Adherence to the medical regimen during the first two years after lung transplantation.

1 Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Transplantation (Impact Factor: 3.78). 02/2008; 85(2):193-202. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318160135f
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Despite the importance of adherence to the medical regimen for maximizing health after lung transplantation, no prospective studies report on rates or risk factors for nonadherence in this patient population. Whether adherence levels differ in lung versus other types of transplant recipients is unknown.
A total of 178 lung recipients and a comparison group of 126 heart recipients were enrolled. Adherence in nine areas was assessed in separate patient and family caregiver interviews 2, 7, 12, 18, and 24 months posttransplant. Potential risk factors for nonadherence were obtained at the initial assessment.
Cumulative incidence rates of persistent nonadherence (i.e., nonadherence at > or =2 consecutive assessments) were significantly lower (P<0.05) in lung recipients than heart recipients for taking immunosuppressants (13% nonadherent vs. 21%, respectively), diet (34% vs. 56%), and smoking (1% vs. 8%). Lung recipients had significantly higher persistent nonadherence to completing blood work (28% vs. 17%) and monitoring blood pressure (70% vs. 59%). They had a high rate of spirometry nonadherence (62%; not measured in heart recipients). The groups did not differ in nonadherence to attending clinic appointments (27%), exercise (44%), or alcohol limitations (7%). In both groups, poor caregiver support and having only public insurance (e.g., Medicaid) increased nonadherence risk in all areas.
Lung recipients were neither uniformly better nor worse than heart recipients in adhering to their regimen. Lung recipients have particular difficulty with some home monitoring activities. Strategies to maximize adherence in both groups should build on caregiver support and on strengthening financial resources for patient healthcare requirements.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nonadherence to immunosuppressive (IS) therapy is associated with poor outcomes. Identifying factors predicting poor adherence is therefore essential. The primary objective of this study was to test whether parameters of a model adapted from the theory of planned behavior, and more specifically attitudes that are influenced by beliefs and satisfaction with medication, could predict adherence in solid organ transplant patients.
    Transplantation 06/2014; · 3.78 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Heart or lung transplantation is a complex intervention requiring medication adherence. The objective of this systematic review is to estimate the prevalence of non-adherence (NA) with post-transplantation medication in heart or lung recipients and to assess its clinical impact. We examined in the selected studies if the authors considered the patient's perspective in their evaluations. The electronic database MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Central Register were searched. Only studies that reported the number of non-adhere subjects were eligible. The different methods of measurement, the ways in which authors defined NA and if authors had integrated patient's perspective in their secondary objectives were also assessed. The range frequency of NA was 1-42.9% for all drugs. Non-adherent patients tend to experience worse outcomes compared to adherent patients. The patient's perception of drug side-effects is the most reported patient-related factor for impairing adherence. NA after heart or lung transplantation is an important issue and concerns not only immunosuppressant treatments. The main striking point of the selected studies is the lack of patient perspective and the omission of patients-healthcare providers' relationship. Future research must focus on patients' motivation for the medication-taking behaviour.
    Patient Education and Counseling 11/2010; 81(2):148-54. · 2.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Context-Effective lung transplant education helps ensure informed decision making by patients and better transplant outcomes.Objective-To understand the educational needs and experiences of lung transplant patients.Design-Mixed-method study employing focus groups and patient surveys.Setting-Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St Louis, Missouri.Patients-50 adult lung transplant patients: 23 pretransplant and 27 posttransplant.Main Outcome Measures-Patients' interest in receiving specific transplant information, the stage in the transplant process during which they wanted to receive the education, and the preferred format for presenting the information.Results-Patients most wanted information about how to sustain their transplant (72%), when to contact their coordinator immediately (56%), transplant benefits (56%), immunosuppressants (54%), and possible out-of-pocket expenses (52%). Patients also wanted comprehensive information early in the transplant process and a review of a subset of topics immediately before transplant (time between getting the call that a potential donor has been found and getting the transplant). Patients reported that they would use Internet resources (74%) and converse with transplant professionals (68%) and recipients (62%) most often.Discussion-Lung transplant patients are focused on learning how to get a transplant and ensuring its success afterwards. A comprehensive overview of the evaluation, surgery, and recovery process at evaluation onset with a review of content about medications, pain management, and transplant recovery repeated immediately before surgery is ideal.
    Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.) 06/2014; 24(2):132-41. · 0.81 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 20, 2014