Article

[Alternative materials and solutions in total knee arthroplasty for patients with metal allergy].

Orthopädische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universität Rostock, Doberaner Strasse 142, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland.
Der Orthopäde (Impact Factor: 0.51). 03/2008; 37(2):136-42. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-007-1189-x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The annual number of total knee replacement implantations is rising continuously. A progressive cutaneous hypersensitivity rate against metallic materials in the population has been registered which can lead to an increase of allergy-induced reactions associated with implant loosening in the future although the correlation with an allergic cutaneous sensitisation has not been proven in all cases. On apparent allergy against metallic implant components different alternative solutions to standard endoprostheses should be taken into account for primary implantation or revision of total knee replacement, for example the application of implant components without metallic elements (e.g. ceramics), the use of non-allergic metallic implants, such as titanium or ZrNb alloys, or potential allergy-inducing metallic materials after masking the implant surface using a suitable coating. In the case of primary or revision surgery most patients with metal allergy are treated with a Ti(Nb)N-coated knee implant made of cobalt-chrome or titanium alloys in our hospital. Within an international multi-centre study we are currently implanting a newly developed knee endoprosthesis system with a ceramic femoral component as an alternative.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
113 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE. To compare the short-term outcome of the Multigen Plus system using a symmetric ceramic femoral component with that of 2 metallic total knee replacement (TKR) systems. METHODS. 60 patients (62 knees) with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis underwent primary TKR using the Genia system (n=20), the Multigen Plus system (n=17), and the Multigen Plus system with a ceramic femoral component (n=25). Outcome was evaluated pre- and post-operatively (at 3, 12, and 24 months) using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) score, and the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) score. RESULTS. The 3 groups did not differ significantly at all 4 time points in terms of the HSS score, WOMAC score, and SF-36 score. The range of motion was significantly less in patients treated with the Genia system. Postoperatively, the HSS and WOMAC scores improved significantly in all 3 groups, whereas the SF-36 score improved significantly (at 12 and 24 months) only in patients treated with the Multigen Plus system with a ceramic femoral component. The implant position in most patients was optimal. All radiolucent lines were within 1 mm and did not progress. CONCLUSION. The short-term outcome of the 3 TKR systems was comparable. Ceramic femoral components performed comparably to traditional metallic designs.
    Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) 12/2013; 21(3):294-9.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ceramic components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are evolving. We analyze the first case of BIOLOX delta ceramic femoral component fracture. A longitudinal midline fracture in the patellar groove was present, with an intact cement mantle and no bony defects. Fractographic analysis with laser scanning microscopy and white light interferometry showed no evidence of arrest lines, hackles, wake hackles, material flaws, fatigue or crack propagation. Analysis of periprosthetic tissues with Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) microscopy, contact radiography, histology, and subsequent digestion and high-speed centrifugation did not show ceramic debris. A macrophage-dominated response was present around polyethylene debris. We conclude that ceramic femoral component failure in this case was related to a traumatic event. Further research is needed to determine the suitability of ceramic components in TKA.
    The Journal of arthroplasty 11/2013; · 1.79 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Wear debris, of deferent sizes, shapes and quantities, generated in artificial hip and knees is largely confined to the bone and joint interface. This debris interacts with periprosthetic tissue and may cause aseptic loosening. The purpose of this review is to summarize and collate findings of the recent demonstrations on debris characterization and their biological response that influences the occurrence in implant migration. A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature is performed, based on inclusion and exclusion criteria addressing mainly debris isolation, characterization, and biologic responses. Results show that debris characterization largely depends on their appropriate and accurate isolation protocol. The particles are found to be non-uniform in size and non-homogeneously distributed into the periprosthetic tissues. In addition, the sizes, shapes, and volumes of the particles are influenced by the types of joints, bearing geometry, material combination, and lubricant. Phagocytosis of wear debris is size dependent; high doses of submicron-sized particles induce significant level of secretion of bone resorbing factors. However, articles on wear debris from engineered surfaces (patterned and coated) are lacking. The findings suggest considering debris morphology as an important parameter to evaluate joint simulator and newly developed implant materials.
    Materials 02/2014; 7(2):980-1016. · 2.25 Impact Factor