Article

Lhx2 selector activity specifies cortical identity and suppresses hippocampal organizer fate

Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005, India.
Science (Impact Factor: 31.48). 02/2008; 319(5861):304-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1151695
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The earliest step in creating the cerebral cortex is the specification of neuroepithelium to a cortical fate. Using mouse genetic mosaics and timed inactivations, we demonstrated that Lhx2 acts as a classic selector gene and essential intrinsic determinant of cortical identity. Lhx2 selector activity is restricted to an early critical period when stem cells comprise the cortical neuroepithelium, where it acts cell-autonomously to specify cortical identity and suppress alternative fates in a spatially dependent manner. Laterally, Lhx2 null cells adopt antihem identity, whereas medially they become cortical hem cells, which can induce and organize ectopic hippocampal fields. In addition to providing functional evidence for Lhx2 selector activity, these findings show that the cortical hem is a hippocampal organizer.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Satyaki Prasad Rajavasireddy, Feb 19, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
199 Views
  • Source
    • "Cortical areas and cortical folds form during embryonic development from the cortical anlage in highly stereotyped patterns, suggesting a strong genetic regulation (Borrell & Reillo, 2012). A limited number of transcription factors have been identified to control the size, position, and area identities of cortical subdivisions, including Pax6, Lhx2, Emx2, and Sp8 (Bishop et al, 2000; Yun et al, 2001; Sahara et al, 2007; Mangale et al, 2008; Chou et al, 2009). Despite the subdivision of the mature cerebral cortex into discrete structural/functional units, these transcription factors controlling regional fate are expressed in gradients across such subdivisions in the embryonic cortical germinal layers, raising the question of how the latter are implemented. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gyrencephalic species develop folds in the cerebral cortex in a stereotypic manner, but the genetic mechanisms underlying this patterning process are unknown. We present a large-scale transcriptomic analysis of individual germinal layers in the developing cortex of the gyrencephalic ferret, comparing between regions prospective of fold and fissure. We find unique transcriptional signatures in each germinal compartment, where thousands of genes are differentially expressed between regions, including ~80% of genes mutated in human cortical malformations. These regional differences emerge from the existence of discrete domains of gene expression, which occur at multiple locations across the developing cortex of ferret and human, but not the lissencephalic mouse. Complex expression patterns emerge late during development and map the eventual location of folds or fissures. Protomaps of gene expression within germinal layers may contribute to define cortical folds or functional areas, but our findings demonstrate that they distinguish the development of gyrencephalic cortices. © 2015 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY NC ND 4.0 license.
    The EMBO Journal 04/2015; 34(14). DOI:10.15252/embj.201591176 · 10.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Data are from mouse (E9.5–12.5) and chick (E4–E8) expression studies of mouse: Emx1/2, Pax6, Ngn2, Dlx2, Sommer et al. (1996), Puelles et al. (2000), Yun et al. (2001), Muzio et al. (2002), Backman et al. (2005); Wnt3a, Wnt8b, Bmp4, Foxg1, Parr et al. (1993), Hanashima et al. (2007); Lhx2, Monuki et al. (2001), Chou et al. (2009), Mangale et al. (2008); Dbx1, Medina et al. (2004), Bielle et al. (2005); Sfrp2, Kim et al. (2001), and chick: Emx1/2, Lhx2, Pax6, Dlx2, von Frowein et al. (2006), Puelles et al. (2000); Foxg1, Bell et al. (2001); Ngn2, Sfrp1, von Frowein et al. (2002); Wnt8b, Garda et al., 2002. In mouse, the expression of Emx1, Emx2 and Ngn2 extends into the Wnt3a + medial pallium domain. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The functional integrity of the neocortical circuit relies on the precise production of diverse neuron populations and their assembly during development. In recent years, extensive progress has been made in the understanding of the mechanisms that control differentiation of each neuronal type within the neocortex. In this review, we address how the elaborate neocortical cytoarchitecture is established from a simple neuroepithelium based on recent studies examining the spatiotemporal mechanisms of neuronal subtype specification. We further discuss the critical events that underlie the conversion of the stem amniotes cerebrum to a mammalian-type neocortex, and extend these key findings in the light of mammalian evolution to understand how the neocortex in humans evolved from common ancestral mammals.
    Neuroscience Research 07/2014; 86. DOI:10.1016/j.neures.2014.07.002 · 2.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "However, at later stages, LHX2 regulates the cell fate decisions of hippocampal progenitors. Downregulation of Lhx2 in the embryonic hippocampus was found to promote astrogliogenesis at the expense of neurogenesis, and overexpression of Lhx suppressed GFAP promoter activity, thereby favoring neuronal differentiation (Mangale et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Granule neurons in the hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG) receive their primary inputs from the cortex and are known to be continuously generated throughout adult life. Ongoing integration of newborn neurons into the existing hippocampal neural circuitry provides enhanced neuroplasticity, which plays a crucial role in learning and memory; deficits in this process have been associated with cognitive decline under neuropathological conditions. In this Primer, we summarize the developmental principles that regulate the process of DG neurogenesis and discuss recent advances in harnessing these developmental cues to generate DG granule neurons from human pluripotent stem cells.
    Development 06/2014; 141(12):2366-75. DOI:10.1242/dev.096776 · 6.27 Impact Factor
Show more