Article

Are general practitioners satisfied with electronic discharge summaries?

Balmain Hospital, Balmain NSW 2041.
The HIM journal (Impact Factor: 0.7). 02/2007; 36(1):7-12.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to assess general practitioners' (GPs') satisfaction with the quality of information in electronic discharge summaries and the timeliness of their receipt of the summaries. The study was conducted in a 75-bed Australian public metropolitan hospital which uses an electronic discharge summary which is mailed to the patients' nominated GP. Eighty-five GPs were surveyed regarding their satisfaction with the content of the electronic discharge summary and the timeliness of receipt. the majority of respondents indicated that they had received the electronic discharge summary within two weeks of the patients' discharge from hospital. The majority also indicated that they were satisfied with all eight documentation data elements. Some GPs indicated that they would prefer to receive the electronic discharge summary electronically by email rather than by conventional mail, and that they would like more information in the "follow-up and recommendations" content areas of the summary. It was concluded that the majority of GPs agreed that the electronic discharge summary was an improvement over the manual discharge summary. Further developments in the safe and secure electronic transfer of discharge summary information needs to be addressed to meet the information needs of GPs.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Joanne Callen, Mar 16, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
168 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the effectiveness of delivering of computer-generated discharge summaries to general practice by email, fax, post and patient hand delivery. Blinded, randomized controlled trial. A pre-study audit ascertaining baseline statistics and a follow-up survey were conducted with general practice to determine preferred medium for receiving discharge communication. 196 geriatric patients who were admitted to the aged care ward of a 300-bed metropolitan teaching hospital. Twenty-eight patients were lost to follow-up and 52 general practices participated in the final survey. The pre-study audit followed 63 discharges from the same ward. 168 eligible patients were randomly assigned to have their electronic discharge summary sent by email (n=40), fax (n=48), post (n=40) or patient hand delivery (n=40). Receipt of discharge summary by the general practice clinic within 7 days of patient discharge from hospital. The receipt rates for email (73.9%, n=17) and fax were comparable (69.4%, n=25; chi(2)=0.137, df=1, P=0.712), and significantly higher (chi(2)=19.86, df=3, P<0.0002) than post (43.8%, n=14) and patient hand delivery (24.2%, n=8). General practices indicated that fax was the most preferred method (82.7%) for communication of discharge summaries. The majority of general practices (75.0%) utilized an electronic system for storage of patient information while 88.5% of practices reported using medical prescribing software. Transmission of computer-generated discharge summaries by fax or email offers the most effective method of communicating with primary care physicians, as long as accurate contact information is available. Although fax is still the most preferred, email has many advantages that could potentially allow it to replace fax as a standard mode for delivery of discharge communication.
    International Journal of Medical Informatics 03/2010; 79(3):167-72. DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.12.006 · 2.72 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Queensland Health is implementing a state-wide system to electronically generate and distribute discharge summaries. Previously, general practitioners (GPs) have indicated that the quality of the discharge summary does not support clinical handover. While the electronic system will address some issues (e.g. legibility and timeliness), the quality of the discharge summary content is predominantly independent of method of generation. As discharge summaries are usually generated by interns, we proposed that improvement in the quality of the summary may be achieved through education. This project aimed to compare the perceptions of hospital-based consultant educators and recipient GPs regarding discharge summary content and quality. The discharge summary and audit tool were sent to the recipient GP (n=134) and a hospital consultant (n=14) for satisfaction rating, using a 5- point Likert scale for questions relating to diagnosis, the listing of clinical management, medication, pathology, investigations, and recommendations to GP. Sampling was performed by selecting up to 10 discharge summaries completed by each first-year intern (n=36) in 2009, during the second, third and fourth rotations at the Townsville Hospital until a total of 403 was reached. Matched responses were compared using the Kappa statistic. The response rate was 93% (n=375) and 63% (n=254) for consultants and GPs respectively. Results from this study demonstrated that GPs were more satisfied with discharge summaries than were consultants. An anomaly occurred in three questions where, despite the majority of GPs rating satisfied or very satisfied, a small but proportionally greater number of GPs were very dissatisfied when compared with consultants. Poor or fair agreement between GPs and consultants was demonstrated in medications, pathology results, investigations and recommendations to GP, with GPs rating higher satisfaction in all questions. Lower consultant satisfaction ratings compared with GP ratings suggest that consultants can evaluate discharge summary content to the level required by GPs for clinical handover. Therefore, consultants can appropriately educate interns on discharge summary content for GP needs.
    The HIM journal 01/2010; 39(3):7-15. · 0.70 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medication management (MM) is a process used to ensure safe usage of medications, describing many tasks performed by groups of healthcare practitioners, including: processing large amounts of data, decision making; and coordination of involved professionals. The process poses risks for patient safety, many of which are serious. One way to enhance safety is by utilisation of IT to support various aspects of the process. However, despite the consensus about IT’s positive influence on the safety of healthcare process in general, and MM in particular, successful implementation of IT in healthcare remains challenged by many factors, including social factors. This paper outlines the MM process and illustrates some IT tools used to support tasks of the process. It further describes limitations and implementation challenges of these IT tools. Finally, the article discusses social challenges and some approaches to address them.
    IADIS International e-Health Conference; 06/2009