Article

Prevalence, Severity, and Impact of Symptoms on Female Family Caregivers of Patients at the Initiation of Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

University of California, 2 Koret Way, Box 0610, San Francisco, CA 94143-0610, USA.
Journal of Clinical Oncology (Impact Factor: 17.88). 03/2008; 26(4):599-605. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.2838
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In a sample of family caregivers (FCs) of patients with prostate cancer who were to begin radiation therapy (RT), the purposes were to determine the prevalence and severity of depression, anxiety, pain, sleep disturbance, and fatigue; determine the relationships among these symptoms and between these symptoms and functional status and quality of life (QOL); evaluate for differences in functional status and QOL between FCs with low and high levels of these symptoms; and determine which factors predicted FCs' functional status and QOL.
FCs were recruited before patients initiated RT and completed self-report questionnaires that evaluated demographic characteristics, symptoms, functional status, and QOL.
Sixty female FCs participated in the study. On the basis of established cut point scores for each symptom questionnaire, 12.2% of the FCs had clinically meaningful levels of depression, 40.7% anxiety, 15.0% pain, 36.7% sleep disturbance, 33.3% morning fatigue, and 30.0% evening fatigue. FCs who were older and who had lower levels of state anxiety and higher levels of depression, morning fatigue, and pain reported significantly poorer functional status (R(2) = 38.7%). FCs who were younger, had more years of education, were working, and who had higher levels of depression, morning fatigue, sleep disturbance, and lower levels of evening fatigue reported significantly lower QOL scores (R(2) = 70.1%).
A high percentage of FCs experienced clinically meaningful levels of a variety of symptoms. These symptoms have a negative impact on the FCs' functional status and QOL.

0 Followers
 · 
78 Views
  • Source
    • "Subscales scores of ≥3 and a total score of ≥43 indicate a significant level of sleep disturbance (Fletcher et al., 2008b). The GSDS has well-established validity and reliability in shift workers, pregnant women, patients with cancer , or HIV, and in FCs (Carney et al., 2011; Fletcher et al., 2008b). In the present study, its Chronbach's alpha was .91. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study investigated levels of symptoms, caregiver burden, and changes over time in 278 family caregivers (FC) of cancer patients. FCs experienced high levels of depressive symptoms and sleep disturbance, low levels of fatigue, and low to moderate levels of caregiver burden, yet these symptoms remained relatively stable over time. Being female and not being employed were factors associated with an increased risk of symptoms and caregiver burden. The understanding evolving from this study can enhance social- and health care professionals' awareness of FCs' challenging situation and the potential impact this has on the FCs' ability to provide care to the patient.
    Social Work in Health Care 03/2014; 53(3):289-309. DOI:10.1080/00981389.2013.873518 · 0.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The total GSDS score can range from 0 (no disturbance) to 147 (extreme sleep disturbance). A total GSDS score of !43 indicates a clinically meaningful level of sleep disturbance (Fletcher et al., 2008; Lee, 1992). Cronbach's alpha for the GSDS total score was 0.86. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To attempt to replicate the associations found in our previous study of patients and family caregivers between interleukin 6 (IL6) and nuclear factor kappa beta 2 (NFKB2) and sleep disturbance and to identify additional genetic associations in a larger sample of patients with breast cancer. Patients with breast cancer (n = 398) were recruited prior to surgery and followed for six months. Patients completed a self-report measure of sleep disturbance and provided a blood sample for genomic analyses. Growth mixture modeling was used to identify distinct latent classes of patients with higher and lower levels of sleep disturbance. Patients who were younger and who had higher comorbidity and lower functional status were more likely to be in the high sustained sleep disturbance class. Variations in three cytokine genes (i.e., IL1 receptor 2 (IL1R2), IL13, NFKB2) predicted latent class membership. Polymorphisms in cytokine genes may partially explain inter-individual variability in sleep disturbance. Determination of high risk phenotypes and associated molecular markers may allow for earlier identification of patients at higher risk for developing sleep disturbance and lead to the development of more targeted clinical interventions.
    European journal of oncology nursing: the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society 09/2013; 18(1). DOI:10.1016/j.ejon.2013.08.004 · 1.79 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Lazarus and Folkman's theory of stress, appraisal, and coping was used as the framework for this study. In relation to Lazarus and Folkman's (1984) theory, sleep quality and caregiver burden have been shown to influence stress in maternal caregivers, and may act as antecedents to the maternal caregiver's appraisal of the situation (Fletcher et al., 2008; Gallagher et al., 2010). Sleep quality may influence how the maternal caregiver perceives her interaction with her environment and how she perceives her child's needs or care. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Little is known about the influence of sleep quality, stress, and caregiver burden on quality of life in maternal caregivers of young children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). In 61 maternal caregivers (mean age 29.59years) of young children with BPD (mean age 13.93months), caregivers reported sleeping a mean of 5.8hours, and significant correlations were found between sleep quality and depressive symptoms and stress, as well as an inverse correlation with quality of life. Sleep quality was found to be the most significant predictor of quality of life in maternal caregivers.
    Journal of pediatric nursing 08/2013; 29(1). DOI:10.1016/j.pedn.2013.08.001 · 0.92 Impact Factor