Article

Rapid in vivo musculoskeletal MR with parallel imaging at 7T.

Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.27). 04/2008; 59(3):655-60. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21455
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this work was to implement autocalibrating GRAPPA-based parallel imaging (PI) for in vivo high-resolution (HR) MRI of cartilage and trabecular bone micro-architecture at 7T and to evaluate its performance based on comparison of MR-derived morphology metrics between accelerated and conventional images and comparison of geometry factor measures between 3T and 7T. Using an eight channel coil array for trabecular MRI at the ankle, a higher maximum feasible acceleration (R) = 6 and lower geometry factor values than that at 3T were observed. The advantages of two-dimensional acceleration were also demonstrated. In knee cartilage and bone acquisitions, feasibility of PI with a dual-channel quadrature coil was investigated. Robust quantification of bone and cartilage metrics could be derived from accelerated ankle and knee acquisitions. PI can enhance the clinical feasibility of in vivo bone and cartilage HR-MRI for osteoporosis and osteoarthritis at 7T.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
58 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECT: Our objective was to use 7 T MRI to compare cartilage morphology (thickness) and collagen composition (T2 values) in cartilage repair patients and healthy controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We scanned the knees of 11 cartilage repair patients and 11 controls on a 7 T MRI scanner using a high-resolution, gradient-echo sequence to measure cartilage thickness and a multi-echo spin-echo sequence to measure cartilage T2 values. We used two-tailed t tests to compare cartilage thickness and T2 values in: repair tissue (RT) versus adjacent cartilage (AC); RT versus healthy control cartilage (HC); AC versus HC. RESULTS: Mean thickness in RT, AC, HC were: 2.2 ± 1.4, 3.6 ± 1.1, 3.3 ± 0.7 mm. Differences in thickness between RT-AC (p = 0.01) and RT-HC (p = 0.02) were significant, but not AC-HC (p = 0.45). Mean T2 values in RT, AC, HC were: 51.6 ± 7.6, 40.0 ± 4.7, 45.9 ± 3.7 ms. Differences in T2 values between RT-AC (p = 0.0005), RT-HC (p = 0.04), and AC-HC (p = 0.004) were significant. CONCLUSION: 7 T MRI allows detection of differences in morphology and collagen architecture in: (1) cartilage repair tissue compared to adjacent cartilage and (2) cartilage repair tissue compared to cartilage from healthy controls. Although cartilage adjacent to repair tissue may be normal in thickness, it can demonstrate altered collagen composition.
    MAGMA Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology and Medicine 05/2013; · 1.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To demonstrate the feasibility of performing bone microarchitecture, high-resolution cartilage, and clinical imaging of the hip at 7T. This study had Institutional Review Board approval. Using an 8-channel coil constructed in-house, we imaged the hips of 15 subjects on a 7T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. We applied: 1) a T1-weighted 3D fast low angle shot (3D FLASH) sequence (0.23 × 0.23 × 1-1.5 mm(3) ) for bone microarchitecture imaging; 2) T1-weighted 3D FLASH (water excitation) and volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequences (0.23 × 0.23 × 1.5 mm(3) ) with saturation or inversion recovery-based fat suppression for cartilage imaging; 3) 2D intermediate-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) sequences without and with fat saturation (0.27 × 0.27 × 2 mm) for clinical imaging. Bone microarchitecture images allowed visualization of individual trabeculae within the proximal femur. Cartilage was well visualized and fat was well suppressed on FLASH and VIBE sequences. FSE sequences allowed visualization of cartilage, the labrum (including cartilage and labral pathology), joint capsule, and tendons. This is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility of performing a clinically comprehensive hip MRI protocol at 7T, including high-resolution imaging of bone microarchitecture and cartilage, as well as clinical imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013;. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 09/2013; · 2.57 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Foot and ankle procedures are commonly performed most often in the setting of trauma or for realignment such as hallux valgus or acquired adult flatfoot deformity correction. Complications of these procedures occur not infrequently and therefore diagnostic imaging of the postoperative foot and ankle is often needed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is ideal for imaging the postoperative foot and ankle, as it can evaluate both osseous and soft-tissue pathology. Using tailored MR pulse sequences to reduce metal artifact helps to increase diagnostic yield and evaluation of the regional anatomic structures. This review discusses suggested MRI protocols for evaluating the postoperative foot and ankle as well as the MRI appearance of commonly performed procedures in the foot and ankle such as internal fixation for fractures, forefoot and flatfoot realignment surgeries, and cartilage restorative procedures, as well as some of the more commonly encountered postoperative complications. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013;37:556-565. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 03/2013; 37(3):556-65. · 2.57 Impact Factor