Reducing stigma by meeting and learning from people with mental illness

Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, University of Medicine and Dentistry, Scotch Plains, New Jersey 07076, USA.
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal (Impact Factor: 1.16). 02/2008; 31(3):186-93. DOI: 10.2975/31.3.2008.186.193
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study examines the effects of a public education program, developed in large part by consumers of mental health services, on the attitudes of high school students toward people with mental illnesses.
Four hundred and twenty-six students were provided an informational session delivered by consumers and a faculty member from the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ). The content of these sessions included facts about mental illness, characteristic symptoms, recovery strategies, and personal stories told by the consumer presenters. The students' attitudes were assessed pre- and post-session using the Attribution Questionnaire-Short Form for Children. Independent samples t-tests were used to assess changes in attitudes from pre- to post-assessment.
After viewing these presentations, students reported less stigmatizing views toward people with mental illness on seven of the nine factors and the total scale score.
A 1-hour informational session developed and facilitated by consumers of mental health services can significantly affect the attitudes of adolescents toward people with major mental illnesses. Future studies will evaluate the sustainability of attitude changes as the result of these presentations, as well as the effects of demographic and socioeconomic differences on attitude change.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examined the effectiveness of an intervention to reduce explicit and implicit stigma-relevant attitudes toward mental illness and treatment-seeking and behavioural indicators of willingness to seek treatment. Adolescents were randomly assigned to the experimental (education about mental illness and treatment involving psychoeducation and contact (via DVD) with an affected individual) or control intervention (education about tobacco). Findings suggest the stigma intervention was effective at reducing explicit but not implicit stigma-relevant attitudes. As hypothesized, participants receiving the experimental intervention reported less explicit stigma toward treatment and greater openness to personally seek treatment if they had also reported prior mental health treatment. These findings support the potential for a brief educational intervention among adolescents to reduce negative attitudes toward mental health treatment, but raise questions about how to effectively address implicit stigma as well as the importance of translating stigma reduction into behavior changes.
    01/2011; 1(2):9-21.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The diversity perceptions of human service professionals may be critical indicators of effective service provision. Specifically, this study explored the disability perceptions of counselors, rehabilitation providers, and teachers (N = 172) enrolled in a large, southeastern university. A 76% response rate was achieved in the study, indicating clear differences by human service providers' preparation area and perceptions of disability type. Implications for preparation and future research are discussed.
    Journal of counseling and development: JCD 04/2011; 89(2). DOI:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00076.x · 0.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is an evidence-based practice for individuals living with serious mental illnesses. Although studies estimate that at least half of people with serious mental illnesses are parents, little is known about ACT policies and services for parent consumers. Method: Seventy-three ACT providers from 67 teams completed a survey about treatment services for parent consumers. Teams were divided into "parent-sensitive" and "nonsensitive" teams based on 3 indicators of parent-related services: identifying parental status, discussing parenting issues, and assisting with parenting needs. For each treatment indicator, teams were compared to determine factors that may contribute to parent-supportive services. Results: Providers from parent-sensitive teams that consistently identified consumers' parental status were more likely to talk with consumers about committed relationships and to assist consumers with parent-child communication. Parent-sensitive teams that frequently discussed parenting issues with consumers were less likely to be unsure of consumers' family plans, more likely to find out about parenting during goal setting, and more likely to assist with parent-related needs. Parent-sensitive teams that frequently provided assistance with parenting needs were more likely to serve minority consumers and consumers who want children, spend more time discussing parenting issues, and offer special programs for parent consumers. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Findings suggest that simply identifying consumers as parents is not sufficient for ensuring consistent provision of parent-supportive services, whereas discussing parenting issues is associated with increased service provision. More intensive, evidence-based parent-supportive services are needed, as well as continued research on parents with serious mental illnesses and available treatment services. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).
    Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 02/2014; 37(3). DOI:10.1037/prj0000050 · 0.75 Impact Factor