Article

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Medical and Dental Health, Access to Care, and Use of Services in US Children

Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 5.3). 02/2008; 121(2):e286-98. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-1243
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Not enough is known about the national prevalence of racial/ethnic disparities in children's medical and dental care.
The purpose of this work was to examine racial/ethnic disparities in medical and oral health, access to care, and use of services in a national sample.
The National Survey of Children's Health was a telephone survey in 2003-2004 of a national random sample of parents and guardians of 102,353 children 0 to 17 years old. Disparities in selected medical and oral health and health care measures were examined for white, African American, Latino, Asian/Pacific Islander, Native American, and multiracial children. Multivariate analyses were performed to adjust for primary language at home, age, insurance coverage, income, parental education and employment, and number of children and adults in the household. Forty measures of medical and oral health status, access to care, and use of services were analyzed.
Many significant disparities were noted; for example, uninsurance rates were 6% for whites, 21% for Latinos, 15% for Native Americans, 7% for African Americans, and 4% for Asians or Pacific Islanders, and the proportions with a usual source of care were as follows: whites, 90%; Native Americans, 61%; Latinos, 68%; African Americans, 77%; and Asians or Pacific Islanders, 87%. Many disparities persisted for > or = 1 minority group in multivariate analyses, including increased odds of suboptimal health status, overweight, asthma, activity limitations, behavioral and speech problems, emotional difficulties, uninsurance, suboptimal dental health, no usual source of care, unmet medical and dental needs, transportation barriers to care, problems getting specialty care, no medical or dental visit in the past year, emergency department visits, not receiving mental health care, and not receiving prescription medications. Certain disparities were particularly marked for specific racial/ethnic groups: for Latinos, suboptimal health status and teeth condition, uninsurance, and problems getting specialty care; for African Americans, asthma, behavior problems, skin allergies, speech problems, and unmet prescription needs; for Native Americans, hearing or vision problems, no usual source of care, emergency department visits, and unmet medical and dental needs; and for Asians or Pacific Islanders, problems getting specialty care and not seeing a doctor in the past year. Multiracial children also experienced many disparities. CONCLUSIONS; Minority children experience multiple disparities in medical and oral health, access to care, and use of services. Certain disparities are particularly marked for specific racial/ethnic groups, and multiracial children experience many disparities.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Glenn Flores, Aug 01, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
152 Views
  • Source
    • "Although the prevalence of diagnosable mental disorders, such as major depression and dysthymia, has not always been found to be higher in minorities compared to non-minorities, certain studies have documented elevated depressive symptoms rates and higher risk of persistent mental health disorders among minorities (see Anderson and Mayes 2010; Breslau et al. 2006; Kessler et al. 2005, 2012). Disparities for these groups also include poorer access, utilization, and quality of mental health services (Alexandre et al. 2010; Flores and Tomany-Korman 2008). Differential suicide rates, such as higher rates among Native Americans, also suggest mental health disparities (Karch et al. 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Certain subgroups of youth are at high risk for depression and elevated depressive symptoms, and experience limited access to quality mental health care. Examples are socioeconomically disadvantaged, racial/ ethnic minority, and sexual minority youth. Research shows that there are efficacious interventions to prevent youth depression and depressive symptoms. These preventive interventions have the potential to play a key role in addressing these mental health disparities by reducing youth risk factors and enhancing protective factors. However, there are comparatively few preventive interventions directed specifically to these vulnerable subgroups, and sample sizes of diverse subgroups in general prevention trials are often too low to assess whether preventive interventions work equally well for vulnerable youth compared to other youth. In this paper, we describe the importance and need for "scientific equity," or equality and fairness in the amount of scientific knowledge produced to understand the potential solutions to such health disparities. We highlight possible strategies for promoting scientific equity, including the following: increasing the number of prevention research participants from vulnerable subgroups, conducting more data synthesis analyses and implementation science research, disseminating preventive interventions that are efficacious for vulnerable youth, and increasing the diversity of the prevention science research workforce. These strategies can increase the availability of research evidence to determine the degree to which preventive interventions can help address mental health disparities. Although this paper utilizes the prevention of youth depression as an illustrative case example, the concepts are applicable to other health outcomes for which there are disparities, such as substance use and obesity.
    Prevention Science 10/2014; 16(5). DOI:10.1007/s11121-014-0518-7 · 2.63 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Concerns about racial discrimination, genetic discrimination (Peters et al. 2004), and misuses of genetic testing (Bates et al. 2005; Zimmerman et al. 2006) are prevalent in minority populations, potentially impacting the use of clinical genetic services (Armstrong et al. 2003) and participation in genetics research (Bussey-Jones et al. 2010; Corbie-Smith et al. 1999). Distrust from minority populations likely stems from a combination of past mistreatment of minorities by the medical community (Gamble 1997) as well as continuing feelings of underlying racism (Gamble 1997; Jacobs et al. 2006) and limited access to healthcare services (Flores and Tomany- Korman 2008; Joshi et al. 2012; Mahmoudi and Jensen 2012). Despite the lower level of trust reported by participants in the online arm, these participants would still prefer to review results online for future testing, but with the option to speak with a healthcare professional if needed. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patient trust in personal medical information is critical to increasing adherence to physician recommendations and medications. One of the anticipated benefits of learning of one's genomic risk for common diseases is the increased adoption of screening, preventive care and lifestyle changes. However, the equivocal results thus far reported of the positive impact of knowledge of genomic risk on behavior change may be due to lack of patients' trust in the results. As part of a clinical study to compare two methods of communication of genomic risk results for Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), we assessed patients' trust and preferred methods of delivery of genomic risk information. A total of 300 participants recruited from the general public in Durham, NC were randomized to receive their genomic risk for T2DM in-person from a genetic counselor or online through the testing company's web-site. Participants completed a baseline survey and three follow-up surveys after receiving results. Overall, participants reported high levels of trust in the test results. Participants who received their results in-person from the genetic counselor were significantly more likely to trust their results than those who reviewed their results on-line (p = 0.005). There was not a statistically significant difference in levels of trust among participants with increased genetic risk, as compared to other those with decreased or same as population risk (p = 0.1154). In the event they undergo genomic risk testing again, 55 % of participants overall indicated they would prefer to receive their results online compared to 28 % that would prefer to receive future results in-person. Of those participants preferring to receive results online, 77 % indicated they would prefer to have the option to speak to someone if they had questions with the online results (compared to accessing results online without the option of professional consultation). This is the first study to assess satisfaction with genomic risk testing by the method of delivery of the test result. The higher rate of trust in results delivered in-person suggests that online access reports may not result in serious consideration of results and lack of adoption of recommended preventive recommendations.
    Journal of Genetic Counseling 06/2013; 23(3). DOI:10.1007/s10897-013-9674-3 · 1.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In particular, healthcare disparities between African Americans and whites have been persistent [3]. Disparities for African Americans have also been noted in other areas including: higher uninsured rates, lower proportions of a usual source of care, and higher unmet prescription needs [4]. Such disparities have been noted for the country as a whole, but there are specific differences for African Americans across states as well. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study analyzed Virginia data from the most recent National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs. Logistic regression models were run for six Maternal and Child Health Bureau core outcomes and included demographics, child characteristics, health care providers, and health care access variables as predictors. Race/ethnicity disparities were judged to be present if the race/ethnicity variable was a significant predictor in the final model. Examining the components of disparate outcomes, African American children were found to be less likely than their white counterparts to have a usual source for sick and preventive care and to have a personal doctor or nurse. Their parents were less likely to say that doctors spent enough time, listened carefully, were sensitive to values and customs, and made them feel like a partner. These findings emphasize the need to examine health care disparities at a state level in order to guide efforts at remediation.
    09/2011; 2011:273938. DOI:10.5402/2011/273938
Show more