Caffeine, alcohol, smoking, and the risk of incident epithelial ovarian cancer

Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Cancer (Impact Factor: 4.89). 03/2008; 112(5):1169-77. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23275
Source: PubMed


Smoking, caffeine, and alcohol intake are all potentially modifiable factors that have an unclear association with ovarian cancer risk. Therefore, the associations between these exposures and ovarian cancer risk were prospectively examined among 110,454 women in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) for the smoking analyses and 80,253 women for the dietary analyses.
Women completed biennial questionnaires assessing ovarian cancer risk factors beginning in 1976, with food frequency questionnaires administered every 2 to 4 years starting in 1980. For the smoking analyses, 737 confirmed cases of epithelial ovarian cancer were identified and for the dietary aims, 507 cases were identified through June 1, 2004.
Compared with never-smokers, neither current nor past smoking was associated with ovarian cancer risk overall; however, both were associated with mucinous tumors (n = 69; rate ratio [RR], past = 2.02 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-3.55]; RR, current = 2.22 [95% CI, 1.16-4.24]). A modest inverse association between caffeine intake and ovarian cancer risk was observed (RR, top vs bottom quintile = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.60-1.07 [P = .03]), which was strongest for women who had never used either oral contraceptives (RR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.92 [P for heterogeneity = .02]) or postmenopausal hormones (RR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.91 [P for heterogeneity = .13]). Alcohol was not associated with ovarian cancer risk.
The results of the current study suggest that cigarette smoking may only increase the risk for mucinous ovarian tumors, and alcohol intake was not associated with risk. However, an inverse association was observed between caffeine intake and ovarian cancer risk, particularly in women not using hormones; this finding merits further study.

6 Reads
  • Source
    • "Three epidemiologic studies were excluded because there was no direct assessment of tea intake [41], there was no assessment of the relationship between tea intake and EOC [42] or no confidence intervals were provided [43]. Other epidemiologic studies were excluded because green tea intake was not specifically measured [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59]. One study was reported twice [18] [19], and one study was first reported in an abstract form [16] and then as a peer-reviewed article [17]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This systematic review was conducted to examine the effects of green tea or green tea components on the prevention and progression of epithelial ovarian cancer. Using Medline, EMBASE and SciVerse (last researched: July 2011), we retrieved 22 articles including 5 epidemiological studies. In epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines, green tea and green tea components have been shown to downregulate the expression of proteins involved in inflammation, cell signalization, cell motility and angiogenesis. Green tea and green tea components would induce apoptosis and could potentiate the effects of cisplatin, a chemotherapeutic agent. In human observational studies, significant associations between green tea intake and both decreased ovarian cancer occurrence and better prognosis were reported. Available literature suggests potential molecular targets for green tea in ovarian cancer treatment and also provides data supporting the clinical evaluation of the role of green tea or green tea components in ovarian cancer prevention and treatment.
    Gynecologic Oncology 05/2012; 126(3):491-8. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.04.048 · 3.77 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Ganmaa et al. (2008) observed no substantial association between caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee with the onset or progression of breast cancer. However, their results suggested a weak inverse association between caffeine-containing beverages and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer (Tworoger et al., 2008). The debate between the association of breast cancer and coffee consumption still needs to be settled. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Coffee is the leading worldwide beverage after water and its trade exceeds US $10 billion worldwide. Controversies regarding its benefits and risks still exist as reliable evidence is becoming available supporting its health promoting potential; however, some researchers have argued about the association of coffee consumption with cardiovascular complications and cancer insurgence. The health-promoting properties of coffee are often attributed to its rich phytochemistry, including caffeine, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, hydroxyhydroquinone (HHQ), etc. Many research investigations, epidemiological studies, and meta-analyses regarding coffee consumption revealed its inverse correlation with that of diabetes mellitus, various cancer lines, Parkinsonism, and Alzheimer's disease. Moreover, it ameliorates oxidative stress because of its ability to induce mRNA and protein expression, and mediates Nrf2-ARE pathway stimulation. Furthermore, caffeine and its metabolites help in proper cognitive functionality. Coffee lipid fraction containing cafestol and kahweol act as a safeguard against some malignant cells by modulating the detoxifying enzymes. On the other hand, their higher levels raise serum cholesterol, posing a possible threat to coronary health, for example, myocardial and cerebral infarction, insomnia, and cardiovascular complications. Caffeine also affects adenosine receptors and its withdrawal is accompanied with muscle fatigue and allied problems in those addicted to coffee. An array of evidence showed that pregnant women or those with postmenopausal problems should avoid excessive consumption of coffee because of its interference with oral contraceptives or postmenopausal hormones. This review article is an attempt to disseminate general information, health claims, and obviously the risk factors associated with coffee consumption to scientists, allied stakeholders, and certainly readers.
    Critical reviews in food science and nutrition 04/2011; 51(4):363-73. DOI:10.1080/10408390903586412 · 5.18 Impact Factor
    • "and RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36–0.91, respectively) [74]. The subcohort of all postmenopausal women also showed a 12% decrease in the risk of developing breast cancer (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79–0.97) "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The beneficial effects of human caffeine consumption deserve clarification. A detailed literature review was conducted and summarized. A large body of scientific evidence describes the beneficial effects of human caffeine consumption on a number of physiologic systems. The consumption of moderate amounts of caffeine 1) increases energy availability, 2) increases daily energy expenditure, 3) decreases fatigue, 4) decreases the sense of effort associated with physical activity, 5) enhances physical performance, 6) enhances motor performance, 7) enhances cognitive performance, 8) increases alertness, wakefulness, and feelings of "energy," 9) decreases mental fatigue, 10) quickens reactions, 11) increases the accuracy of reactions, 12) increases the ability to concentrate and focus attention, 13) enhances short-term memory, 14) increases the ability to solve problems requiring reasoning, 15) increases the ability to make correct decisions, 16) enhances cognitive functioning capabilities and neuromuscular coordination, and 17) in otherwise healthy non-pregnant adults is safe.
    Nutrition 10/2010; 26(10):932-8. DOI:10.1016/j.nut.2010.08.004 · 2.93 Impact Factor
Show more


6 Reads