Industry influence in the creation of pay-for-performance quality measures.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
Quality management in health care 01/2008; 17(1):27-34. DOI: 10.1097/01.QMH.0000308635.59108.29
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT With the impact of pay for performance likely to broaden and deepen in the coming years, ensuring that the quality measures used in these initiatives are based on the best possible clinical evidence and expert consensus is paramount. Two types of organizations greatly influence the content of quality measures: measure development organizations-such as the National Committee for Quality Assurance-and medical professional societies. The process by which emerging measures of quality are created is subject to bias resulting from organizational and individual conflicts of interest in both types of organizations. This article examines the financial ties between those who-both directly and indirectly-help create the standards used in pay-for-performance programs and those firms whose revenues will increasingly depend on the substance of these measures. Several examples of inappropriate industry influence in the drafting of clinical practice guidelines by professional societies illustrate that these groups' future management of conflicts of interest may ultimately affect the success of pay-for-performance programs. Finally, policy options for minimizing the effects of these conflicts on the development of quality measures are discussed.

  • Source
    ECHE Roma - European Conference on Health Economics 2008, Rome-Italy; 07/2008
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Quality indicators are increasingly used as a tool to achieve safe and quality clinical care, cost-effective therapy, for professional learning, remuneration, accreditation and financial incentives. A substantial number focus on drug therapy but few address the introduction of new medicines even though this is a burning issue. The objective was to describe the issues and challenges in designing and implementing a transparent indicator framework and evaluation protocol for the introduction of new medicines and to provide guidance on how to apply quality indicators in the managed entry of new medicines. Quality indicators need to be developed early to assess whether new medicines are introduced appropriately. A number of key factors need to be addressed when developing, applying and evaluating indicators including dimensions of quality, suggested testing protocols, potential data sources, key implementation factors such as intended and unintended consequences, budget impact and cost-effectiveness, assuring the involvement of medical professions, patients and the public, and reliable and easy-to-use computerised tools for data collection and management. Transparent approaches include the need for any quality indicators developed to handle conflicts of interests to enhance their validity and acceptance. The suggested framework and indicator testing protocol may be useful in assessing the applicability of indicators for new medicines and may be adapted to healthcare settings worldwide. The suggestions build on existing literature to create a field testing methodology that can be used to produce country-specific quality indicators for new medicines as well as a pan-international approach to facilitate access to new medicines.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology 07/2014; 116(2). DOI:10.1111/bcpt.12295 · 2.29 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The operations of any portion of the healthcare delivery system, eg, ambulatory care, the consultation and referral process, or hospital care, are critically dependent upon their control systems. The quality of health care produced by the system and its components is also subject to "control." One of the regulatory mechanisms involves performance measures. The development of good measures of quality is a complex and dynamic process. Within endocrinology, most measures have addressed diabetes care and most quality measurement in diabetes has focused on the ambulatory setting and mainly includes measures of process and intermediate outcomes. This review addresses quality and performance measures for diabetes, their development, characteristics, use, misuse, and future prospects.
    Current Diabetes Reports 03/2014; 14(3):472. DOI:10.1007/s11892-013-0472-y · 3.38 Impact Factor