Off-label drug use among hospitalised children: identifying areas with the highest need for research

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy, Heinrich-Heine University of Düsseldorf, Universitätsstrasse 1, Dusseldorf 40225, Germany.
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (Impact Factor: 1.27). 02/2008; 30(5):497-502. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-008-9193-8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To analyse the off-label use of drugs on a paediatric ward in Germany, and to identify domains of pharmacotherapy with the highest need for research concerning off-label use in children.
A prospective observational study was conducted on a paediatric ward in Duesseldorf in Germany between January and June 2006.
Data about patients, diagnoses and prescribed drugs were collected from the prescription records and the discharge letters. Diagnoses were classified in groups by means of the International Classification of Diseases. Drugs were grouped according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification system. We compared the off-label prescriptions with those on the list of paediatric needs and priority list established by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA).
Off-label use was defined due to age, indication, route of application and dose.
The study included 417 patients. We analysed 1,812 prescriptions representing 211 different drugs. In total, 253 patients (61%) received at least one off-label prescription. Of all analysed prescriptions, 553 (31%) were off-label. The percentage of off-label prescriptions among the five most frequently prescribed drug groups were as follows: 60% cardiovascular drugs (CV: 129/216), 42% anti-infectives (AI: 190/449), 30% drugs for respiratory system (RS: 100/335), 25% drugs for alimentary tract and metabolism (AM: 67/269) and 3% analgesics and antipyretics (AA: 8/264); with 17 drugs, the cardiovascular drugs also showed the highest number of different off-label prescribed drugs due to age: AI: 14; AM: 11; RS: 5; AA: 1. In addition, there was a nearly complete overlap between the identified off-label prescriptions in cardiovascular drugs and those listed by the EMEA to be prioritized for urgent research in Europe.
Cardiovascular drugs are a domain of pharmacotherapy, with a large need for research in paediatrics. The results of our study can guide the researcher to future trials on off-label prescriptions such as cardiovascular drugs, especially due to the fact that the identified off-label prescribed drugs in this group are also mentioned by the EMEA to be prioritized for paediatric research.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: In children, the incidence of off-label prescriptions in primary care varies between 10·5% and 22·7%, whilst the incidence of unlicensed prescriptions in primary care varies between 0·3% and 16·6%. This information has not been investigated in Malta. Objective: To identify therapeutic areas which warrant research in children in the community setting in Malta according to the proportion and nature of off-label and unlicensed medicinal use. Methods: Interim analysis involving the assessment of prescriptions for children in a prospective pharmaco-epidemiological study. Data regarding prescriptions in 37 private clinics and pharmacies attended by paediatricians and family doctors were collected for a cohort of 209 patients aged 0-14 years. The medicines were categorised as licensed, unlicensed or off-label. They were also classified into various categories such as patient age-group, data collection period, prescriber type and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. Results: 113 of 209 (54·1%) medicinal products were used in an off-label and unlicensed manner, the highest number being in the 2-11-years age range (76/209). The majority of drugs were for the respiratory system. The proportion off-label drug prescribing because of age decreased progressively with increasing age whilst the proportion off-label prescribing because of dose increased with age. Conclusion: The main cause of off-label prescribing appears to be a failure to adhere to licensed dose recommendations and a lack of agreement between the existing literature and drug licences.
    02/2014; 34(1):12-8. DOI:10.1179/204690513X13656734979929
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The application of drugs in accordance with the marketing authorization issued by the regulatory authority is considered on-label use, while off-label drug use frequently occurs in medical practice. It includes the application of drugs beyond approved indications; for unapproved age group, with different dosage regimens or different administration route. Medical specialists frequently prescribe an off-label drug in pediatrics, neonatology, geriatrics, psychiatry and oncology. Some countries have established registers of off-label drugs and guidelines for their prescribing and administration. The aim of the paper is to review practices in off-label drug use in order to satisfy the attitude of regulatory bodies and professional associations regarding the off-label use of drugs. The sources of information used are articles published in scientific journals and information from the official websites of regulatory agencies. The most common reasons why physicians decide to prescribe off-label drugs are primarily the absence of drugs for a particular indication or those for a particular age group. In their daily work, doctors prescribe drugs for an off-label use based on their own or other colleague's experience. There is no general agreement on off-label use of drugs at the national or international level, but more and more doctors' associations and regulatory bodies approve off-label drug use in compliance with certain scientific and legal requirements. Off-label drug use has its place in practice and it has been widely accepted by the medical community and by itself it is not a violation of the standards of healthcare. Off-label use is common in our country and worldwide, and it is necessary to establish a registry for off-label drug use.
    Medicinski pregled 01/2015; 68(1-2):35-40. DOI:10.2298/MPNS1502035G
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To estimate the prevalence of off-label and unlicensed prescribing during 2008 at a major paediatric teaching hospital in Western Australia. A 12-month retrospective study was conducted at Princess Margaret Hospital using medication chart records randomly selected from 145,550 patient encounters from the Emergency Department, Inpatient Wards and Outpatient Clinics. Patient and prescribing data were collected. Drugs were classified as off-label or unlicensed based on Australian registration data. A hierarchical system of age, indication, route of administration and dosage was used. Drugs were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Code. A total of 1,037 paediatric patients were selected where 2,654 prescriptions for 330 different drugs were prescribed to 699 patients (67.4%). Most off-label drugs (n = 295; 43.3%) were from the nervous system; a majority of unlicensed drugs were systemic hormonal preparations excluding sex hormones (n = 22, 32.4%). Inpatients were prescribed more off-label drugs than outpatients or Emergency Department patients (p < 0.0001). Most off-label prescribing occurred in infants and children (31.7% and 35.9% respectively) and the highest percentage of unlicensed prescribing (7.2%) occurred in infants (p < 0.0001). There were 25.7% of off-label and 2.6% of unlicensed medications prescribed across all three settings. Common reasons for off-label prescribing were dosage (47.4%) and age (43.2%). This study confirmed off-label and unlicensed use of drugs remains common. Further, that prevalence of both is influenced by the clinical setting, which has implications in regards to medication misadventure, and the need to have systems in place to minimise medication errors. Further, there remains a need for changes in the regulatory system in Australia to ensure that manufacturers incorporate, as it becomes available, evidence regarding efficacy and safety of their drugs in children in the official product information.
    PLoS ONE 03/2015; 10(3):e0120630. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0120630 · 3.53 Impact Factor


Available from