The patient health questionnaire, Japanese version: validity according to the mini-international neuropsychiatric interview-plus.

The Clinical Psychology Course, Graduate School of Niigata Seiryo University 1-5939, Suido Cho, Cyuoku, Niigata City, Niigata 951-8121, Japan.
Psychological Reports (Impact Factor: 0.44). 01/2008; 101(3 Pt 1):952-60. DOI:10.2466/PR0.101.7.952-960
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To validate the Japanese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire against the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus in Japan 131 patients in 4 primary care settings and 2 general hospital settings participated. These patients completed the Patient Health Questionnaire and returned it to their physician within 48 hr. Subsequently, the subjects underwent a diagnostic evaluation interview based on the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus by an interviewer blind to the results of the Patient Health Questionnaire screening. The Patient Health Questionnaire diagnosis was characterized using kappa values between 0.70 and 1.0 for Somatoform Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Panic Disorder, Bulimia Nervosa, Alcohol Abuse/Dependence, and Premenstrual Disorder. Sensitivities, specificities, and negative predictive values were very good (between 0.84 and 1.0) for the first 4 diagnoses but not Alcohol Abuse/Dependence or Premenstrual Disorder, as were the Positive predictive values (between 0.78 and 1.0). Findings show very good concordance of the Japanese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire with the Japanese version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus.

0 0
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two depression screening tools, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 and PHQ-2, have not had their validity examined in general internal medicine settings in Japan. We examined the validity of these screening tools. A total of 598 outpatients of an internal medicine clinic in a rural general hospital were enrolled consecutively and stratified by PHQ-9 score. Seventy-five patients randomly selected and 29 patients whose results from the PHQ-9 were considered to be positive for depressive disorder were then interviewed with a semistructured interview, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. We calculated diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 to detect major depression and that of the suicidality item of the PHQ-9 to detect suicidality using sampling weights with multiple imputations. Sensitivity and specificity for depression were 0.86 and 0.85, respectively, for the PHQ-9 with cutoff points of 4/5, and 0.77 and 0.95, respectively, for the PHQ-2 with cutoff points of 2/3. Sensitivity and specificity of the suicidality item of the PHQ-9 were 0.70 and 0.97, respectively. In internal medicine clinics in Japanese rural hospitals, the PHQ-2 with an optimal cutoff point for each setting plus the suicidality item of the PHQ-9 can be recommended to detect depression without missing suicidality.
    General hospital psychiatry 09/2013; · 2.67 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), despite its excellent reliability and validity in primary care, has not been examined for administration to psychiatric patients. This study assesses the accuracy of PHQ-9 in screening for major depressive episode and in diagnosing major depressive episode in patients of a psychiatric specialty clinic. We compared operational characteristics of PHQ-9 as a screening and diagnostic instrument to DSM-IV-TR diagnosis by a trained psychiatrist as a reference standard. The reference criteria were "current major depressive episode" or "current major depressive episode with major depressive disorder". PHQ-9 was used with two thresholds: diagnostic algorithm and summary scores (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). The optimal cut-off points of PHQ-9 summary scores were analyzed using a receiver operational characteristics (ROC) curve. For "current major depressive episode", PHQ-9 showed high sensitivity and high negative predictive value at both thresholds, but its specificity and positive predictive value were low. For "current major depressive episode with major depressive disorder", PHQ-9 also showed high sensitivity and high negative predictive value at both thresholds, but the positive predictive value decreased more than that for "current major depressive episode". The ROC analysis showed the optimal cut-off score of 13/14 for "current major depressive episode". PHQ-9 is useful for screening, but not for diagnosis of "current major depressive episode" in a psychiatric specialty clinic.
    BMC Psychiatry 07/2012; 12:73. · 2.23 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although attention has recently been focused on the role of psychosocial factors in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), the factors that have the greatest influence on prognosis have not yet been elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of depression, anxiety, and anger on the prognosis of patients with CVD. Four hundred fourteen consecutive patients hospitalized with CVD were prospectively enrolled. Depression was evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire, anxiety using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire, and anger using the Spielberger Trait Anger Scale. Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to examine the individual effects of depression, anxiety, and anger on a combined primary end point of cardiac death or cardiac hospitalization and on a combined secondary end point of all-cause death or hospitalization during follow-up (median 14.2 months). Multivariate analysis showed that depression was a significant risk factor for cardiovascular hospitalization or death after adjusting for cardiac risk factors and other psychosocial factors (hazard ratio 2.62, p = 0.02), whereas anxiety was not significantly associated with cardiovascular hospitalization or death after adjustment (hazard ratio 2.35, p = 0.10). Anger was associated with a low rate of cardiovascular hospitalization or death (hazard ratio 0.34, p <0.01). In conclusion, depression in hospitalized patients with CVD is a stronger independent risk factor for adverse cardiac events than either anxiety or anger. Anger may help prevent adverse outcomes. Routine screening for depression should therefore be performed in patients with CVD, and the potential effects of anger in clinical practice should be reconsidered.
    The American journal of cardiology 02/2013; · 3.58 Impact Factor