 = 0.97), while area strain correlated with PD size only (R2 = 0.67), and other measures were not significantly correlated with flow reserve or PD size.Conclusion Quantitative wall-motion analysis using ∆3DFS is effective for detecting critical stenoses during DSE, performing similar to 3D strain, and provides potentially useful information on the size and location of a perfusion defect.
    Echocardiography 05/2014; · 1.26 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jul 22, 2014